• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

covert_shores

Research + illustration
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2014
Messages
703
Reaction score
164
Website
www.hisutton.com
http://www.hisutton.com/SNLE-3G.html
https://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/defence-news/2018/october-2018-navy-naval-defense-news/6538-here-is-the-first-image-of-the-french-navy-next-generation-ssbn-snle-3g.html

Expected into service in ~2032. 16 SLBMs, 14,500 tons surfaced.
 

Attachments

  • Fr_SNLE-3G_model.jpg
    Fr_SNLE-3G_model.jpg
    60.2 KB · Views: 467
  • Fr_SNLE-3G_timeline.jpg
    Fr_SNLE-3G_timeline.jpg
    308.5 KB · Views: 473
  • Fr_SNLE-3G.jpg
    Fr_SNLE-3G.jpg
    38.8 KB · Views: 469
  • Fr_SNLE-3G_2.jpg
    Fr_SNLE-3G_2.jpg
    49.6 KB · Views: 449

Trident

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 8, 2006
Messages
1,090
Reaction score
400
Good article!

Not sure I'd describe the stern control surfaces as particularly large though, it's merely the aspect ratio (span vs. area) which is markedly different to other designs IMHO. One possible advantage of this configuration is apparent from the beam view drawing: the surfaces probably do not protrude beyond the maximum cross section of the hull - maybe it is intended to be capable of sitting on the sea bed?

Oh, and Columbia class, right ;)
 

Trident

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 8, 2006
Messages
1,090
Reaction score
400
Yes, I've noticed that tendency as well! In this particular instance the low aspect ratio may offer a readily apparent explanation, but that doesn't apply to Barracuda et al.
 

bobbymike

ACCESS: USAP
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
10,724
Reaction score
1,799
Top