On special request ...
Shown as an artist impression from the year 1938 in “The Thunder Factory” by Joshua Stoff, this design
seems to have some similarities to the later Lockheed L-134-3, with two fuselage mounted engines, driving
four props via shafts, but contrary to the Lockheed design there was a push/pull combination in each
wing, not contra rotating pusher props. With regards to the artist impression, this design would have
been formidably armed indeed with at least 5 guns in the nose, 8 guns in each wing firing outside of
the propeller arc and additionally there seem to have been another gun in each propeller shaft,
summing up to 23 (!) guns firing forward ! And for rear defence there seems to be at least one remotely
controlled gun in the tail, too. I haven’t heard of another design so well armed !
In fact, I cannot help the feeling, that the artist had put a little bit too much “art” in his drawing.
Besides the openings in the middle fuselage, I cannot see anything, that would guarantee sufficient
cooling for the two engines, which would have to be of a very powerful type indeed, just in order to
lift this conglomeration of guns. Landing gear probably would have been of tricycle type, as a classical
tailwheel landing gear would have needed quite long main gear legs, to give sufficient ground clearance
for the aft props. A nother detail, that puzzled me, was the cockpit, which seems to be offset to the
left hand side of the fuselage. But as the dorsal fuselage itself gave no other indication of this, I put it
on the centerline. So, to my opinion, if Seversky really was planning to built a multi-engined high-
altitude fighter, it quite probably would have looked very different.
But, to be fair, maybe the artist back in 1938 was just tasked with making a drawing of “a twin engined
fighter with fuselage mounted engines, but, please, make it well armed !”
