- Joined
- 27 December 2005
- Messages
- 17,748
- Reaction score
- 26,408
I have little interest in the Naval Projects forum, so it's not that well "policed" as other sections.
Investigating a series of posts by "able" of (self-built?) model pictures for moderation, it is clear that this section is cluttered with a lot of user artwork.
The rules of the forum are reasonably clear. The Projects sections are primarily for original company documents, pictures and models. Drawings and information published by magazines or other reputable sources which might not be original per se are OK too. Posting self-made or fan-made drawings or models just muddies the waters.
Occasionally a researcher does a serious attempt at a drawing of a project which doesn't have a drawing available. This is allowable in the main topic. However, if real drawings exist, then there would not be a need for this.
There are separate sections for fan drawings and models which preserve the distinction between real sources and other material.
What are your thoughts?
Investigating a series of posts by "able" of (self-built?) model pictures for moderation, it is clear that this section is cluttered with a lot of user artwork.
The rules of the forum are reasonably clear. The Projects sections are primarily for original company documents, pictures and models. Drawings and information published by magazines or other reputable sources which might not be original per se are OK too. Posting self-made or fan-made drawings or models just muddies the waters.
Occasionally a researcher does a serious attempt at a drawing of a project which doesn't have a drawing available. This is allowable in the main topic. However, if real drawings exist, then there would not be a need for this.
There are separate sections for fan drawings and models which preserve the distinction between real sources and other material.
What are your thoughts?