Northrop F-15

Stargazer2006

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
13,225
Reaction score
807
Here's the best I've got. They are both of the second prototype, which was designated XF-15A:
 

Attachments

  • XF-15A.jpg
    XF-15A.jpg
    574.7 KB · Views: 488
  • XF-15A_.jpg
    XF-15A_.jpg
    362.1 KB · Views: 473

Steve Pace

Aviation History Writer
Joined
Jan 6, 2013
Messages
2,268
Reaction score
60
I'll print them at the drug store and scan them at 600dpi. That should do the trick. Thanks!
 

Steve Pace

Aviation History Writer
Joined
Jan 6, 2013
Messages
2,268
Reaction score
60
I'm writing a magazine article re the Reporter and I need high res images.
 

mz

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
676
Reaction score
20
:eek:
Resize the images with some nice algorithm in photoshop, gimp or xnview to get a larger but nonpixelated picture.
 

Orionblamblam

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
8,641
Reaction score
2,871
Website
www.aerospaceprojectsreview.com
mz said:
:eek:
Resize the images with some nice algorithm in photoshop, gimp or xnview to get a larger but nonpixelated picture.

Indeed. This is one of the photos scaled up by a factor of three and some digital camera noise removal done. There is only so much that can be done towards improving the apparent resolution of a small digital image... but printing it out and rescanning seems an odd and certainly lossy way to go about it.

EDIT: also added a comparison... the lower part is the image scaled up 3X with "smart sizing" and digital camera noise removal; the upper part is the image scaled up with just basic pixel resizing. Printing & rescanning would give you something closer to the upper image. The lower image still kinda sucks, but it's worlds better.
 

Attachments

  • XF-15Acomp.jpg
    XF-15Acomp.jpg
    164.4 KB · Views: 238
  • XF-15A-X3.jpg
    XF-15A-X3.jpg
    1,009.8 KB · Views: 161

Orionblamblam

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
8,641
Reaction score
2,871
Website
www.aerospaceprojectsreview.com
XB-70 Guy said:
You're right of course.
God.png


OF COURSE!!!
 

Steve Pace

Aviation History Writer
Joined
Jan 6, 2013
Messages
2,268
Reaction score
60
You're too funny. BTW: The XF-15 image looks like it might have been retouched (air brushed) or something.
 

aim9xray

ACCESS: Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2007
Messages
633
Reaction score
424
That's because the digital smoothing has also smoothed the grain of the photo that you are subconsciously expecting to see. Of course this image had already been stepped on several times with the consequent buildup in grain and contrast . I'll bet that a print made directly from the original 4x5 negative shot by Roy Wolford would be exquisite.
 

Apteryx

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Sep 28, 2007
Messages
152
Reaction score
20
XB-70 Guy said:
You're too funny. BTW: The XF-15 image looks like it might have been retouched (air brushed) or something.
That plan view photo is one of my all-time favorite images. It's too good to be (entirely) true. I've seen two versions of this picture: the one reproduced in this thread, with the diaphanous clouds, and another, which has no clouds, and on which the spinning props are much more visible. Sorry I can't put my hand on this other shot, though--if I find it I'll post it.
 

Stargazer2006

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
13,225
Reaction score
807
Oh, I definitely agree with you on that. The image I posted shows dubious black outlining ahead of the trailing edge and rudder. This must have been an inhouse touch-up job for promotional purposes. If you can find the original picture, it could be interesting for comparison...
 

Apteryx

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Sep 28, 2007
Messages
152
Reaction score
20
Stargazer2006 said:
Oh, I definitely agree with you on that. The image I posted shows dubious black outlining ahead of the trailing edge and rudder. This must have been an inhouse touch-up job for promotional purposes. If you can find the original picture, it could be interesting for comparison...

See attached images. Compare and contrast.

--Ian
 

Attachments

  • compare.jpg
    compare.jpg
    142.7 KB · Views: 455

Jemiba

Moderator
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
8,344
Reaction score
1,504
The article probably is already finished quite a while, nevertheless :
(from InterAvia June 1946)
 

Attachments

  • Northrop_F-15_Reporter_10.JPG
    Northrop_F-15_Reporter_10.JPG
    74.2 KB · Views: 425
  • Northrop_F-15_Reporter_12.JPG
    Northrop_F-15_Reporter_12.JPG
    102.7 KB · Views: 152
  • Northrop_F-15_Reporter_11.JPG
    Northrop_F-15_Reporter_11.JPG
    40 KB · Views: 143
  • Northrop_F-15_Reporter_13.JPG
    Northrop_F-15_Reporter_13.JPG
    100.2 KB · Views: 152

oz rb fan

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
Jan 5, 2010
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
this looks like the first pic with out the airbrushing
430691Northrop_F15_Reporter.jpg

and to think the last one survived till 1968.
7718L.jpg

the last survivor
 

Motocar

I really should change my personal text
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
679
Reaction score
221
Cutaway Norhtrop F-15, link

http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=23005.0;attach=562645;image
 

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
8,075
Reaction score
4,167

Attachments

  • 87-1.jpg
    87-1.jpg
    232.3 KB · Views: 54
  • 91-1.jpg
    91-1.jpg
    98.7 KB · Views: 61
  • 91-2.jpg
    91-2.jpg
    201.6 KB · Views: 60
  • 93-1.jpg
    93-1.jpg
    64 KB · Views: 63
  • 89-4.jpg
    89-4.jpg
    123.9 KB · Views: 68
Last edited:

Similar threads

Top