So, hacked the Russian cameras or snuck a drone in there?
I suspect the former.

*IIRC all Kilo-class.
Confirmed hacked.

Ukraine’s first underwater drone strike caught on hacked cameras​


PaleBlue Delivers ROV Simulator to the French Navy​


SEA to deliver KraitArray sonar for Liquid Robotics Wave Glider​

 
Last edited:

A german article on the recent Novorossiysk UUV attack has some interesting slides (afaik not published before), showcasing the different toloka variants:
 

Attachments

  • IMG-20251218-WA0001.jpg
    IMG-20251218-WA0001.jpg
    95.9 KB · Views: 19
  • IMG-20251218-WA0004.jpg
    IMG-20251218-WA0004.jpg
    198.8 KB · Views: 20
  • IMG-20251217-WA0003-Kopie.jpg
    IMG-20251217-WA0003-Kopie.jpg
    63.7 KB · Views: 20
  • IMG-20251218-WA00001-Kopie.jpg
    IMG-20251218-WA00001-Kopie.jpg
    61 KB · Views: 22

Navy's new RAS office prioritizes 'Dragonfish' UUV to accelerate Replicator-era program​

 

Autonomous submarine XV Excalibur handed to Royal Navy​


Exail wins new order for several hundred K-STER underwater drones​

 
View: https://x.com/NavyLookout/status/2009587104519508310?s=20

Babcock pitches Type 31 frigate as command platform for uncrewed systems​


View: https://x.com/Saronic/status/2009704113366303110?s=20
 
Last edited:
Adapable Deck Launching System sown onboard USVs.

View: https://x.com/lfx160219/status/2011265457400274948?s=20


 

Official: 45% of Navy's surface force to be unmanned by 2045​


Qatari firm Performance Marine unveils Ghost 7 USV, aims for sea trials this year​

 
Last edited:

UMEX total deals reach $980 million, navies seek 3D-printed USVs​


Qatari companies unveil new USVs as Iran skips 2026 DIMDEX naval expo​

 
Last edited:

Official: 45% of Navy's surface force to be unmanned by 2045​

I mean, if we assume that there are 3x unmanned "ASW XL-USVs" (think small frigates) per manned frigate, that's at least 70 extra-large USVs just from that.

If that expands to giving DDGs those same ASW XL-USVs, it'd be easy to get up to ~150 or more ships.
 
I mean, if we assume that there are 3x unmanned "ASW XL-USVs" (think small frigates) per manned frigate, that's at least 70 extra-large USVs just from that.

If that expands to giving DDGs those same ASW XL-USVs, it'd be easy to get up to ~150 or more ships.
This aligns well with our discussion on the sensor net arrangement. With 15 per carrier group and 11 groups that's 165 ships.
More are needed as a number will always require maintainance at port or the like. By rule of thumb some 10-20% more.
 
This aligns well with our discussion on the sensor net arrangement. With 15 per carrier group and 11 groups that's 165 ships.
More are needed as a number will always require maintainance at port or the like. By rule of thumb some 10-20% more.
Thing is, with USVs you don't need 3 hulls to have 1 at sea. You only need ~2 and change, though if you can afford 3 it means the same USVs always work with the same manned ships. This may be good for the quirks that computers develop based on hardware and software version interactions.

This also depends on how long the maintenance on USVs takes.
 

Video: Blue Water Autonomy Introduces Liberty-class Autonomous Ship​

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFR-L88a2nk

STEAMRACER-class USV Advances in Major U.S. Navy MASC Program​

 

Taiwan should create drone swarm ‘asymmetric hellscape’ to blunt Chinese invasion: Report​

 

Taiwan should create drone swarm ‘asymmetric hellscape’ to blunt Chinese invasion: Report​


If the Taiwanese are smart they'll already be quietly talking to the Ukrainians about naval drones.
 
It seems I originally posted this in the wrong thread by mistake. From a couple of days ago:

@covert_shores did a "hot take" (pun intended?) on this:

View: https://youtu.be/oNgLl0y9Fpk




 

Australia to get 40 more Bluebottle unmanned surface vessels​


Kraken wins Royal Navy contract to deliver 20 USV​

 
At the NATO REPMUS/Dynamic Messenger 2025 exercises off the coast of Portugal, a multinational team under Ukrainian command, acting as the “opposing force,” defeated the Alliance’s forces, winning all five scenarios targeting ports and convoys, as reported by FAZ

The main outcome of the maneuvers was the simulated destruction of at least one NATO frigate, which “sank” because Alliance detection systems failed to notice the approach of fast unmanned strike vessels.

On the NATO (“Blue”) side were American, British, Spanish, and other units, while the opposing (“Red”) side relied on Ukrainian Magura V7 naval drones in various configurations: one equipped with explosives, another with a heavy machine gun.

Victory was counted under the exercise rules as soon as the target was locked at close range, meaning it was enough to guide the drone onto the frigate or convoy ship before the enemy could detect it.

In one scenario, Ukrainian forces scored so many simulated hits on a frigate that, in a real battle, the ship would have sunk—yet the “Blue” crew was still asking in the general chat five minutes later whether the attack had even started.
 
It has just occurred to me that with the Gulf states (Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Dubai and UAE) approaching Ukraine for use of their drone-interceptors to deal with Iranian Shaheed drones they could also ask the Ukrainians for their help in deploying Magura drones to deal with IRGC speedboats causing problems in the straits of Hormuz.​
 
It has just occurred to me that with the Gulf states (Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Dubai and UAE) approaching Ukraine for use of their drone-interceptors to deal with Iranian Shaheed drones they could also ask the Ukrainians for their help in deploying Magura drones to deal with IRGC speedboats causing problems in the straits of Hormuz.​
Maybe the machine gun version would benefit from some AI targeting system similar to that used with some of the UAVs, to compensate for comms delays.
 
Turkish firm develops new-gen kamikaze drone boat

1774081292614.jpg
 

Kraken Robotics Demonstrates KATFISH Autonomous Launch and Recovery from SEFINE USV​


View: https://x.com/NOELreports/status/2041472345391452638?s=20
 
Last edited:
It seems I originally posted this in the wrong thread by mistake. From a couple of days ago:
It appears that to me that a moderately funded nation can really inflict large naval losses while being extremely difficult to stop with current naval defenses.

Just smuggle USVs or even better, UUVs with standard ISO containers everywhere and just home AIS. (maybe just move parts and assemble on site) There isn't remotely enough escorts without hugely inefficient convoying. Equipping transports with sensors and weapons is also hugely problematic.

Imagine the level of FUBAR this can inflict when the budget of a large naval warship is thrown at such a plan.
 
It’s the same across all forms of combat: the cheap automated platform can be smaller and hard to detect and then inflict disproportionate damage. PGMs of all kinds are also able to do similar things, thanks to low cost and precision. It is incredibly destabilizing because it tends to reward the offense and in particular, the side that strikes first.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom