Me P1101-102 Advise Please

Flitzer

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
28 October 2006
Messages
1,004
Reaction score
116
Hi All.
I'm currently trying to do a profile of the Me P1101-102.
The only reference I have is Heinz Rode's beautiful illustration on page 110 in Luftwaffe Secret Projects - Strategic Bombers 1935 - 1945.

I've borrowed a few keyline shapes from the P1101- 103 and think I would have been better off using the general fuselage/tail shape of the 101.
The top view seems okay but I'm not happy with the side view.

Any suggestions or other references anyone may point me to?

Many thanks in advance.
Peter
 

Attachments

  • Me P1101 103.jpg
    Me P1101 103.jpg
    148.3 KB · Views: 470
Can't say something about the shape of the tail, but I think, the position of the rear
lateral guns should be checked. To my opinion, they are either too low on the fuselage,
or the mountings would have to protrude quite far from the fuselage, probably making the
installation aerodynamically unsound. I've tried to sketch, what I mean : Black is the position,
the guns are shown in side- and upper side view, red is, what the cross section of an installation
as shown would be (severely limiting gun movement) and green, the position the guns could be.
Things of course would change, if the rear fuselage would be pear shaped, but I cannot see any hint
for that.
 

Attachments

  • rear_gun.GIF
    rear_gun.GIF
    27.3 KB · Views: 317
Many thanks Jemiba.

A great help.
I'd just plopped the lateral guns there as a more or less place while I concentrated on the overall fuselage shape. But it is of invaluable help or will be when I do the final detailing.

Also I must admit I must be going blind or dense or both. At the top of the same page is a basic 3-view of the 102. Not much in the way of detail.
I completely overlooked it as I thought it was a part of the 103 next to it. Just call me daft.
At least I have the general shape and proportions now and that is what I was looking for.
On the plus side I'm happy to see the top view is not too far away from what it should be.

Many thanks again for taking the trouble to illustrate, much appreciated.

Cheers
Peter
;D
 
The photos and drawings originate from Marek Murawski " Samoloty Luftwaffe " t. 2.
The Messerschmitt P.1101 differs a little from that of Yours, but I can't help
as I'm interesting only in those Luftwaffe aircraft with RLM numeration system.
If don't understand anything of Polish captions I translate it for You :)

In addition I enclose drawings of Messerschmitt P.1110 and Messerschmitt P.1111.
 

Attachments

  • Messerschmitt P.1111.jpg
    Messerschmitt P.1111.jpg
    381.8 KB · Views: 181
  • Messerschmitt P.1110.jpg
    Messerschmitt P.1110.jpg
    458.3 KB · Views: 226
  • Messerschmitt P.1101 ( rys. 2 ).jpg
    Messerschmitt P.1101 ( rys. 2 ).jpg
    100.9 KB · Views: 227
  • Messerschmitt P.1101 ( rys. 1 ).jpg
    Messerschmitt P.1101 ( rys. 1 ).jpg
    201.9 KB · Views: 334
  • Messerschmitt P.1101 ( fot. 2 ).jpg
    Messerschmitt P.1101 ( fot. 2 ).jpg
    224.3 KB · Views: 299
  • Messerschmitt P.1101 ( fot. 1 ).jpg
    Messerschmitt P.1101 ( fot. 1 ).jpg
    120.8 KB · Views: 317
Some help here (Post-1)
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0002.jpg
    Escanear0002.jpg
    72.3 KB · Views: 181
  • Escanear0004.jpg
    Escanear0004.jpg
    57.2 KB · Views: 126
  • Escanear0003.jpg
    Escanear0003.jpg
    246.6 KB · Views: 135
Some help here (Post-2)
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0005.jpg
    Escanear0005.jpg
    91.4 KB · Views: 168
  • Escanear0007.jpg
    Escanear0007.jpg
    37.7 KB · Views: 142
Some help here (Post-3)
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0010.jpg
    Escanear0010.jpg
    133.4 KB · Views: 160
  • Escanear0009.jpg
    Escanear0009.jpg
    120.7 KB · Views: 176
  • Escanear0008.jpg
    Escanear0008.jpg
    110.7 KB · Views: 211
  • Escanear0006.jpg
    Escanear0006.jpg
    167.1 KB · Views: 206
Wow.
Many thanks.

Boogey
Cesc
There was another series of P1101 besides the fighter you kindly show. The other P1101's were bomber concepts.
And if I get stuck for Polish translation I will take you up on your kind offer. My wife is Polish so it will be anything aeronautical she might not understand, even in Popolsku.

Djenki
(My spelling is poor, but I know piwo ;)).

Justo.
What can I say? Always to my rescue. Many thanks.

I think I've cracked it now. I'm working on the more accurate version as we speak (or is it type?). I'll post when keylined.

Many thanks again.
Peter
 
Re-worked top view.
A much more elegant design than I first thought and my first attempt of course.

Side view soon.

Many thanks
Peter
 

Attachments

  • 102 Latest.jpg
    102 Latest.jpg
    157.6 KB · Views: 137
@ Flitzer You're
welcome.gif
, I'm always Yours to command
smile062.gif


Please, say to Your wife : POZDROWIENIA OD BOOGEY'EGO Z WARSZAWY.
 
Hi again

I've now done a new side view, which should be a bit more accurate.

Boogey
I certainly will, when I see her.
She's in Warszawa visiting her parents at the moment.

Cheers
Peter
 

Attachments

  • 102SIDE.jpg
    102SIDE.jpg
    85.4 KB · Views: 180
Thank you Son Altesse.

I've got a little further with it and will post soon.

I've been overlooking the profiles a little recently due to me fending for myself in my wifes' absence.
You know...go to work, come home, see to Patch the cat, cook and feed myself and get stuck in on lots of little jobs around the house and garden. ;) ;D

Peter
 
As promised
How far I've got.

Many thanks
Peter
 

Attachments

  • MEP1101 102 PROF..jpg
    MEP1101 102 PROF..jpg
    215.5 KB · Views: 207
I also have a few questions concerning the Me P1101 - 104 if I may ask?

I'm a little stumped to how the panels around the twinned engine cowlings would look?
I'm also not quite sure how they merge into the wing?
Ringed on pic.

Any suggestions please?
Many thanks.
Peter
 

Attachments

  • MEP1101-104PROF.jpg
    MEP1101-104PROF.jpg
    181 KB · Views: 186
Some help here (Post-1)
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0001.jpg
    Escanear0001.jpg
    103.9 KB · Views: 207
  • Escanear0002.jpg
    Escanear0002.jpg
    159.5 KB · Views: 275
  • Escanear0003.jpg
    Escanear0003.jpg
    150.6 KB · Views: 227
Some help here (Post-2)
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0007.jpg
    Escanear0007.jpg
    129.7 KB · Views: 109
  • Escanear0006.jpg
    Escanear0006.jpg
    56.2 KB · Views: 95
  • Escanear0005.jpg
    Escanear0005.jpg
    78.8 KB · Views: 142
  • Escanear0004.jpg
    Escanear0004.jpg
    87.6 KB · Views: 154
Bravo Justo.

Brilliant. Once again many thanks.
Peter
;D
 
Another work in progress report, this time the BV P192.

Not sure about the air intake/exhaust position, using DB603G?

Alternative power plant being Jumo 213E.

Any advice gratefully received.

Many thanks
Peter
 

Attachments

  • 2BV P192SIDE.jpg
    2BV P192SIDE.jpg
    141.4 KB · Views: 195
Re, BV 192 illustration: The Intake/Exhaust positions would be about right for the DB 603 engines; but i have several reservations.
Fistly - and this may be "artistic license" on your part - you illustrate the aircraft in the livery of a "Nachtjager"; in which case, one would expect flame eliminators to be covering the exhausts. Also, the squadron emblem is of KG 51 (KampfGeschweder 51) "Edelweiss" - a bomber group. One would expect a Nachjager to be assigned to an "NJG" (NachtJagdGeschweder) or night-fighter group (eg. Njg 1); not a bomber group.
Secondly - and purely aesthetically - the illustration just doesn't "look like" a BV design; it's not "Kooky" enough. It looks more like a hybrid Junkers (88G - like nose section) and Arado (234 - like tail section) design... but still on the right track for a "Nachtjager".
Finally - and more technically - i'm not sure i understand the engineering: your illustration seems to show an aircraft with a single propellor wrapped around the fuselage; cool for minimizing drag (as in the theory behind the He 177). However WWII period engines - even the German ones - were not so "high revving"; so, to transfer revs to the prop (as i understand the illustration) would be the Devil's own task, engineering-wise.
Given the penchant - very finally - of the RLM to specify that any bomber should be able to dive-bomb at at least 30 to 60 degrees... don't you reckon that it would be a tad impractical to centrally mount an SC 250-500 bomb just behind the propellor?
 
Hi Bodmas,
thanks for the input.
With regards to the scheme, this one was just me playing with patterns and colours. It's pure accident it looks like a Nactjager. I'll reserve this scheme for a proper night fighter project.

The emblem again was just stuck on for position/effect at this stage. I'll source a dive bomber/ground attack unit one, maybe from a Stuka squadron. But if you have a more apt JG emblem tucked away somewhere I would be truly grateful.

The mid fuselage prop position is as the basic 3-view drawings as is everything else. Your comments are probably spot on but I just add flesh and colour to the 'bare bones' of these project sketches. I try to do them as found, warts, faults and all.
I'll post the 3-views I've done.
It was a Bv design but didn't get any further than the drawing board. The bomb position is as suggested by the original 3-view drawings. But I believe you may be right. Maybe two smaller underwing mounted bombs would be better.

Many thanks
Peter
;D
 
Additional info
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0001.jpg
    Escanear0001.jpg
    142.9 KB · Views: 163
  • Escanear0002.jpg
    Escanear0002.jpg
    99.6 KB · Views: 171
  • Escanear0003.jpg
    Escanear0003.jpg
    106.8 KB · Views: 189
Here Edelweiss emblem from Aufklärungsgruppe 14
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0002.jpg
    Escanear0002.jpg
    275.8 KB · Views: 100
  • Escanear0001.jpg
    Escanear0001.jpg
    19.1 KB · Views: 86
Wow...Justo you are so quick and never cease to amaze.
Many thanks.
So the Edelweiss emblem is okay for a Bv192?

For what it's worth here is my (colour corrected ;)) work in progress 3 view.

Many thanks again.
Peter
 

Attachments

  • 3VBVP192.jpg
    3VBVP192.jpg
    245.1 KB · Views: 158
So the Edelweiss emblem is okay for a Bv192?

No , Aufklärer means reconnaisance unit and Bv 192 is a dive bomber
 
Here some samples of desert stukas
 

Attachments

  • Escanear.jpg
    Escanear.jpg
    129 KB · Views: 106
  • Escanear0001.jpg
    Escanear0001.jpg
    366.2 KB · Views: 103
  • Escanear0002.jpg
    Escanear0002.jpg
    319.3 KB · Views: 100
Many thanks again Justo.
Plenty ideas there.

I've found a few also, looking through decal references from Ju87 and Hs129 sheets.
Interestingly I found night versions of the Ju 87 in dark greens scheme and a more normal greys one, so the first of my Bv 192 pics may be okay with flame eliminators and a change of emblem (?).

Best wishes
Peter
 
Nocturnal stukas here...
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0003.jpg
    Escanear0003.jpg
    79.3 KB · Views: 103
  • Escanear0002.jpg
    Escanear0002.jpg
    202.4 KB · Views: 85
  • Escanear0001.jpg
    Escanear0001.jpg
    507.2 KB · Views: 81
Again many thanks Justo.

Have applied some of these schemes already.


Peter
;D
 
A little confusion concerning the Fast Bomber Me P1101-104 or 105?

According to
Luftwafe Secret Projects Starategic Bombers 1935 - 1945
by Dieter Hering and Heinz Rode
it's '105'.
But in
Jet Planes of the 3rd Riech The Secret Projects
by Manered Griehl
the same aircraft is noted as being '104'.

Can anybody confirm which it is please?

Many thanks
Peter
 
Justo,
your opinion is always good enough for me.
104 it is.

Thank you.
Peter
 
If I remember correctly, one of Luftfahrt International issues deals with secret Messerschmitt projects and has 3-view drawings of the Me P.1101 and several others. I'm currently not in a position to scan it tho.
 
Thanks Ronnie.
I think I'm okay now, I have the 3-views etc and now I know which is which thanks to Justo.
Best regards
Peter
 
Anyone ever see this picture of the Messerschmitt P.1101 before? It's a new one for me.

Someone posted it here: https://m.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10209101309192452&id=1310529236&set=gm.1298585723501983&source=57
 

Attachments

  • 12095041_10209101309192452_3427400849117032397_o.jpg
    12095041_10209101309192452_3427400849117032397_o.jpg
    231.6 KB · Views: 240
A little Google fu and I have an actual page to go with the picture.

http://falkeeins.blogspot.com/2016/03/messerschmitt-p1101-prototype.html?m=1
 
- On January 10,1945 Hitler proposed to Göring that a 50-mm anti-tank cannon be fitted to the Arado Ar 234 jet bomber.

The Luftwaffe was already using Rheinmetall-Borsig BK 5 (Bord Kanone) automatic cannons mounted in Messerschmitt Me 410 A-2/U4 heavy fighters.

The 50-mm BK 5 was a very powerful weapon capable of disintegrating any Allied aircraft with a single shot.

Its great range would allow attacks on well defended formations of US bombers while the fighter remained a healthy distance from the defensive crossfire of American gunners, although the excessive weight of the cannon prevented the Me 410 from escaping the escort fighters.

Between February and April 1944, the 53 Me 410s of II./ZG 26 achieved some successes against the B-17 and B-24 heavy bombers, but nine fighters were shot down by escorts P-51 D in a single day and the Gruppe was disbanded.

Unfortunately for the Germans, the powerful recoil of the available heavy cannons caused structural damage to single-engine fighters and large aircraft of the Ju 88, Do 217 and Me 410 types were not fast enough.

BK 5 (50-mm) cannon technical data

Developed from the KWK 391 anti-tank cannon.

Ammunition: 22 rounds belt-fed 50 x 419 R.

Pneumatic operation system.

Weight: 520 kg. Length: 3.79 m. Rate of fire: 45-50 rpm.

Mounted in Me 410 A-2/U4, Ju 88 P-1, Ju 288 and He 177.

To carry out Hitler's order, the OKL preferred to use the new 50-mm cannon Mauser MK 214 A (Maschinen Kanone), which weighed 50 kg less than the BK 5 and tripled its rate of fire.

To test the concept, two Messerschmitt Me 262 jet fighters (Werk. Nr. 111899 and 170083) were modified as Me 262 A-1a/U4, with the only two nose mounted MK 214 prototypes available.

Between 20 February and March 23, 1945, the first modified aircraft flew several test flights and two operational missions, without good results.

Production of the operational version of the Me 262 E-1 was dropped in favor of the Ruhrstahl-Kramer X-4 air-to-air guided missile that was already in the testing phase installed on the Me 262 Werk. Nr. 111994.

Also cancelled were the ground attack aircraft Arado Ar 234 C-3/R4 and the high-altitude heavy fighter Ar 234 D-3, which were to use an MK 214 A housed in the ventral nacelle.

The development of this cannon was only completed in March 1945 and the war in Europe was over before series production could get under way.

MK 214A (50-mm) cannon technical data

Developed from the PaK 38 anti-tank cannon

Ammunition: Belt-fed 50 x 419 R.

Panzergranate 40 armor piercing. Sprenggranate L-spur explosive. Minengesschos L-spur m-zerleger.

Weight: 490 kg. Length: 4.16 m. Muzzle velocity: 920 m/sec. Rate of fire: 150 rpm.

The Rheinmetall-Borsig MK 112/55 heavy cannon of the short range/fast firing class, was a scaled-up version of the MK 108/30 standard. The type weighed 300 kg, only fifteen prototypes were built but none was used in combat.

MK 112 (55-mm) cannon technical data

Weight: 300 kg. Length: 2 m. Muzzle velocity: 594 m/sec. Rate of fire: 300 rpm.

Ammunition: Belt-fed 55 x 175 RB

Between the end of May and the beginning of June 1944, Messerschmitt proposed to the OKL the construction of various types of heavy fighters, armed with 55 and 75-mm cannons. In order to compete for the new HeS 011 turbojets associated with the Jägernotprogramm, these designs were given project number P 1101.

The P 1101 (Drawing XVIII-92) of May 1944 was a two-seat, with 50-degrees swept wings and “V” tail, powered by two HeS 011 turbojets.

Messerschmitt P 1101-92 technical data

Wingspan: 13.28 m. Length: 13.10 m. Height: 4.10 m. Wing Area: 35 sq. m. Max Speed: 900 km/h. Power Plant: two wing-mounted HeS 011 turbojets each rated at 1,300 kg static thrust. Armament: one nose mounted Rheinmetall Borsig BK 7.5 anti-tank cannon with 12 shot rotating magazine and Zielfenrohr 4x telescopic gunsight.

BK 7.5 (75-mm) cannon technical data

Developed from the PaK 40 anti-tank cannon

Ammunition: drum-fed 75 x 714 R.

Weight: 705 kg. Length: 10.5 m. Muzzle velocity: 705 m/sec. Rate of fire: 30-35 rpm.



The P 1101 (Drawing XVIII-99) of June 6,1944 was a two-seat Zerstörer, with 45-degrees swept wings and tail, powered by four HeS 011 turbojets.

P 1101-99 technical data

Wingspan: 15.20 m. Length: 15.40 m. Height: 4.90 m. Wing Area: 47 sq. m. Max Weight: 18,600 kg. Max Speed: 960 km/h. Power Plant: four wing-mounted HeS 011 turbojets each rated at 1,300 kg static thrust. Armament: one nose mounted Rheinmetall Borsig BK 7.5 anti-tank cannon with 12 shot rotating magazine and Zielfenrohr 4x telescopic gunsight, one 55-mm Rheinmetall Borsig MK 112 cannon mounted in the starboard wing root and four MK 112 cannons mounted in the fuselage in Schräge Musik configuration.

The Rheinmetall-Borsig MK 112 cannon was basically a scaled-up MK 108 with 300 rpm and 275 kg weight. Used by the Fw 190 A-8 works no. 170002 as suicide ramming aircraft prototype for the Selbstopfermänner units.

The P 1101 (Drawing XVIII-104) of June 1,1944 was a two-seat Zerstörer, with 50/37-degrees cranked swept wings and “V” tail, powered by four HeS 011 turbojets.

P 1101-104 technical data

Wingspan: 17.35 m. Length: 18.10 m. Height: 4.10 m. Max Speed: 860 km/h. Power Plant: four wing-mounted HeS 011turbojets, each rated at 1,300 kg static thrust. Armament: one nose mounted Rheinmetall Borsig BK 7.5 anti-tank cannon with 12 shot rotating magazine and Zielfenrohr 4x telescopic gunsight, three nose mounted 30-mm Rheinmetall Borsig MK 108 cannons, three fuselage mounted MK 108 cannons in Schräge Musik configuration and one rear-firing MK 108 cannon mounted in the tail barbette.
 

Attachments

  • 10000.jpg
    10000.jpg
    403.9 KB · Views: 16
  • 10001.jpg
    10001.jpg
    315.6 KB · Views: 13
  • 10002.jpg
    10002.jpg
    316.1 KB · Views: 12
  • 100003.jpg
    100003.jpg
    188.4 KB · Views: 13
  • 100005.jpg
    100005.jpg
    374.5 KB · Views: 15
  • 100004.jpg
    100004.jpg
    94.1 KB · Views: 14
  • 100006.jpg
    100006.jpg
    196.8 KB · Views: 14
  • 100007.jpg
    100007.jpg
    255.7 KB · Views: 9
  • 100008.jpg
    100008.jpg
    297.9 KB · Views: 11
  • 100009.jpg
    100009.jpg
    266.7 KB · Views: 18

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom