Major incidednt at RAF Fairford, oddly NOT on the bleep bleep cee.

Foo Fighter said:
When/how many incidents on the CONUS?
Click to expand...
Not many.

There's occasionally the idiot that tries to run the gate at a base. That probably happens once a month but it's rare that it makes the news.

Much more rarely, someone goes active shooter, but that does not work well on base since that [expletives deleted] Hassan shot up Fort Hood. Now it's very likely for the shooter to be charged by everyone within hearing distance of the event, whether everyone happens to be carrying actual weapons or is improvising. Kinda like what happens on a plane when stupid happens, but where everyone is physically fit and most are trained in some flavor of combatives, so the beatdown is a lot harder, with no consideration for the structural integrity of any surrounding structures or the concrete they stand on. "Hit the attacker with the planet until he stops moving" is the standard response recommendation. Those do make the news, but there have been less than 1 per year, only 20 since 1993.
 
Last edited:
I could find nothing on the bleep bleep cee when I looked online or on the idiot box. Nobody here had a clue, despite being under one of their approach routes.
 
Re-arrested now on suspicion of preparing a Terrorist act.

Hybrid warfare?
 
targetpractice said:
Why can't you say BBC?
Click to expand...
Usually comes from assumption that it's 'biased', where that usually means 'doesn't share my biases'.

So far as I can tell the BBC talks utter rubbish at about the same rate as other news outlets.
Flyaway said:
Re-arrested now on suspicion of preparing a Terrorist act.
Click to expand...
Presumably the Explosives Act charges are easier to demonstrate on the spot.
 
Flyaway said:
Re-arrested now on suspicion of preparing a Terrorist act.

Hybrid warfare?
Click to expand...

If so, it seems far more likely to have been Iran-linked than Russian. There have been quite a few instances of actual Iran-linked terrorist acts in recent years, many of them attacks on Jewish targets in the West. This would be an escalation, but hardly unprecedented.
 
Also the terrorism laws allow for arrest and detention for 14 days without charge, against 24 hours iirc
 
Yellow Palace said:
Presumably the Explosives Act charges are easier to demonstrate on the spot.
Click to expand...
The BBC News Channel had an interview with a former National Counter-Terrorism Coordinator, IIRC he said terrorism arrests require an element of motive - either directed at the government, a foreign government or at the population to cause terror. So Explosives Act arrests can be done on the spot and then you rearrest under the Terrorism Act later when you decide there's sufficient evidence of motive.
 
Oh, and for anyone listening to Trump claiming 'it's great cooperation, we had them under surveillance', that's not the story we're hearing in the UK. Which is that the arrests weren't the result of intelligence, but from someone phoning in a report to the police at 12:30AM (after getting no answer at Fairford) saying they'd seen three vans behaving suspiciously.
 
DWG said:
Oh, and for anyone listening to Trump claiming 'it's great cooperation, we had them under surveillance', that's not the story we're hearing in the UK. Which is that the arrests weren't the result of intelligence, but from someone phoning in a report to the police at 12:30AM (after getting no answer at Fairford) saying they'd seen three vans behaving suspiciously.
Click to expand...
That sounds like when the cops pull over a car for going 3 mph over the speed limit and just happen to find 50 kg of cocaine in the trunk. If they knew about the plan beforehand, when did the FPCON level at Fairford start going up?
 
targetpractice said:
Why can't you say BBC?
Click to expand...
Because after decades of mismanagement and so called 'factual reports' describing APC and crowd control vehicles as 'tanks' etc - and I include hitching a ride on a police rotary winged aircraft during the attempted arrest of a public figure breaking the law to do so they get nothing more than bleep bleep cee from me.

And THAT is me being polite. Direct enough?
 
southwestforests said:
Being one of those revolting colonials I had to look up where RAF Fairford is: current Google Maps image was taken while an airshow was in progress, looks to have been well attended.
Click to expand...
That would be RIAT*, it's the biggest non-trade show in the UK. Cancelled this year because Fairford was rather busy.

* Royal International Air Tattoo.
 
I'd expect something more elaborate from a state actors, at best loosely linked to paramilitary formations
 
Not James Stockdale said:
That sounds like when the cops pull over a car for going 3 mph over the speed limit and just happen to find 50 kg of cocaine in the trunk. If they knew about the plan beforehand, when did the FPCON level at Fairford start going up?
Click to expand...
I did see a comment on-line (but can't find it again now) that Fairfords alert was raised last week, and was higher than Lakenheath and Mildenhall, but nom proof of that sorry.

They have extended the corden (200-400M) and put in a no-fly zone, probably to give the teams on the ground a bit of privacy from the press
 
DWG said:
Oh, and for anyone listening to Trump claiming 'it's great cooperation, we had them under surveillance', that's not the story we're hearing in the UK. Which is that the arrests weren't the result of intelligence, but from someone phoning in a report to the police at 12:30AM (after getting no answer at Fairford) saying they'd seen three vans behaving suspiciously.
Click to expand...
Yes, based on public statements in the UK we don't actually know that Fairford was the target. Trump claims it was, but he... usually requires some interpretation.
 
bob225 said:
I did see a comment on-line (but can't find it again now) that Fairfords alert was raised last week, and was higher than Lakenheath and Mildenhall, but nom proof of that sorry.

They have extended the corden (200-400M) and put in a no-fly zone, probably to give the teams on the ground a bit of privacy from the press
Click to expand...
I think this is the message in question;
https://twitter.com/x/status/2103934420143005917
View: https://x.com/DefenceGeek/status/2103934420143005917
.
 
Yellow Palace said:
Yes, based on public statements in the UK we don't actually know that Fairford was the target. Trump claims it was, but he... usually requires some interpretation.
Click to expand...
Do you think the truck bombs were just coincidentally within a few hundred meters of the US strategic bomber base that the IRGC has already publicly identified a target?
bobthemonkey said:
I think this is the message in question;
.
Click to expand...
If this tweet was published at 10:47 pm UK time yesterday and refers to FPCON Delta at that time and increased security measures over the past week, I don't think you can attribute the increased security to a civilian spotting the masked men at 12:30 am this morning.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yellow Palace said:
The UK's definition of 'terrorism' is sufficiently broad that I can think of at least half a dozen reasons why an attack targeting Fairford might fall under it.
Click to expand...

I was just responding to the "hybrid warfare" question, that is more often used to refer to Russian actions than Iranian ones. Though they are fairly similar in practice.
 
A heroic farmer saved a lot of lives. British intelligence services, completely MIA.
 
Not James Stockdale said:
If this tweet was published at 10:47 pm UK time yesterday and refers to FPCON Delta at that time and increased security measures over the past week, I don't think you can attribute the increased security to a civilian spotting the masked men at 12:30 am this morning.
Click to expand...
True, but nor can you necessarily attribute the arrests to the increased security. You can have indications of an imminent attack without the specifics of when.
 
This thread just moments ago proved to be of practical use in an unexpected way -- had called my 86 year old parents, Dad a retired USN officer, and talked to Mom while Dad had gone to nap after the Kansas City Chiefs game (they won) & Mom asked if I'd heard about people being arrested for terrorism at a UK airport ...
... I said, yes I have, gimme just a second, and since I was using the landline phone at the PC desk, pulled up this thread and relayed some bits of info from the posts.
:)
 
Not James Stockdale said:
Do you think the truck bombs were just coincidentally within a few hundred meters of the US strategic bomber base that the IRGC has already publicly identified a target?
Click to expand...
I think it's reasonable supposition, but still supposition. Even if Fairford was the target, I can think of at least three or four possible motivations, and at least one of them has nothing to do with any foreign power.
 
EmoBirb said:
I'd expect something more elaborate from a state actors, at best loosely linked to paramilitary formations
Click to expand...
TomS said:
I was just responding to the "hybrid warfare" question, that is more often used to refer to Russian actions than Iranian ones.
Click to expand...

While it's certainly possible that this was something organised by the IRGC my first thought was if this was an attack using local proxies organised by the SVR or GRU in an example of Putin's hybrid-warfare.
 
NMaude said:
While it's certainly possible that this was something organised by the IRGC my first thought was if this was an attack using local proxies organised by the SVR or GRU in an example of Putin's hybrid-warfare.
Click to expand...

Why? RAF Fairford has no obvious linkage to the war in Ukraine but a clear one to the war against Iran.

And there are many known instances of Iran using local proxies in lethal plots in Europe.

https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/mapping-iranian-external-operations-worldwide
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom