• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Lockheed Skunk Works 1993-1998 NGLRV SSTO program - roots of X-33

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,046
Reaction score
876
http://www.affordablespaceflight.com/nasa1.html
http://www.affordablespaceflight.com/nasa2.html

"The following presentation was given at a NASA sponsored conference at the University of Alabama in Huntsville during the week of February 23 1998. The presentation shown here was cleared for public release and was included in the published proceedings for that conference."

"Five years ago the Skunk Works began a long term project whose purpose is to explore the feasibility of designing, building and operating a market driven, commercially funded, commercial launch service that is affordable to build, profitable to operate, low enough in user cost that it allows the market to grow, and can grow with the market.

The only technology constraint placed on the program is that it utilize existing or near term technology. There are no requirements regarding propulsion systems, propellant types, operating modes, or number of stages placed on this study. It is our thought that the requirements of minimizing the size of the initial investment, operating at a profit with the lowest possible user cost, and having built-in evolutionary growth potential would be more than adequate as selection criteria.

In Phase 1 of this study we investigated rocket-powered launch vehicles. Included in this were Vertical Take-Off Horizontal Landing (VTOHL), Vertical Take-Off Vertical Landing (VTOVL), and Horizontal Take-Off Horizontal Landing (HTOHL). All three were examined for both Single Stage To Orbit (SSTO) and Two Stage To Orbit (TSTO) flight. The results of this work were turned over to what became the X-33 program.

Since then we have been investigating air-breathing launch vehicle. As before, we will be investigating VTOHL, VTOVL, and HTOHL. All three will be examined for SSTO and TSTO flight."
 

Attachments

  • np01.jpg
    np01.jpg
    41.1 KB · Views: 200
  • np03.jpg
    np03.jpg
    65.5 KB · Views: 200
  • asscent.jpg
    asscent.jpg
    43.8 KB · Views: 177
  • np09.jpg
    np09.jpg
    53.3 KB · Views: 168
  • np17.jpg
    np17.jpg
    45.2 KB · Views: 149
  • np15.jpg
    np15.jpg
    51.6 KB · Views: 57
  • desent.jpg
    desent.jpg
    69.9 KB · Views: 66
  • np04b.jpg
    np04b.jpg
    239 KB · Views: 119

mz

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
676
Reaction score
8
Fascinating, the performance figures especially. Thanks for the great finds flateric, enjoyed the SR-71 stuff you linked to too.

This the same Eagle Sarmont?
http://www.geocities.com/pterodactylclub/EagleSarmont.html

:p
 
L

Lee

Guest
I previously printed off a copy of both these 'Web pages and I'm glad to see them here.
The design reminds me of the old NASP from about '68 with the pointed nose and small wings. Designers later used a square nose and scramjets amidships. This version here also uses scramjets which need Mach 6-8 to start and then require immense air intakes above---say---150,000 ft. I think.
Using slush H2 would also make the whole plane bigger compared to liquid methane and especially JP-4. At least that's what I read is both Govt reports and academic research papers. I could look at home for these to refresh my memory, but that was the gist of their conclusions at the end of those papers.
 

Similar threads

Top