a. SOFIA doesn't have a radar,
Sofia has the usual 747 radars. Weather, etc.

c. NASA probes have around 1m mirrors and use the main comm antenna as radar or attach radar to solar arrays.
d. KH-11 has 2.5 to 3 m mirrors and radar sats have dishes around 50 feet.

Sweet, let's attach a 50ft radar array to the solar panels on an optical satellite.



a 96 minute sun synchronous orbit (15 orbits per day) would have a repeating ground track. This means for coverage at the equator (528 miles between ground tracks), there needs to be 6 satellites per orbit for 105 total.
I'm not asking for 6 birds per orbit. Only enough birds to put one of 3 tracks per 1056 miles staggered to have one of those 3 tracks able to point at a target within 15 min. I think that's 3 birds per orbit, if we can stagger the orbits. 45. More than I thought, admittedly.

Slant images!
 
Sofia has the usual 747 radars. Weather, etc.
Do they "see" cars and trucks and other vehicles without transponders?
A space based radar needs a large antenna because it is far away
Sweet, let's attach a 50ft radar array to the solar panels on an optical satellite.
Not feasible. It isn't a science probe looking for water beneath ice for a few hours of a 2 to 3 week orbit. Radar and solar array will have conflicting pointing requirements on spy sat.
I'm not asking for 6 birds per orbit. Only enough birds to put one of 3 tracks per 1056 miles staggered to have one of those 3 tracks able to point at a target within 15 min. I think that's 3 birds per orbit, if we can stagger the orbits. 45. More than I thought, admittedly.

Slant images!
Slant image won't be any better than Starlink. To get the best images, the optical path through the atmosphere has to be minimized. 528 miles between ground tracks the same as the max swath for each satellite. max slant range is around 500 miles.
 
Last edited:
Sweet, let's attach a 50ft radar array to the solar panels on an optical satellite.
It can be done but you get the "too many eggs in one basket" problem. With launch costs dropping significantly, its just better to do multiple small sats than one big one.
 
Tangentially related, but NRO has put up 140+ of its proffered constellation in 7 launches starting last May. We are just about due for an eighth, unless the first increment has wrapped up.
 
"Dr. Garwin led a team of experts who foresaw a more advanced type of spacecraft that would replace film with microelectronics and radio transmitters. Fresh images would flash to Earth. The team also called for powerful new telescopes. In effect, the spy craft were to be precursors to the Hubble Space Telescope, but aimed at the Earth.

Even by the usual standards of federal secrecy, the satellite project was extremely hush-hush. In July 1971, Dr. Garwin had drafts of the final report delivered by a special class of courier to members of his team. They were required to read them, return them and keep no copies.

The next month, Dr. Garwin and a colleague briefed Kissinger, who backed the new electrooptical approach. Remarkably, the innovation was decades ahead of the shift in consumer cameras from film to digital.

That September, President Nixon approved a plan to develop the new spy satellite, which became the archetype for all that followed. For East-West relations, the technology was seen as raising predictability and lessening surprise, thus lowering tensions between the superpowers.

The next year, Nixon met in Moscow with the Soviet leader Leonid I. Brezhnev to sign an accord that, for the first time, limited their nuclear arsenals."

]https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/19/science/richard-garwin-hydrogen-bomb.html
 
The long road to near-real-time satellite reconnaissance: a chronology
by Dwayne A. Day
Monday, June 9, 2025

In late 1976, the United States Air Force launched a revolutionary top secret satellite from Vandenberg Air Force Base. Known as the KH-11 KENNEN and managed by the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), it was the first near-real-time reconnaissance satellite capable of transmitting imagery from around the globe nearly instantaneously. Up to this time, American reconnaissance satellites used film to take their photographs, meaning that it could be days to weeks from when an image was taken to when it was seen by intelligence analysts in Washington.

KENNEN changed that, giving reconnaissance satellites the ability to provide intelligence about events around the world within minutes. Just last week we saw how powerful this capability could be, with commercial satellite images of Russian airfields showing bombers destroyed by Ukrainian drones. It took a few days for that imagery to become public, but US intelligence agencies certainly had better imagery within hours of the attacks, provided by the descendants of the KENNEN satellites launched nearly a half century ago.

 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom