That would explain a lot, even if a warp engine would have been installed ! ;Dmrys said:Lets say, that it is made of mysterious material, discovered by german scientist in abandoned cloister somewhere in Himalaya
Indeed, but obviously it's retracting forwards, making matters even worse for a bomb bay in the fuselage.Michel Van said:note that main landing gear is different design to the scissor joint landing gear design
As long as we have only one sketch all detailed discussion about gears cinematics are only more or less logical speculation. On sketch way that gears are retracted is clear: main gears are retracted forward. But for housing whole mechanism gear bay have to be much longer then wheel boogies. Anyway for to be sure, that all works good we should design whole undercariage againJemiba said:I think, you should shorten the wheel well doors, at least for the shorter landing gear legs,mrys said:Lets say, that it is made of mysterious material, discovered by german scientist in abandoned cloister somewhere in Himalaya
they are too long, even if we take into account, that the oleos are shown in a compressed
state. For the main gear, I'm not sure abot the scissor joint. If it would retract in a more
common way rearwards, there would even be space available for a bomb bay.
The long gear on the Junkers 'Fernbo 45' is probably so it can take off with the nose high attitude so to avoid extremely long runs. The high height from the ground would be to avoid the wing tips scrapping during rotation.Jemiba said:Not sure, that for the Junkers bomber an external weapons carriage was envisaged, too.