Grey Havoc
ACCESS: USAP
- Joined
- 9 October 2009
- Messages
- 24,439
- Reaction score
- 17,905
The British wildcatters on the hunt for hydrogen
Modern tech has kickstarted a race for vast gas reserves hidden within the Earth’s crust
Sir Keir Starmer has overruled Ed Miliband by snubbing plans for a green energy plant in a major blow to the Energy Secretary’s net zero plans.
The Prime Minister has effectively closed the door on the construction of a major hydrogen project on Teesside – believed to be backed by Mr Miliband – by deciding to endorse a rival tech development near the site, according to correspondence seen by The Telegraph.
The H2Teesside plan, proposed by BP, would have produced so-called “blue” hydrogen that could have provided up to 10pc of the supply Mr Miliband has said Britain would need by 2030.
However, the plan clashes with proposals on nearby land for Europe’s largest data centre – backed by Teesworks, the public-private partnership supported by Tees Valley mayor Lord Houchen.
A letter to Lord Houchen from Peter Kyle, the Business Secretary, confirms that the Government is planning to designate the Teesworks site as an “AI growth zone”, a central plank of the Prime Minister’s plan to make Britain an artificial intelligence hub.
It describes the Teesworks data centre as “the cornerstone of the UK’s AI strategy” and states that Sir Keir’s AI adviser will join a group dedicated to the project.
The decision to designate the site an AI growth zone was made by the AI task force, chaired by Number 10.
“The Government will put its full weight behind Teesworks and Teesside International Airport becoming an AI growth zone,” the letter says, adding that ministers will push major AI companies to invest in the project.
The letter is due to be published by the Planning Inspectorate on Friday as part of a review of the hydrogen project. Last month Mr Miliband delayed a decision on it until the end of October “to allow time to request further information”.
The data centre and hydrogen plant projects are on overlapping plots of land and planning documents have stated that they are incompatible.
The Cabinet row over the decision has been seen as a test of Labour’s commitment to its net zero plans, which threaten to clash with the Prime Minister’s hopes of being a world leader in AI and attracting overseas investment.
Mr Miliband has the power to grant the hydrogen project a development consent order – a right to forcibly buy land off local property owners.
The Telegraph revealed last month that the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology had drafted in legal advice in the event that Mr Miliband granted the order. The Energy Secretary instead delayed the decision, keeping both projects in limbo.
BP has said it remained committed to the project and that it remained in talks with the Government.
It has admitted that it does not have a primary customer lined up for the hydrogen plant but has said the project should not be blocked by “speculative development”.
Sir Keir is keen to show he is committed to Britain’s AI goals, which are expected to be at the centre of a “technology partnership” agreed with Donald Trump, the US president, next week.
The Teesworks site has the potential for a data centre with more than a gigawatt of computing power, which would make it Britain’s largest site and potentially turbocharge hopes of developing and running advanced AI systems in Britain.
Mr Kyle’s letter, sent earlier this year before his recent replacement as Technology Secretary by Liz Kendall, stated that the Teesside AI growth zone would deliver “the sovereign AI capability that will secure the UK’s place as a global leader in this technology”.
A government spokesman said: “Any infrastructure decision this Government makes will be in the national interest – helping deliver the Government’s Plan for Change.”
Lord Houchen has said that Britain “cannot afford to dither and delay” if it is to compete in the global AI race.
In a letter to Mr Miliband in August, he said the hydrogen plant would have a “sterilising effect” on the AI growth zone plans.
Lord Houchen wrote to Michael Shanks, the energy minister, last week to say that H2Teesside remained in discussions with the Government and that no decision had been taken.
Most hydrogen it produced by steam reforming of Methane. For fuel cells, the hydrogen must be extremly pure and CO2 leftovers from the reforming must be removed.Today in hydrogen
The scientists completed an additional set of experiments and found that the membrane achieved a record-breaking selectivity of 1,800, meaning it allows hydrogen to pass through 1,800 times more easily than CO2.
Worded oddly--there is no hydrogen in CO2
Alcalic eletrolysers are very cheap, it takes just sone moderate priced nickel plates and and some KaNaOH solved in water. It only becomes expensive by the price of electricity and transport. Additionally, if a ultra high purity is needed (fuel cells) it also effects the price.Forget about green hydrogen (and also about methanol synthesised from any hydrogen). It's way too expensive.
The costs are much more prohibitive than was estimated years ago. Science failed. Engineers and natural scientists tried to calculate costs, but they were utterly incompetent at it. They calculated it would be 2-3x as expensive as steam-reformed hydrogen, in reality it's about 5x and no economies of scale to be found so far for electrolysers.
Clean/Green hydrogen is going to be something in China and in petrochemical industries in the EU (due to RED III directive) because that's where government power is wielded in a brutal fashion to overrule the market's price signal.
So, how do you deduce that ACES is a bad idea from this, when it is just a Centaur with H2-O2 thrusters and an IC engine for electrical power and pressurization. Centaur has more than 60 years of experience. Not to mention Saturn I,IB &V, Delta IV, Ariane family, and Shuttle. Are you saying these were all bad ideas to use hydrogen?So ACES was a bad idea then, after all?
I am consistent. I consistently state that there is no issues with seals on space vehicles in flight. Spaceflight has more stringent standards than terrestrial endeavors. Even with natural gas and propane, there are house, tank, vehicle, pipeline, etc leaks all the time. Now add leaky hydrogen with a flammability of 4-75% in air. It doesn't look like something John Q. Public can easily deal with.But I didn't jump down your throat wondering about seals
consistency please
I was going to say inaccurate generalization but it is just plain wrong.Fossil fuels do both…spread as a liquid with vapors rising from it.