Flanker family conformal pod

OM

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jun 22, 2008
Messages
752
Reaction score
32
Website
www.io.com
...So, did anyone else have a "Time Tunnel" flashback while looking at those photos? ;D
 

Deino

Moderator
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2006
Messages
3,041
Reaction score
1,322
Could it be the once proposed radar/AEW-modification for the carrier-version ? ??? ... it seems as the model has only a short sting.

Deino
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,305
Reaction score
1,886
well, carrier Flanker with no canards is something no-no
also, another detail - note flattened bottom of forward fuselage
 

Avimimus

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Dec 16, 2007
Messages
2,081
Reaction score
248
Are you certain that this conformal pod isn't a part of the wind tunnel mounting (ie. to control rotation as it is brought forward?)
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,305
Reaction score
1,886
are you kidding?
 

AeroFranz

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 4, 2008
Messages
2,394
Reaction score
429
I think such a big mounting would modify the aerodynamic characteristics enough that it would make the results difficult to interpret.
So no, I think that pod WAS what was being tested.
 

Deino

Moderator
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2006
Messages
3,041
Reaction score
1,322
flateric said:
well, carrier Flanker with no canards is something no-no
also, another detail - note flattened bottom of forward fuselage


Uppps ... how could I've missed that (I'm getting old these days !)

... and what's about a tactical recce version ??

Deino ???
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,305
Reaction score
1,886
dunno
meanwhile, you can list through almost all possible F-15 CFT usage variants, including Silent Eagle's conformal weapon carriage, and probably 90% of them will fit for podded Flanker (well, assisted take-off, probably no :) )

what was said, EW/ECM and electronic surveillance versions were in the list for pod

and, pod shown is surely not the only variant studied
 

sferrin

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
14,743
Reaction score
3,713
I'm surprised there weren't more ideas looked at doing that with the Tomcat. Just this one AFAIK.
 

Attachments

  • F-14IMI.jpg
    F-14IMI.jpg
    130.5 KB · Views: 186

Trident

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 8, 2006
Messages
1,290
Reaction score
793
I don't think the bottom of the front fuselage is actually flattened, most likely an optical illusion caused by motion blur.
 

Pyrrhic victory

This is going to hurt
Joined
Jan 31, 2008
Messages
73
Reaction score
31
I'm guessing folding the forward landing gear into the CFT would be a bit of a pain in the ass.

sferrin said:
I'm surprised there weren't more ideas looked at doing that with the Tomcat. Just this one AFAIK.

Probably carrier bring back issues. The F-16's CFT pair is 900 pounds and they don't have to carry anything. The F-14's would have to be structurally reinforced to carry Phoenixes and Sparrows in addition to being much larger. A shame because a CFT probably would have helped out a lot in the FAD missions. If the F-14 had received more land based export orders it might have popped up again as well.
 

Spring

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Jun 4, 2008
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
The F-14 doesn't have a lot of room between it engines ducts, so i'm really not surprised

The only decent room is at the aft of the aircraft, which is not an ideal place to fit such device
 

Similar threads

Top