• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Douglas A-4T for FN

hesham

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
24,708
Reaction score
1,454
Hi,

The Douglas A-4T was a project for French navy (FN) to
replace the Dassault Etendard,but dropped in favour of
Super Etendard,did you hear about it ?.
 

Jemiba

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
8,055
Reaction score
322
There was even a A-4 on the french carrier Foch in 1972, even with
(very small) french roundels !
After the failure of the Jaguar M the Aeronavale was looking for a
substitute, the Douglas A-4 or the Vought A-7 were considered,
in the end it was a "buy french" decision with the Super Etendard.

More infos here :
http://www.ffaa.net/projects/skyhawk/skyhawk.htm
 

hesham

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
24,708
Reaction score
1,454
Hi,


is there any drawing survivor for it ?.
 

VictorXL188

Former Aviation journalist/writer
Joined
Jul 31, 2013
Messages
88
Reaction score
15
When discovering this project a couple of years ago, I did do a quick mock up of what it might look like
 

Attachments

hesham

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
24,708
Reaction score
1,454
Great find,thank you Victor.
 

Archibald

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
2,745
Reaction score
316
It was one of the contenders for replacement of the antiquated Etendard IVs by 1982.

Competitors were

- Jaguar M (a miserable failure)

- Mirage F-1M (too much of an interceptor, overlapping with the Crusaders that did not needed replacement at the time)

- A-4T Skyhawk (considered obsolete)

- A-7 Corsair II
The best of the lot, what the French Navy really wanted, plus their links with Vought since 1939 and the V-156F, then the F-4U, and finally the Crusaders in 1964.
The A-7s would have been build under licence by Aerospatiale, a public wedge into Dassault private domination of French combat aircrafts since the 50's. The French government disagred, however, and Aerospatiale was told to concentrate on civilian jetliners.
The A-7 was all-weather hence expensive and a little too heavy for Foch and Clemenceau.

- An upgraded, low cost (supposedly) Etendard IV - the Super Etendard that ultimately won the day.

A very good website in both French and English
http://www.ffaa.net/projects/skyhawk/skyhawk.htm
 

circle-5

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
May 31, 2009
Messages
1,161
Reaction score
59
The A-4T would have been an excellent match for the diminutive size of the Foch and Clémenceau carriers. Thankfully, a more nuanced policy has since been gaining traction, with renewed NATO cooperation. Who could have ever imagined Hawkeye platforms on a French carrier back in those days? Sacrebleu!
 

hesham

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
24,708
Reaction score
1,454
Many thanks to you my dear Archibald.
 

dan_inbox

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2006
Messages
634
Reaction score
123
circle-5 said:
the Gaullist "independent" attitude that began with leaving NATO and unceremoniously booting U.S. forces out of the country in 1966 (after obtaining all their nuclear secrets).
Can you substantiate this assertion?
The usual story here is that CDG booted out NATO when the US denied him the computers needed to acquire the A-bomb. Which led to Plan Calcul and various more-or-less successful projects before France got "la Bombinette".
 

Jemiba

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
8,055
Reaction score
322
The story and details of the French withdrawal from NATO aren't part of this topic here.
Please stay on-topic and avoid political discussions.
 

kaiserd

I really should change my personal text
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2013
Messages
799
Reaction score
133
circle-5 said:
It would have been surprising if the French had purchased anything but a French-made airplane, regardless of development costs. The logic of standardizing weapons across European forces was not high on France's agenda at the time. This policy was in place since the Gaullist "independent" attitude that began with leaving NATO and unceremoniously booting U.S. forces out of the country in 1966 (after obtaining all their nuclear secrets).

The A-4T would have been an excellent match for the diminutive size of the Foch and Clémenceau carriers. Thankfully, a more nuanced policy has since been gaining traction, with renewed NATO cooperation. Who could have ever imagined Hawkeye platforms on a French carrier back in those days? Sacrebleu!
It is worth noting that the Crusader was bought in the early sixties (just before the period you mentioned).
Specifically re: the A-4T would it have carried a radar (1) at all, and (2) compatible with the Exocet missile (key capability of the Super Etendard)?
If not then (and given that it lacked the Corsair II's then sophisticated all weather capabilities) then the lack of enthusiasm for the A-4T becomes more understandable.
 

Kadija_Man

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
1,967
Reaction score
38
Was the Exocet even on the horizon in the mid 1960s?
 

dan_inbox

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2006
Messages
634
Reaction score
123
The Nord MM-38 development started in 1967. That's Mer-Mer, ie surface-surface, but there was also right away an air launched version, initially tested on helicopters.
Today's ASM version the AM-39 started in '74.
 

Tailspin Turtle

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
691
Reaction score
16
Website
www.tommythomason.com
The A-4T was a variant of the A-4M, which did not have a radar in favor of a nose-mounted angle rate bombing system. However, the A-4 from the C onward had a radar for terrain clearance and navigation in all-weather conditions. Douglas would have been happy to put in whatever radar system that the French desired and would fit.
 

Pioneer

Seek out and close with the enemy
Senior Member
Joined
May 22, 2006
Messages
1,676
Reaction score
46
Tailspin Turtle said:
The A-4T was a variant of the A-4M, which did not have a radar in favor of a nose-mounted angle rate bombing system. However, the A-4 from the C onward had a radar for terrain clearance and navigation in all-weather conditions. Douglas would have been happy to put in whatever radar system that the French desired and would fit.
Did anyone have Skyhawk's equipped with actual anti-ship missiles like the Exocet/Penguin/Harpoon???

Pioneer
 

Foo Fighter

I came, I saw, I drank some tea (and had a bun).
Joined
Jul 19, 2016
Messages
1,039
Reaction score
127
Off topic but, how CAN the politics of a weapon/system be removed from the weapon/system? Politics is just about the biggest influence on these projects.
 

Jemiba

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
8,055
Reaction score
322
Foo Fighter said:
CAN the politics of a weapon/system be removed from the weapon/system? ...
Of course not ! Every military procurement is a political decision, including cancellations of the development
of contenders, ordering local built or foreign systems and so on....
But here, we have to limit the scope of our discussions to the technical side only, because
- discussing the political side isn't the ground of being for this forum
- political discussions too often end in ranting, quarrels and personal insults and attacks.

There are lots of political fora on the internet, which can deal with such political aspects, but probably discussions
like "which type of radar would have given the A-4 a sufficient all-weather capability ?" aren't really encouraged there !

;)
 

Kadija_Man

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
1,967
Reaction score
38
Pioneer said:
Tailspin Turtle said:
The A-4T was a variant of the A-4M, which did not have a radar in favor of a nose-mounted angle rate bombing system. However, the A-4 from the C onward had a radar for terrain clearance and navigation in all-weather conditions. Douglas would have been happy to put in whatever radar system that the French desired and would fit.
Did anyone have Skyhawk's equipped with actual anti-ship missiles like the Exocet/Penguin/Harpoon???

M.A.D




Three pictures of a Harpoon "training round" under a US Navy A-4 Skyhawk, found here

So, it is obvious that the A-4 could carry a Harpoon. However, acquiring a target and firing it is another matter. I don't doubt the story behind that A-4 carrying a Harpoon practice round is interesting but is it relevant?
 

GTX

All hail the God of Frustration!!!
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2006
Messages
2,707
Reaction score
64
Website
beyondthesprues.com
There is this image of an Israeli A-4 with (I believe) Gabriel ASMs:

 

kaiserd

I really should change my personal text
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2013
Messages
799
Reaction score
133
Facinating pictures lads.
Did the French navy requirements that lead to the selection of the Super Etendard include the carriage of the Exocet (and the need for a radar for its use) or was the idea of mounting the Exocet more evolutionary in nature?
Did the French Navy specifically consider an amended A-4 configured with a radar and Exocet capability as a direct alternative to the Super Etendard?
The preceding comments suggest that the A-4T was radar-less.
 

Tailspin Turtle

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
691
Reaction score
16
Website
www.tommythomason.com
kaiserd said:
Facinating pictures lads.
Did the French navy requirements that lead to the selection of the Super Etendard include the carriage of the Exocet (and the need for a radar for its use) or was the idea of mounting the Exocet more evolutionary in nature?
Did the French Navy specifically consider an amended A-4 configured with a radar and Exocet capability as a direct alternative to the Super Etendard?
The preceding comments suggest that the A-4T was radar-less.
I haven't seen any documentation of the proposed/recommended/desired A-4T avionics but since the forthcoming air-launched Exocet was almost certainly a requirement and the A-4M was only radar-less because it was optimized for close-air support by the Marines, I'm sure that Douglas would have proposed qualifying a suitable (and French) radar for the A-4T. The A-4M was flown by the French pilots in the US to evaluate the type and flown by Navy pilots during carrier-suitability demonstrations on Foch, neither of which required a radar. In any event, the selection process appears to have been protracted and it may be that consideration of a license-built A-7 superseded that of the A-4T proposition and turned out to be the stalking horse for the Super Etendard.
 

Pioneer

Seek out and close with the enemy
Senior Member
Joined
May 22, 2006
Messages
1,676
Reaction score
46
Kadija_Man said:
Pioneer said:
Tailspin Turtle said:
The A-4T was a variant of the A-4M, which did not have a radar in favor of a nose-mounted angle rate bombing system. However, the A-4 from the C onward had a radar for terrain clearance and navigation in all-weather conditions. Douglas would have been happy to put in whatever radar system that the French desired and would fit.
Did anyone have Skyhawk's equipped with actual anti-ship missiles like the Exocet/Penguin/Harpoon???

Pioneer

Three pictures of a Harpoon "training round" under a US Navy A-4 Skyhawk, found here

So, it is obvious that the A-4 could carry a Harpoon. However, acquiring a target and firing it is another matter. I don't doubt the story behind that A-4 carrying a Harpoon practice round is interesting but is it relevant?
Target illumination/painting by 3rd party/source Kadija_Man ?
Just a thought :p


Pioneer
 

Archibald

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
2,745
Reaction score
316
circle-5 said:
The A-4T would have been an excellent match for the diminutive size of the Foch and Clémenceau carriers. Thankfully, a more nuanced policy has since been gaining traction, with renewed NATO cooperation. Who could have ever imagined Hawkeye platforms on a French carrier back in those days? Sacrebleu!
France got his nuclear bomb by itself, and not by stealing any secret. Also, thanks to Dan Inbox for his balanced answer (which mine is not, obviously)
 

Archibald

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
2,745
Reaction score
316
By the way, be confident the Aeronavale wouldn't have bought the Skyhawk if he had not been able to carry the Exocet. Even the SEM could carry one, under its wing, balanced by a fuel tank under the other wing. I'm quite sure the amazing A-4 could have handled an exocet on the centerline.
 
Top