IKPJH;PHLO
ACCESS: Restricted
- Joined
- 12 November 2022
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 4


Boeing's New Home For Historical Archives
Airlineratings.com has been given an exclusive first look at Boeing's magnificent new home for its Historical Archives.

Looks like the 1978 Boeing 777-100 Trijet, a concept that preceded ETOPS. LRA likely is for Long Range Aircraft, which is what the 777-100 was designed for as a transoceanic aircraft.
Well, not exactly, the first picture by IKPJH;PHLO looks more like a T-tail, because I don't see the lower horizontal stabilizer configuration. Possible this version below of the 777-100. However, I'm not convinced that this is the same aircraft. The inlet on the center engine looks shorter on the LRA aircraft.Better answer than mine. Thanks.
Well, not exactly, the first picture by IKPJH;PHLO looks more like a T-tail, because I don't see the lower horizontal stabilizer configuration. Possible this version below of the 777-100. However, I'm not convinced that this is the same aircraft. The inlet on the center engine looks shorter on the LRA aircraft.
View attachment 758195
From another perspective, the Boeing LRA does not have a T-tailWell, not exactly, the first picture by IKPJH;PHLO looks more like a T-tail, because I don't see the lower horizontal stabilizer configuration. Possible this version below of the 777-100. However, I'm not convinced that this is the same aircraft. The inlet on the center engine looks shorter on the LRA aircraft.
View attachment 758195
My first thought was Large Regional Aircraft, NMA probably isn't the only time Boeing's considered a regional twin aisle.LRA likely is for Long Range Aircraft
I think the Boeing LRA looks like this,Definitely agree on the T-tail. The underwing engines also look really far outboard compared to the 777-100 trijet iterations we have already posted. It's definitely a weird one.
Hmmmmm... I wonder what the 747-type aircraft on the top right of that image might be, it has to be some kind of proposal, and is quite massive, seemingly bigger than almost any other 747-type concept I've seen before, so perhaps you could try to make a design for that in the future like you just did the Boeing LRA earlier this week.From another perspective, the Boeing LRA does not have a T-tail
Hmmmmm... I wonder what the 747-type aircraft on the top right of that image might be, it has to be some kind of proposal, and is quite massive, seemingly bigger than almost any other 747-type concept I've seen before, so perhaps you could try to make a design for that in the future like you just did the Boeing LRA earlier this week.![]()
Very close, but if you look very, VERY closely at the top right of that image I quoted on earlier, that plane seemed to have just a hump deck, and not to mention that its entire designation seems to use Boeing's signature font, whereas the one you just linked to me has the "DOUBLE DECKER" part in a more casual font.
Very close, but if you look very, VERY closely at the top right of that image I quoted on earlier, that plane seemed to have just a hump deck, and not to mention that its entire designation seems to use Boeing's signature font, whereas the one you just linked to me has the "DOUBLE DECKER" part in a more casual font.