Convair Model 6

Triton

Donald McKelvy
Senior Member
Joined
14 August 2009
Messages
9,707
Reaction score
2,021
Website
deeptowild.blogspot.com
Convair Model 6

Seen here was the next logical step for Convair, marrying the swept-back wings of the YB-60 and the fuselage of the XC-99. The Model 6, however, retained the rounded cockpit of the B-36 rather than the airliner-style windows of the XC-99 (Model 37). The YB-60 was Convair's proposal for a large long-range heavy bomber; this was based on the B-36. Only two YB-60s were built; the USAF opted for Boeing's Model 464 (better known as the B-52) instead. This rare illustration comes from Dennis Jenkins et al., B-36 Photo Scrapbook, (Hinckley, Leics.: Specialty Press, 2003), p. 85. This is the companion book to Magnesium Overcast, by the same authors.
http://rides.webshots.com/photo/2931511060048918155qsFJEH
 

Attachments

  • ConvairModel6.jpg
    ConvairModel6.jpg
    221.7 KB · Views: 1,179
Here's some more.
 

Attachments

  • yb60onGround.jpg
    yb60onGround.jpg
    298.9 KB · Views: 958
  • YB-60 first flight.jpg
    YB-60 first flight.jpg
    149.3 KB · Views: 864
  • YB-60 takeoff.jpg
    YB-60 takeoff.jpg
    161 KB · Views: 820
  • YB-60.jpg
    YB-60.jpg
    399.9 KB · Views: 816
Does anyone here have evidence to support the fact that the YB-60 (or the X-6 for that matter) fell under the "Model 6" designation? The only document I know that is specifically labeled as such is the breakdown view (seen a few posts above) for a double-decker transport derived from the XC-99.
 
A larger view.

http://www.tailsthroughtime.com/2010/06/people-sometimes-ask-me-how-i-decide.html
 

Attachments

  • Convair6.jpg
    Convair6.jpg
    111.2 KB · Views: 198
Even with 8 engines, this aircraft would appear to be significantly under-powered. I think the B-52 would look petitie next to the Convair 6. The XC-99 used to reside at Kelly AFB, and looked vast even from a distance...at least to my eye.
 
Some NARA II images of the YB-60, including cockpit and flight engineers station.
 

Attachments

  • x-342FH-B26608-YB-60--49-2676-Right-Front-x.jpg
    x-342FH-B26608-YB-60--49-2676-Right-Front-x.jpg
    162.3 KB · Views: 212
  • x-342FH-B26607-YB-60--49-2676-Overhead.jpg
    x-342FH-B26607-YB-60--49-2676-Overhead.jpg
    153.3 KB · Views: 163
  • x-342FH-B26619-YB-60--49-2676-Flight-Engineers-Station-x.jpg
    x-342FH-B26619-YB-60--49-2676-Flight-Engineers-Station-x.jpg
    236.3 KB · Views: 158
  • x-342FH-B26620-YB-60--49-2676-Cockpit-x.jpg
    x-342FH-B26620-YB-60--49-2676-Cockpit-x.jpg
    220.4 KB · Views: 159
A few more in-flight images of the YB-60 from NARA II.
 

Attachments

  • x-342FH-B26615-YB-60--49-2676-Inflight-x.jpg
    x-342FH-B26615-YB-60--49-2676-Inflight-x.jpg
    143.6 KB · Views: 173
  • x-342FH-B26616-YB-60--49-2676-Inflight-x.jpg
    x-342FH-B26616-YB-60--49-2676-Inflight-x.jpg
    76.3 KB · Views: 180
  • x-342FH-B26617-YB-60--49-2676-Inflight-x.jpg
    x-342FH-B26617-YB-60--49-2676-Inflight-x.jpg
    108.8 KB · Views: 191
Thanks Bill, nice photos! I wonder why the undercarriage is censored on photo no. B26608. Didn't Convair just carry these components over from the B-36?
 
circle-5 said:
Thanks Bill, nice photos! I wonder why the undercarriage is censored on photo no. B26608. Didn't Convair just carry these components over from the B-36?

An unwarranted guess: if the photo showed the known B-36 landing gear with the known B-36 tires being squashed more or less than normal, an analyst could make a guess about the weight of the aircraft. Probably not it, though.
 
This the No-2 Yb-60.
 

Attachments

  • YB-60 number-2 in an Airplane Hanger.j.jpg
    YB-60 number-2 in an Airplane Hanger.j.jpg
    325 KB · Views: 258
That is not related to Model 6 or YB-60 but part of the FSW studies Convair was doing post war. I thought there was a thread with that aircraft posted in it already but I cant find it.

https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,5164.msg84404.html
 
Orionblamblam said:
circle-5 said:
Thanks Bill, nice photos! I wonder why the undercarriage is censored on photo no. B26608. Didn't Convair just carry these components over from the B-36?

An unwarranted guess: if the photo showed the known B-36 landing gear with the known B-36 tires being squashed more or less than normal, an analyst could make a guess about the weight of the aircraft. Probably not it, though.

Early photos of the B-52 sometimes had the landing gear obscured because of the swivel feature that accommodated cross-wind landings, which was important because it allowed operations from portions of the interstate highway system, maybe the censorship is related to that. I don't know of any similar feature on the B-60, but maybe it existed and has been forgotten, or was planned, or perhaps its absence was deemed sensitive.
 
This is my personal interpretation of the Model 6 or (better) the C-99J:

View attachment 673675
This is incredible & beautiful, Archipeppe. The XC-99 is one of my favourite aircraft, and any top quality 3 view illustrations thereof (or variants or proposals thereon) really delights me. This one is completely unfamiliar to me - is this a real proposal or strictly of your own imagination?
 
This is my personal interpretation of the Model 6 or (better) the C-99J:

View attachment 673675
This is incredible & beautiful, Archipeppe. The XC-99 is one of my favourite aircraft, and any top quality 3 view illustrations thereof (or variants or proposals thereon) really delights me. This one is completely unfamiliar to me - is this a real proposal or strictly of your own imagination?
Thank you so much Foiling.

The design isn't my own fantasy rather a real proposal. If you read this topic by its start will find more reference about it.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom