• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Chinese Cyberwarfare capabilities - Enter the cyber dragon....

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
8,980
Reaction score
178



 

sferrin

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
11,811
Reaction score
217
The rare earths thing could motivate the US to get back in production. Being in a position of potentially being held hostage by another country is idiotic.
 

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
8,980
Reaction score
178

TomS

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
3,178
Reaction score
102

sferrin

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
11,811
Reaction score
217
Forgot to put this in:
LOL! I wasn't aware the US Constitution applied to other countries.
It applies to non-US persons present in the US. It's not a huge stretch to suggest that it applies to non-US companies doing business in the US.
If they think we're going to be forced into letting them run wild by our own Constitution I have a bridge for sale. As silly as thinking Sukhoi could try the same tactic to sell us fighter jets.
 

TomS

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
3,178
Reaction score
102
It's just a matter of how the law was written (which is to say, badly). Identifying certain behaviors or characteristics that would make a company subject to a ban, and then having the DoJ or DoD list Huawei as a company that exhibits those behaviors, would obvious be constitutional. Banning a company by name in legislation may well not be, in the same way that we can't pass a law that says a specific person must pay extra taxes or be sent to jail or whatever. It's a matter of adhering to basic principles of equity and due process.
 

sferrin

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
11,811
Reaction score
217
It's just a matter of how the law was written (which is to say, badly). Identifying certain behaviors or characteristics that would make a company subject to a ban, and then having the DoJ or DoD list Huawei as a company that exhibits those behaviors, would obvious be constitutional. Banning a company by name in legislation may well not be, in the same way that we can't pass a law that says a specific person must pay extra taxes or be sent to jail or whatever. It's a matter of adhering to basic principles of equity and due process.
Yeah that makes sense. Just sounded like another case of someone screaming, "that's unconstitutional!" just because it's something they don't like.
 

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
8,980
Reaction score
178
I'm not sure though that they can use that argument, since they are a de facto agent of a foreign power, among other things. They may end up digging an even deeper hole for themselves, not to mention whatever supporters they have left in the United States.
 

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
8,980
Reaction score
178
 

Arjen

It's turtles all the way down
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2010
Messages
2,292
Reaction score
55
U-turn on Huawei sanctions. Not needed anymore. Apparently.
 

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
8,980
Reaction score
178
Something tells me that is going to backfire. Badly.
 

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
8,980
Reaction score
178
 

Arjen

It's turtles all the way down
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2010
Messages
2,292
Reaction score
55
U-turn on Huawei sanctions. Needed again after all. Apparently.
 

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
8,980
Reaction score
178

DWG

CLEARANCE: Secret
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
295
Reaction score
36
Worth pointing out that US immigration does precisely the same thing. Both US and Chinese immigration can demand you unlock your phone then take it into a back room to strip your social media usage bare. The only difference here is the Chinese are sometimes forgetting to delete the search app they use afterwards (or are doing it deliberately to spread FUD). And seeing as it installs itself with an icon and you know who put it there, it doesn't really fit classic definitions of malware.

ETA: And for that matter there's all the Western allies such as Saudi targeting dissidents and Western media with NSO Pegasus.
 

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
8,980
Reaction score
178
While U.S. Customs and Border Protection can inspect and if necessary impound computers, hard drives, etc., they can't routinely install tracking apps or malware on them.
 

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
8,980
Reaction score
178

 

overscan

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
11,374
Reaction score
609
Can someone explain the purpose of this topic? "Bad things China is alleged to have done?"?
 

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
8,980
Reaction score
178
Well, it is primarily about their cyberwarfare capabilities and activities.
 

edwest

CLEARANCE: Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2007
Messages
427
Reaction score
33
The West is silent about this because the public has no need to know. None. Whatever the public knows, or is told, China will know. The technology behind this is unknown and will remain secret for the good of national security. And to avoid helping the enemy. When the enemy is in the dark, he will not know which way to turn. This is standard tactics in this sort of warfare.
 
Top