Tomboy
ACCESS: Top Secret
- Joined
- 4 January 2025
- Messages
- 543
- Reaction score
- 1,967
That R in RQ-170 stands for recon...This definitely hasn't been in service for almost 20 years...![]()
That R in RQ-170 stands for recon...This definitely hasn't been in service for almost 20 years...![]()
This definitely hasn't been in service for almost 20 years...![]()
I don't think there's any doubt that, had the US wanted to, they could have been far ahead of where they are. We've already landed and launched large UCAV analogs from a carrier, and they've performed in-air refueling. Why we didn't do it is anybody's guess. Maybe it was another case of, "it will take China 20 years to build a stealth fighter" hubrus. It wasn't technical.That's the point ... even if we've seen indeed "such formation flights have already been displayed by the US, Russia and France a good while ago" all have been made by prototypes and/or demonstrators only and none - at least by my understanding - has reached operational status in relevant numbers.
I don't think there's any doubt that, had the US wanted to, they could have been far ahead of where they are. We've already landed and launched large UCAV analogs from a carrier, and they've performed in-air refueling. Why we didn't do it is anybody's guess. Maybe it was another case of, "it will take China 20 years to build a stealth fighter" hubrus. It wasn't technical.
Yeah, that's just stupid. While it may have helped them get where they are faster the fact is they are GETTING there. Even if they were, say, five years behind, they are iterating faster. They have a far larger workforce, and it has more experience due to the rapid iteration and higher production rates. Even if, "China is lagging far behind, currently just copying US concepts, etc..." you have to take it seriously if only because of the volume of hardware they're turning out.That's for sure and I never said, it was "technical"! Indeed - maybe like Germany which reduced itself in the last decades almost to irrelevance - the reasons were more political or a lack of whatever in decision making.
Quite interesting however a few weeks ago, I was invited to speak at a drone trade fair/symposium in Vienna about Chinese drone systems and development trends. The LM team was also there to present their concepts for MUM-T / Loyal Wingman systems – especially Vectis. Of course, the familiar accusation quickly resurfaced that China is lagging far behind, currently just copying US concepts, etc. ...
That's the F119/F135 equivalent, right?According to credible sources on Weibo, the WS-15 engine has entered mass production and delivery.
Yep, the problem has been mass production at the same scale as the WS-10 family, which all Chinese fighters, minus the J-35(A) depend upon.That's the F119/F135 equivalent, right?
Depends on the version. Its latest iteration is kind of like the Izdeliye 117S in the sense that it is a 4th-gen engine brought up to 5th-gen requirements. The WS-10C (and C2) is enough to enable the vanilla J-20 to supercruise for example.WS10 is the F110 equivalent?
That's why I was using "equivalent"I keep calling it a copy so that people can understand the similarities better, but when developing the WS-10, they built upon what they learned from the WS-6 program and used the CFM56 as a rough reference for the hot section.
F119 equivalent in terms of philosophy.That's the F119/F135 equivalent, right?
WS10 is the F110 equivalent?
finallyAnd indeed a major Christmas news if true ... allegedly the first production J-20A powered by serial WS-15 engines has made its maiden flight today!
View attachment 796566
After all the years of maybe-possibly-allegedly-perhaps, I'll wait for more concrete informationAnd indeed a major Christmas news if true ... allegedly the first production J-20A powered by serial WS-15 engines has made its maiden flight today!
All the evidence (as well as the credible rumor/insight mill) so far suggests that serial production hurdles have indeed been overcome, and induction in Q1/Q2 2026 should be expected. Btw, this was photographed on the same day:After all the years of maybe-possibly-allegedly-perhaps, I'll wait for more concrete information
If it's high quality, it's from 9.3 which are ones with WS-10C2
Looks kinda fake, doesn’t it? I also wanted to share the collage, but first wanted to make sure it isn’t fake…View attachment 798319
Very interesting, isn't it? Based on the paint scheme and shape, this should be an early prototype.
Its a segment from a video posted by Chengdu AC on weibo, I thought it was real, but the close up looks like a 3d model - the bit immediately after it shows a launch from further away which looks to be genuine but there isn't much to see there.Looks kinda fake, doesn’t it? I also wanted to share the collage, but first wanted to make sure it isn’t fake…
These angles are poor so you can't get a good view anyways. Likely intentional.Pedal length is much longer on supposed WS-15 versions.
Only the primer one here has WS-15sFactory Fresh J-20A/S coming out of CAC with very likely WS-15 equipped..
Yes one may argue that we can see a visible ring, but Chinese commentators have stated that the petals are visibly longer and defined, like the WS-15 than like the previous WS-10C variants.
View attachment 799537
View attachment 799538
View attachment 799539
View attachment 799540
View attachment 799541
Sorry to one-up but here's a 4K version:Higher definition images. From AVIC Weibo.
View attachment 799550