US Navy’s UCLASS / CBARS / MQ-XX / MQ-25 Stingray Program

[NMaude]

More terrorists getting blown up.

So snuff-films it is.

 

[wtna7]

Regarding the U.S. Navy's MQ-25 program:
Contracts for 76 MQ-25 aircraft have been signed. Deliveries for "Lot 1"—totaling three aircraft—are expected to begin in 2029, with two additional aircraft entering service in Fiscal Year 2028.
——
Regarding Squadrons VUQ-11 and VUQ-12: Each detachment is planned to be equipped with five MQ-25 aircraft.

VUQ-11 Detachment 5 is assigned to a forward-deployed naval unit. VUQ-10 is a training squadron and is not counted among the operational detachments.

 

[galgot]

Had the opportunity to talk to someone working on this program, a true Gentleman.
Could ask him stupid questions, cause I know nothin' . This is basically a resume, what I remember :
Me - "Why that air intake style, I thought Naca air intakes were considered quite ineffective for feeding an engine ?"
Him - "Well the guys who designed that one found out it works quite well for what the plane has to do. Plus we can be sure no one is going to walk in front of it, that's a big plus on a carrier."
Me - "If this is going to be mainly a refueller, why the external pod for carrying the hose/drogue system ? Why not integrating the thing in the airframe ?"
Him - "Cause lot of the airframe volume is already filled with fuel, and integrating the refuelling system would have taken too much place, diminishing the capacity a lot. Basically, all the yellow panels you see on the plane are covering fuel tanks."
Me - "So it's basically a flying service station ?"
Him - "That's exactly what it is ."

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oWVGd9nfCw

 

[Josh_TN]

With regards to the external drogue - IIRC that was a USN program stipulation, to reduce risk. I thought the reasoning was more “we already have a piece of equipment for this that works” more than volume constraints, but I was not working on the project so I will assume he knows what he’s talking about.

 

[JS23]

(It also means that when you inevitably repurpose the "refueling drone" you did receive funding for into the multi-mission platform you didn't, you don't have to keep lugging that refueling equipment everywhere.)

 

[galgot]

(It also means that when you inevitably repurpose the "refueling drone" you did receive funding for into the multi-mission platform you didn't, you don't have to keep lugging that refueling equipment everywhere.)

Lol, actually before I talked to the Gentleman from Boeing, I was watching the vid I posted with a friend and saying "mmmh... with that refuelling system hanged under the wing on an obviously kinda stealthy airframe, I don't think this thing is going to be used only as a refueller..."

 

[EmoBirb]

It's almost as if it was envisioned from the start to be multirole (MQ, multirole-unmanned) and also emphasize persistent ISR as a secondary mission profile to aerial refueling as it's priority...

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-114hhrg99630/pdf/CHRG-114hhrg99630.pdf

CBARS (MQ–25A) is a restructure of the UCLASS program. The MQ–25A program is envisioned to be an integral part of the future Carrier Air Wing, providing organic refueling and a tactical sea-based long-endurance Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance capability

https://www.congress.gov/114/meeting/house/104961/documents/CRPT-114hrpt537.pdf

The committee is encouraged that the Department of Defense has completed its review of the Unmanned Carrier Launched Surveillance and Strike (UCLASS) program and has decided to move forward with a slight variation that will include airborne tanking as an additional requirement. While this new capability was not identified as a requirement in the UCLASS Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) or the draft Capabilities Development Document (CDD) that had been previously validated by the Chief of Naval Operations, the committee recognizes the need for the enhanced capability and the positive impact it could have on the overall Carrier Air Wing (CVW). A requirement that was included in both the UCLASS ICD and CDD was the need for persistent, carrier-based intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance (ISR) and precision-strike. Furthermore, as stated in the Carrier Based Aerial Refueling System (CBARS) budget documents, "The CBARS requirements are aligned with the UCLASS which highlights the need for a persistent, carrier-based ISR, and precision strike asset.’’ The budget documents go on to note in the Air Segment Product Development description that the unmanned vehicle will be ‘‘capable of aerial refueling (give) and persistent Intelligence Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) operations with future precision strike.’’

 

[Ozair]

Lol, actually before I talked to the Gentleman from Boeing, I was watching the vid I posted with a friend and saying "mmmh... with that refuelling system hanged under the wing on an obviously kinda stealthy airframe, I don't think this thing is going to be used only as a refueller..."

Realistically though unless the USN drastically changes the program and increases the number of airframes MQ-25 will not be doing ISR. With 5 airframes planned for a carrier airwing you can expect four available at any one time. That gives you two refuelling a strike package, one around the carrier and one reserve.

The alternative is you still use SH for some refuelling sorties but that defeats the purpose of the MQ-25 and its primary role. There is also likely to be cheaper airframes available for ISR before sufficient MQ-25 are available given how long the program is taking to reach IOC, especially if the USN recent CCA RFI gets some reasonable responses.

 

[EmoBirb]

There is also likely to be cheaper airframes available for ISR before sufficient MQ-25 are available given how long the program is taking to reach IOC, especially if the USN recent CCA RFI gets some reasonable responses.

For the foreseeable future the MQ-25 will remain the only organic ISR asset endemic to the carrier air wing. Unless they're planning on throwing MQ-9B SeaGuardian off the deck anytime soon. Because I wouldn't bet on seeing any USN CCA flying within this decade.