collins355

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
23 September 2008
Messages
70
Reaction score
78
Lots of chatter over the last few days about a newly revealed Chinese R&D project that may be moving ahead for a semi-submersible high speed arsenal ship.
 

Attachments

  • semi submersible arsenal ship.jpg
    semi submersible arsenal ship.jpg
    18 KB · Views: 836
Jam or otherwise interrupt the link providing targeting information to this Chinese arsenal ship and it becomes worthless junk.
 
As a concept I don't think that makes any sense. Very interested in semi-subs but that type of mast-only semi-sub seems the worst of both worlds. Hull engineering is very little short of a true submersible, safety is only marginally better than a true submersible and things like weapons launch are greatly complicated. And low detectibility only marginally improved.
 
collins355 said:
Lots of chatter over the last few days about a newly revealed Chinese R&D project that may be moving ahead for a semi-submersible high speed arsenal ship.
Original paper as I understand is describing Chinese analog of (in)famous Columbia River SEALS semi-submerged stealth boats ('Alligators') while giant arsenal ships are nothing more than fanart developing an idea.
 

Attachments

  • DA5V1ggVwAABiAW.jpg
    DA5V1ggVwAABiAW.jpg
    41.1 KB · Views: 716
  • DA5V1e8UwAA_7Bi.jpg
    DA5V1e8UwAA_7Bi.jpg
    24.8 KB · Views: 698
Whooahh that's much more interesting. That's the sort of semi-sub that does make a lot of sense.


This likely ties with SCS island disputes. Basically an SF craft.
 
The I-SILC has conventional cylindrical dry compartments inside because the hull fully submerges. The illustration has flat sided wet-dry dividers like alligator (which does not fully submerge).

Has someone missed this?

Sorry to sound negative.
 
Carderock well knows an "awash" ie Sub/Surface Streetfighter-like FFG (X) is quite possible if there is intent & resource were made available.
 
Carderock well knows an "awash" ie Sub/Surface Streetfighter-like FFG (X) is quite possible if there is intent & resource were made available.
LOL.

Speed is limited to ~10 knots, maybe 14 or 15 top end while awash. 20knots, if you're willing to suffer 5knot submerged speeds.

Has all the disadvantages of a submarine's low speeds and limited internal access, limited firepower outlets, limited total firepower... I could keep going.
 
Not sure why one would copy an adversary rather than take one of many concept off the shelf of your own. Carderock concepts have been literally stacking up for decades.

Operating periods awash or even submerged, but primarily traveling as high speed catamaran, could appear as concept being contemplating for at least a half century.
 
Most likely it's merely a prototype for large-scale testing, not a production unit. One thing that makes Chinese very cool - they build & test a lot of prototypes. So even if project got cancelled eventually, they obtain a lot of precious data - which could then be used for other projects.
 
Most likely it's merely a prototype for large-scale testing, not a production unit. One thing that makes Chinese very cool - they build & test a lot of prototypes. So even if project got cancelled eventually, they obtain a lot of precious data - which could then be used for other projects.
We do alot of prototypes/demonstrators too. The thing that makes the Chinese cool is that they actually commit to production with uninterrupted long term planning and discipline to control requirement creeps, unlike us because there's always a study half way through reserach that find some obscure scenario that compromise the weapon system. You can't lose a weapon system if you don't have any to lose.
 
Some CGI of it.
 

Attachments

  • trimiran arsenal ship.jpg
    trimiran arsenal ship.jpg
    61.4 KB · Views: 156
  • trimiran arsenal ship1.jpg
    trimiran arsenal ship1.jpg
    50.8 KB · Views: 173
Some CGI of it.
If that is accurate, I doubt the submerged depth it can reach, based on the missile hatches and packing density looking more like those of a surface ship.

looks like 6x UAV hatches and 16x4= 64x missiles, plus 6x torpedo tubes.

I strongly doubt the torpedo tubes, there's just flat not enough space for a torpedo room. You need roughly 3x the length of the shutter doors for a torpedo room, 2x if those tubes are single-shot.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom