Ukrainian Cruise Missile Development and Deployment


 

Attachments

  • Neptune Family.jpg
    Neptune Family.jpg
    186.2 KB · Views: 528
Last edited by a moderator:

Attachments

  • markup_1000012811 (1).png
    markup_1000012811 (1).png
    942.5 KB · Views: 22

View attachment 787720
The lengths look all wrong there based on earlier photos of the D. It looked shorter than Long Neptune. Long Neptune was also wider diameter than it.
 
Very interesting. The well respected french aviation expert Xavier Tytelman thinks the same.

The amount of ruzzian copium in the comments is off-scale LMAO.
 
Last edited:
Take this with a grain of salt.
Very interesting. The well respected french aviation expert Xavier Tytelman thinks the same.

The amount of ruzzian copium in the comments is off-scale LMAO.
Great analysis, and this is before Firepoints other systems which I think are going to cause much much more issues than the FP-5.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ballistic missiles (FP-9, from memory). Firepoint is going all-out on many different strike systems, with a very real risk of getting overstreched.
FP-9 is a longer-range system capable of reaching targets up to 855 kilometers away, flying at 2,200 meters per second, and carrying an 800-kilogram warhead to altitudes of up to 70 kilometers.
 

Attachments

  • 1760638220170.png
    1760638220170.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 483
Last edited by a moderator:
In regards to the FP-5 Flamingo's warhead compartment perhaps a different design for it could be created so that it can hold either a modified FAB-1000 warhead, Mk-84 warhead or the BLU-109 warhead.
 
In regards to the FP-5 Flamingo's warhead compartment perhaps a different design for it could be created so that it can hold either a modified FAB-1000 warhead, Mk-84 warhead or the BLU-109 warhead.
I’ve been told that the fAB series actually skips 1000 and goes from 500 to 1500.
 
I’ve been told that the fAB series actually skips 1000 and goes from 500 to 1500.

I've looked around on the internet and there definitely is a FAB-1000. The reason I made my suggestion is that it would expand the available pool of warheads for the FP-5.
 
Sorry, I should have been more specific - there are/were FAB-1000s, but I think not of the relatively low drag M62 variety. The one picture I have seen of the bomb sticking out of the nose of an incomplete missile airframe seemed streamlined like it was M62, or possibly even mk84, though I do not know if the pic had been altered or if it was representative of all production missiles assuming it was a real. I would guess some Soviet vintage bomb is used off the shelf for cost and sovereignty issues, but I have only heard it described as “1 ton”.
 
Megaprojects put out this video about the FP-5 Flamingo a couple of days ago:


Ukraine's FP-5 Flamingo missile boasts a massive 1.15-ton warhead, built largely from repurposed materials. This long-range cruise missile, with a reported 3,000km range, utilizes a unique antenna system for jamming resistance. Despite its impressive firepower, the Flamingo's vulnerabilities are explored.​
 
This is great news, now if we can get updates on the 7 produced per day goal, last I heard they were missing some funding. Seems this FP-5 +long range neptune will be the core of their subsonic cruise missile arsenal. Also interesting that now production will focus on ballistic missile production possibly another FP style device

This is quite big news, US companies could possibly provide components if FirePoint gets US shareholders.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They might be already for all we know. It is not a weapon with a low signature; it might have issues penetrating defenses. We also do not know there are enough to use in mass. Ukr production numbers seem rather hard to believe, else there should be several dozen available almost every month..
 
I suspect that when Ukraine does start to use the FP-5 in large numbers those missiles would likely be preceded by drones to degrade and strip away any air-defence assets protecting the FP-5s target (The Yelabuga facility for example will very likely have its' own dedicated anti-aircraft systems such as the SA-15 Gauntlet, SA-21 Growler and SA-22 Greyhound SAMs).​
 
but Russian AD is non trivial.

True but I suspect that the Ukrainians would deal with that issue when a target such as, say, the Shahed drone-factory by sending in several waves of drones (Including the FP-1) to first degrade and strip away all of the SAM batteries in the way before sending in the FP-5s.

On another note I wonder if Ukraine is developing a submunition cluster warhead for the FP-5? That would be handy for attacking airfields or troop formations for example.​
 
Except it already hit targets in Crimea and elsewhere.

 
Claims by two propaganda outlets .do not mean any actually hit anything or were used at all , remember Flamingo was promoted as 3000km range missile what is the point in using them inside atacms range.
You could say it confirms what Petro said , it exists ,launches impressively , few are built ,can't hit shit and its mostly PR.It definitely does not refute what Petro former president of Koruptistan said.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
View: https://x.com/NOELreports/status/2003762613927239772?s=20
President Zelensky shared recent accuracy figures for Ukraine’s FP-5 Flamingo and (Long-)Neptune missiles. He said that in the latest use of five Flamingo missiles, one hit its target while four were shot down by Russian air defenses, but performance is improving “month by month,” he said to Ukrinform.Zelensky also noted that the Ruta missile, built with foreign partners, has been effective when used, but remains limited in number due to technical issues, especially with engines and funding.Regarding Neptune missiles, he reported that their hit rate has gone from “good” to “very good.”

Destinus RUTA


Ukraine’s New Ruta Missile Outsmarts GPS Jamming With Spanish Tech​

Speed - Mach 0.8, Range - 500km

Ukraine’s New “Bars” Missile Drone Can Hit Targets 500 Miles Inside Russia​

 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom