China 2025 Victory Day Parade (preparations, new equipment)

Only if the actual missile (not this mockup) shows some separation lines and evidence of a terminal stage rocket. In a way, those would mess with the stealthiness to some degree. So i'm not actually expecting it. Perhaps this C is less of a family member of A, and more of chinese analogue to LRASM, though modeled to fit the VLS cell - so it appears longer and slimmer than LRASM. (in reality it's probably not slimmer at all, just looks slim because its so much longer than LRASM)

Then again, we're looking at a ZL marked truck, which should suggest a Rocket force asset, not a naval asset. So maybe it's more of a general use cruise missile? Which shares characteristics with a possible naval service family member? Or maybe YJ18C is simply to be used by both services, with good enough capability against ground and moving sea targets?
 
Specific arrangements for military parades
www.gov.cn

各项准备基本完成 新型装备将集中亮相——国新办发布会公布九三阅兵活动具体安排__中国政府网

受阅部队将在长安街列阵，光荣接受中共中央总书记、国家主席、中央军委主席习近平的检阅；阅兵时长约70分钟，编设45个方（梯）队；受阅武器装备都是国产现役主战装备，是继2019年国庆大阅兵后我军新一代武器装备的集中亮相……国务院新闻办公室20日举行新闻发布会，介绍9月3日阅兵准备工作和具体安排，并回答记者提问。
www.gov.cn www.gov.cn
 
SUPER=BUG said:
Specific arrangements for military parades
www.gov.cn

各项准备基本完成 新型装备将集中亮相——国新办发布会公布九三阅兵活动具体安排__中国政府网

受阅部队将在长安街列阵，光荣接受中共中央总书记、国家主席、中央军委主席习近平的检阅；阅兵时长约70分钟，编设45个方（梯）队；受阅武器装备都是国产现役主战装备，是继2019年国庆大阅兵后我军新一代武器装备的集中亮相……国务院新闻办公室20日举行新闻发布会，介绍9月3日阅兵准备工作和具体安排，并回答记者提问。
www.gov.cn www.gov.cn
Click to expand...
Odd web address. Isn't the usual format country.gov optional .country?
 
Scott Kenny said:
Odd web address. Isn't the usual format country.gov optional .country?
Click to expand...
Nope.

Almost every country in the world has .gov.[country]

e.g. .gov.uk, .gov.nz, .gov.au, .gov.cn

US was supposed to use the country code .us (.us being the country code for the United States of America) but most businesses decided they wouldn't bother generally with a country code.

This kind of makes sense for multinational organisations using .com rather than .com.us and .com is not restricted, anyone can buy one.

In contrast .gov is restricted to US government agencies ONLY, which is super presumptuous that it can be global in scope but only available to the US.
 
Scott Kenny said:
Odd web address. Isn't the usual format country.gov optional .country?
Click to expand...
In fact, I think this is related to the origin of the Internet in the United States, which may be a bit off-topic here, but it will be an interesting topic.
 
martinbayer said:
Judging by the state of play on this here planet at the moment, unfortunately the World Anti-Fascist War seems to be an epic fail to me...
Click to expand...
It's a reference to WW2, right?

Calling WW2 "anti-Fascist" is fairly uncontroversial.

From China's perspective Japanese aggression was a large part of WW2 as well.

Seems pretty accurate?
 
Scott Kenny said:
I'm not arguing that all of those could/would be designed to fit into the big UVLS tubes.

But what mission would each one do? There's two different HGVs and a hypersonic cruise missile in play, plus a high-supersonic cruise missile.
Click to expand...

Seems far fetched to me that the YJ-19 is for surface launch. The cruiser looks like a slimmed down X-51 waverider and that booster would not be able to get it to speed or altitude for that. I would guess air launched HACM equivalent.
 
Last edited:
Josh_TN said:
Seems far fetched to me that the YJ-19 is for surface launch. The cruiser looks like a slimmed down X-51 waverider and that booster would not be able to get it to speed or altitude for that. I would guess air launched HACM equivalent.
Click to expand...
It ain't, it's submarine launched via torpedo tubes
 
Tomboy said:
It ain't, it's submarine launched via torpedo tubes
Click to expand...

We will agree to disagree; that seems unlikely to me for that one particular model for both reasons of size and shape but also the aerodynamics of the alleged air breathing engine.

If we see a ship or sub launch one, I owe you a coke.
 
Any military hardware tied up in any parade is a potential bonus to any potential adversary - just saying...
 
martinbayer said:
Any military hardware tied up in any parade is a potential bonus to any potential adversary - just saying...
Click to expand...
It really isn't. What you see on parade is a fraction of what's operational. And the ICBM TELs for example are most certainly not carrying their nukes around. I doubt China's war fighting capability hinges on a couple dozen tanks and jets and couple prototype drones and empty TELs.
 
EmoBirb said:
It really isn't. What you see on parade is a fraction of what's operational. And the ICBM TELs for example are most certainly not carrying their nukes around. I doubt China's war fighting capability hinges on a couple dozen tanks and jets and couple prototype drones and empty TELs.
Click to expand...
;)
 
EmoBirb said:
USVs and UUVs prowling the seas ceaselessly to deny a given area to enemy submarines completely...not bad, not bad at all.
Click to expand...
Unless someone manages to subvert or otherwise neutralise them with a distributed logic bomb or similar, that is.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom