“They’d say you had to have a 90% success rate, which is pretty good on the flashcards to qualify to sit in that gunner seat. But with the right training data and the right training, I mean, I can't imagine not being able to get a system, an algorithm, to be able to do better than 90% in terms of saying ‘this is the type of vehicle that you're looking at,’ and then allowing that human to make that decision on whether the machine is right or not, and to pull the trigger.”
That says a lot about the future role of human operators on the robotic battlefield and how human limitations will one day be a bigger factor than the limitations of AI.
https://www.armytimes.com/news/your...ilthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=army-dnr “We’re making up about 50% of our force off the 18X program for direct recruits off the street — and these are highly talented people...[like] journalists, stockbrokers, lawyers” and others with STEM degrees, Braga explained. “It’s been the lifeblood of our [recruiting] efforts.”
There’s also the potential that overproduction on such contracts could help fill the ranks elsewhere in the force, which is grappling with a historically-bad recruiting crisis. Direct entry programs for special operations allow recruits who don’t pass to be reassigned according to the Army’s needs — an oft-repeated joke holds that the 18X program is the 82nd Airborne Division’s top source of recruits.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.