Register here

Author Topic: Warren-Young Skycar tailless aircraft  (Read 4777 times)

Offline hesham

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 22793
Warren-Young Skycar tailless aircraft
« on: January 07, 2008, 04:17:30 am »
Hi,

Please see this Skycar,a beautiful tailless aircraft project which was
designed by Warren-Young.

http://www.flightglobal.com/PDFArchive/View/1950/1950%20-%201511.html?search=gulfstream%20ngt%20aircraft%201982
« Last Edit: January 26, 2014, 03:40:07 pm by hesham »

Offline Justo Miranda

  • Secret Projects Master
  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 3370
Re: Warren-Young Skycar tailless aircraft
« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2008, 12:39:02 pm »
I like the Rhomboids!
Please find attached a few more.

Offline hesham

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 22793
Re: Warren-Young Skycar tailless aircraft
« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2008, 09:30:26 am »
« Last Edit: January 12, 2019, 04:16:50 am by hesham »

Offline Justo Miranda

  • Secret Projects Master
  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 3370
Re: Warren-Young Skycar tailless aircraft
« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2008, 01:52:40 pm »
Rhomboids are very rare. I just have the three attached ones

Offline boxkite

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 796
Re: Warren-Young Skycar tailless aircraft
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2008, 11:06:31 pm »

Offline Justo Miranda

  • Secret Projects Master
  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 3370
Re: Warren-Young Skycar tailless aircraft
« Reply #5 on: January 09, 2008, 12:06:27 pm »
Thanks for the Boxkite references. I believe the Rhomboid wing shares its great aerodynamic inefficency with the Circular Wing. I used the keyword "diamond wing" when using the search option without any results. I should have used "Rhomboid" instead.

Offline hesham

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 22793
« Last Edit: February 02, 2013, 08:59:51 am by hesham »

Offline AeroFranz

  • Aerospace Engineer
  • Top Contributor
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • ***
  • Posts: 2115
Re: Warren-Young Skycar tailless aircraft
« Reply #7 on: October 30, 2008, 08:13:00 am »
I was wondering if there is a difference between a joined-wing and a Warren-wing configuration. if not, what should it be called?
I know the major proponent of the joined wing, Julian Wolkowitch, was working on it in the eighties. That makes the "Warren wing" at least 40 years older (but then again there might have been even earlier proponents of this configuration).
All modern aircraft have four dimensions: span, length, height and politics.   TSR.2 got the first three right - Sir Sydney Camm

Offline hesham

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 22793
Re: Warren-Young Skycar tailless aircraft
« Reply #8 on: January 11, 2019, 07:10:36 am »

Offline riggerrob

  • CLEARANCE: Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 270
  • I really should change my personal text
Re: Warren-Young Skycar tailless aircraft
« Reply #9 on: January 11, 2019, 01:52:48 pm »
Warren wing seems to have all wing surfaces on almost the same plane/planform. Warren just eliminated the centre section because it contributes the least to lift or stability.
We have to laugh that Warren felt the need to install a gun turret in the tail of his proposed fighter! Hah! Hah!
Must be a British eccentricity like the ill-fated Boulton-Paul Deciant and Blackburn Roc turret fighters. Too  bad the Luftwaffe never read that battle plan!
Hah!
Hah!

Joined wings start with wing roots at different levels, but dihedral and anhedral make them meet at the wing tips. Supposedly joining wing tips reduces drag by reducing the number of wing tips, like that proposed replacement for Lockheed S-3 Viking. As an aside, they proposed that joined wing configuration to install fixed radar receivers in the leading and trailing edges to allow it to takeover the mission flown by the giant rotating radar disc atop Grumman E-2 and Boeing AWACS.
Joined wings can also enjoy structural advantages if they are aligned with lift and drag loads, creating g essentially a very deep box spar (like a biplane) allowing them to be built lighter than cantilever wings
None of those sketches really show rhomboids because true rhomboids are parallelograms without 90 degree corners.
 That Canora and fiticious Migs are more lop-sided diamonds or kite shapes. Since the Canora is almost square it wins a prize for the maximum wing area per square foot of deck space!
« Last Edit: January 11, 2019, 04:15:00 pm by riggerrob »