Apophenia said:* I presume that there was no 'AG-13' for superstitious reasons
walter said:Hi Stéphane,
Do you have sources for any relationship between NX37601 and the AG-14? NX37601 was a 4-seater and much heavier then the AG-14 which was developed Texas, while NX37601 originated in the Detroit. MI area.
I think the AG-14 total is 6.
walter said:... Model 21 or CW-21 by Curtiss Wright...
walter said:Hi Stéphane.
I feel it is historically not correct to mark NX37601 as AG-14 pre-prototype or related to the AG-14. Aerofiles lists the aircraft (in my opinion correctly) as the Model 21 or CW-21 by Curtiss Wright. In addition Aerofiles gives the AG-14 POP also as 6.
The 7th AG-14 may have been the airframe used for static tests, but w/o registration and/or s/n .
PS: For NX37061 I donot only rely on Aerofiles. In several searches I conducted I always encountered NX37061 as the CW-21, a bigger and heavier 4-seat aircraft than the 2-seat AG-14.
51, 51A 19?? (A11SW) = No data.
hesham said:I think it was a misprint,and maybe they meant AG-15 ?.
Skyblazer said:hesham said:I think it was a misprint,and maybe they meant AG-15 ?.
NO.
hesham said:Why not ?.
hesham said:Hi,
the AND-51 was a registration and not designation model,and of course I know it from long time,but
I couldn't convince as it was from his series
Note that the name is Bellanca T-250 Aries, after the zodiacal sign. SDASM has it wrongly spelt.