- Joined
- 26 May 2011
- Messages
- 2,276
- Reaction score
- 3,290
Thanks! I just won a fiver!No they can't. Any publisher/author putting notes online should be dealt with the Petrograd NKVD paper method.
Chris
Thanks! I just won a fiver!No they can't. Any publisher/author putting notes online should be dealt with the Petrograd NKVD paper method.
30 years ago, I remember going to the USAF Museum at Wright-Pat and being stunned by the size and scope of the bookstore within the gift shop. All before EPay, Amazon, etc. and titles I would never see at Borders (long gone) or Barnes & Noble. Go there today, it is a gift shop with an occasional book here and there.
50 % minimum of that is mine! Putting notes of a book online is like selling a car with the engine having to be bought separately.Thanks! I just won a fiver!
Chris
You fit the bill.I use the word 'amateur' to mean we do it for love, not money, rather than poorly produced
Interestingly, one publisher, in a post on the The Aviation Enthusiast's Book Club, has declared the UK aviation book business 'finished' and has said they won't be producing paper content any more (I paraphrase on both points here, please feel free to clarify if you're reading this). I find this alarming as they
Harpia Publishing.Which publisher was that ? Assume they will be producing more e-books instead ?
Like a winning racehorse, you might get an apple. Or a wonky carrot. Probably the carrot.
I hope SPF members are also aware of the Facebook Group The Aviation Enthusiast's Book Club (see here https://www.facebook.com/groups/359410134220076/ ). Worth a look if you are reading this thread.
While the high cost of books has been decried long and weary on there (and on here), there appears to be no appetite amongst publishers to address this. One way of reducing these costs is to reduce page count, possible to a certain extent by better design. Put the ~30% of a book that is citation pages online and, while you won't reduce the cost of a book by 30%, it might reduce the cost in some way, especially in low print-run works. (Oh! Don't mention Works on TAEBC. No, they don't hate Queen)
The citation racket has been used in the academic world to get funding, fair enough if that's what it takes but I see no need for it in the 'amateur' world. I use the word 'amateur' to mean we do it for love, not money, rather than poorly produced*. References, yes, but pages and pages of citations to namecheck your mates? No.
Interestingly, one publisher, in a post on the The Aviation Enthusiast's Book Club, has declared the UK aviation book business 'finished' and has said they won't be producing paper content any more (I paraphrase on both points here, please feel free to clarify if you're reading this). I find this alarming as they produce good books on interesting, and niche, subjects.
I have (long and weary again) been Cassandra-like in my forecasts of The Big Boy's Book of Aircraft in Colour being the only aircraft books available. That might just be where we are heading if quality material is only available under an Elsevier-type model as used for academic journals.
Chris
*I'll keep schtum on this matter.
Books should remain to be stand alone self contained sources of information that do not require any access to any electronic media at all to reap their full value to the reader. For good reason nobody ever asks "Which three books and a solar powered laptop with broadband satellite internet connectivity would you bring to a deserted island?"Like a winning racehorse, you might get an apple. Or a wonky carrot. Probably the carrot.
I hope SPF members are also aware of the Facebook Group The Aviation Enthusiast's Book Club (see here https://www.facebook.com/groups/359410134220076/ ). Worth a look if you are reading this thread.
While the high cost of books has been decried long and weary on there (and on here), there appears to be no appetite amongst publishers to address this. One way of reducing these costs is to reduce page count, possible to a certain extent by better design. Put the ~30% of a book that is citation pages online and, while you won't reduce the cost of a book by 30%, it might reduce the cost in some way, especially in low print-run works. (Oh! Don't mention Works on TAEBC. No, they don't hate Queen)
The citation racket has been used in the academic world to get funding, fair enough if that's what it takes but I see no need for it in the 'amateur' world. I use the word 'amateur' to mean we do it for love, not money, rather than poorly produced*. References, yes, but pages and pages of citations to namecheck your mates? No.
Interestingly, one publisher, in a post on the The Aviation Enthusiast's Book Club, has declared the UK aviation book business 'finished' and has said they won't be producing paper content any more (I paraphrase on both points here, please feel free to clarify if you're reading this). I find this alarming as they produce good books on interesting, and niche, subjects.
I have (long and weary again) been Cassandra-like in my forecasts of The Big Boy's Book of Aircraft in Colour being the only aircraft books available. That might just be where we are heading if quality material is only available under an Elsevier-type model as used for academic journals.
Chris
*I'll keep schtum on this matter.
Having around 2000 books, soft cover publications, etc.(does not include about 10,00 periodicals in the barn, photos, documents, etc.),I am continually amazed at the number of good quality aviation books still becoming available. Don't really care what the bindings are like, but I do appreciate good paper and high quality printing. Considering that when I really started buying books, a new Porsche could be had for $3000 (give or take) and now is about 30 times that cost. There are a lot of pretty good books in the $60 dollar range. I could not get much of a book for $2 in the old days, plus the titles and range of content were much more limited. I did spend over $100 for a recent Porsche book, but most of the aviation books are well under that and many of them have really good content. As to e-format, when I go to the mountains of Costa Rica in the winter, I take my laptop with an external hard drive with about 10K books and 9k periodicals on it. I never run out of good stuff to read. Could not do that in the old days! Inflation is real, but book supply is amazingly robust.Books should remain to be stand alone self contained sources of information that do not require any access to any electronic media at all to reap their full value to the reader. For good reason nobody ever asks "Which three books and a solar powered laptop with broadband satellite internet connectivity would you bring to a deserted island?"
No argument here - I am not arguing against e-books as a valid choice. What I *AM* arguing against is putting part of the information that completes a physical book, such as a list of sources, references, or websites, online *only* instead of also including it in print.Having around 2000 books, soft cover publications, etc.(does not include about 10,00 periodicals in the barn, photos, documents, etc.),I am continually amazed at the number of good quality aviation books still becoming available. Don't really care what the bindings are like, but I do appreciate good paper and high quality printing. Considering that when I really started buying books, a new Porsche could be had for $3000 (give or take) and now is about 30 times that cost. There are a lot of pretty good books in the $60 dollar range. I could not get much of a book for $2 in the old days, plus the titles and range of content were much more limited. I did spend over $100 for a recent Porsche book, but most of the aviation books are well under that and many of them have really good content. As to e-format, when I go to the mountains of Costa Rica in the winter, I take my laptop with an external hard drive with about 10K books and 9k periodicals on it. I never run out of good stuff to read. Could not do that in the old days! Inflation is real, but book supply is amazingly robust.
ArtieBoB
No argument here - I am not arguing against e-books as a valid choice. What I *AM* arguing against is putting part of the information that completes a physical book, such as a list of sources, references, or websites, online *only* instead of also including it in print.
We did that, put additional info out in the ether, with Overscan's P.1121 and that seemed to be well received.I agree 100%. All of the information should come in one printed book - not the book plus what's out in the ether.