Those are nowhere near powerful enough for a plane that will be at least the size of a Tomcat.
That depends on TWR you want; GCAP consorsium doesn't appear to be bothered.
And iirc there are indications FA-XX won't be especially super size.
 
That depends on TWR you want;
TWR > 1 at 50% fuel with full air-to-air loadout. Basic fighter standard.

40klbs empty weight, ~8klbs of ordnance, and ~14klbs of fuel means a minimum of 62,000lbs of thrust is required. That's 31-35k per engine.

F-22 standard would be TWR >1 at takeoff with full fuel and air-to-air loadout. minimum 40k per engine.



GCAP consorsium doesn't appear to be bothered.
GCAP consortium isn't bothering right now with the demonstrator. They aren't using EJ200s for the actual GCAP, but something bigger.



And iirc there are indications FA-XX won't be especially super size.
If it cannot carry 4x GBU-31s internally, what's the point of buying FAXX versus more F-35Cs?
 
GCAP consortium isn't bothering right now with the demonstrator. They aren't using EJ200s for the actual GCAP, but something bigger.
They specifically said they aren't aiming for a very high TWR for the eventual fighter, not for the demo.
If it cannot carry 4x GBU-31s internally, what's the point of buying FAXX versus more F-35Cs?
Why are 4 GBU-31s internally so important? The goal is to replace F/A-18E/F; why not 4 blackbeard/jsow?
 
They specifically said they aren't aiming for a very high TWR for the eventual fighter, not for the demo.

Why are 4 GBU-31s internally so important? The goal is to replace F/A-18E/F; why not 4 blackbeard/jsow?
LOL.
 
Agreed about the AIM-424s Scott Kenny, I also think that they will be the primary air-air missile.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom