US Army wants the Spruance air-capable destroyer - USAV McGuire

JoeCalPo

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
24 January 2022
Messages
72
Reaction score
119
I put this model in this area as it is a stretch from reality. The ship model was, as recall, a Minicraft.
Posting it as an aside to the current discussions about the Air-Capable and other Spruance designs.

The idea is the US Army, long possessing a fleet of ships, decides they want the last Spruance, the DDH version, with modifications.
The forward 5" replaced by a 155mm howitzer turret. Yes, it would need mods for sea services. The German Navy actually did this.
Aft I added a ramp for amphib vehicles.
The helo is an MH-60. I had an OH-6 too but cannot find it.
McGuire is the famous USAAC fighter pilot, with a base here in New Jersey.
 

Attachments

  • USAV McGuire forward.jpeg
    USAV McGuire forward.jpeg
    58.6 KB · Views: 62
  • USAV McGuire port forward.jpeg
    USAV McGuire port forward.jpeg
    58.2 KB · Views: 63
  • USAV McGuire starboard.jpeg
    USAV McGuire starboard.jpeg
    73 KB · Views: 68
  • USAV McGuire aft starboard.jpeg
    USAV McGuire aft starboard.jpeg
    60.7 KB · Views: 67
  • USAV MbGuire aft above.jpeg
    USAV MbGuire aft above.jpeg
    65.7 KB · Views: 61
Why would you need the 155 mm cannon? unless it's for litoral operation?
Anyhow, for DDH I'm wondering why the MH-53 was never considered when it could have added the mining/ sweeping capabillity.
 
It is a special ops carrier, hence the howitzer and amphibs.
I have an H-53 in scale, and it would not fit. Maybe if the flight deck were extended like the Japanese DDHs or the Italian helicopter carriers, but the H-53 is BIG>
I was able to fit the UH-1 and AH-1, while a Sea King is a stretch. Medium and small helos.
 
To get what they want ypu pretty much want everything above deck moved forward to add space for a landing pad extension. If they end the current deck back it probably dramatically throws the yaw balance off in anything above sea state 1 without adds extra buoyancy to the stern. Maybe they can add an underwater wing that is retractable to avoid more hull changes?
 
For stabillity and copping with higher tonnage the easiest solution is to add bulges on the sides. This will increase drag & lower speed but increase side protection, though.
 
Back
Top Bottom