Tu-22M3K + "Skif" Air Launch

TSARb

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
8 March 2011
Messages
122
Reaction score
324
The Skif air-launched space system, based on the Tu-22M3 bomber, was conceived as a commercial launch vehicle for delivering payloads into low-Earth orbit.

The project called for a specially modified Tu-22M3K carrier aircraft and the Skif space booster. K in M3K stands for the "Kosmos" (Russian for "space"); Skif means Scythian - an ancient nomad of Scyths people.
Tupolev was responsible for the overall system and the carrier aircraft, while the Raduga Design Bureau was the lead developer of the booster.

Skif system was designed to launch small satellites weighing up to 300 kg into Earth orbits ranging from 200 to 2,800 km in altitude. Its intended applications included satellite communications, Earth observation, and scientific research of the upper atmosphere and near-Earth space.

The air-launch concept offered several advantages over conventional ground-launched rockets. The carrier aircraft gave the rocket an initial boost in speed and altitude, reducing both the required delta-v and aerodynamic losses. It could also fly to a favorable launch latitude and take better advantage of the Earth’s rotation.

Another major advantage was orbital flexibility. Instead of being constrained by the launch azimuths available from a fixed spaceport, the Tu-22M3K could carry the rocket to a suitable launch point — potentially even over the ocean — and inject the payload into a much wider range of orbital inclinations.

The aircraft could also deliver the rocket directly into the plane of the desired orbit. This reduced the need for costly plane-change maneuvers after launch and allowed more of the satellite’s own propellant to be reserved for its mission.

The system was intended to be responsive and mobile: satellites could be launched on relatively short notice, making it possible to deploy or replenish a constellation quickly. The documentation even envisioned flying the entire system to airfields outside Russia, where the rocket could be integrated with its payload and launched for a foreign customer.

The concept of the Skif air-launched space system was based on extensive use of existing hardware. Its key element was the Tu-22M3 carrier aircraft, whose characteristics and technical capabilities largely determined the design parameters of the space booster. Since the booster was to be carried externally beneath the aircraft fuselage, its dimensions were limited to approximately:

— 17 m in length;
— 1.5 m in diameter.

The aircraft’s payload capacity limited the combined mass of the space booster and the airborne launch unit to no more than 20 tonnes. According to the preliminary mass allocation, the booster itself was limited to 17.3 tonnes.

Ballistic design studies were used to determine the payload capability to the types of orbit considered most in demand on the commercial space-launch market. For polar and Sun-synchronous orbits, the Skif system could deliver 220–250 kg to a 600 km orbit, depending on the booster configuration. For medium-inclination orbits, payload capacity could reach 300 kg. These figures were adopted as design requirements for the payload compartment and the space platform.

The required thrust range of the booster’s first-stage propulsion system was 21–26 tonnes-force, based on a required initial thrust-to-weight ratio of 1.2–1.5. No series-produced liquid-propellant rocket engine was available in this thrust class. The required performance could, however, be achieved using a propulsion system consisting of two modified RD-0242 engines equipped for thrust-vector control. Their combined thrust would be about 25 tonnes-force.

The same engine, throttled to 8.5 tonnes-force, could be used on the second stage. In its original configuration, the RD-0242 used UDMH/N₂O₄ propellants, although variants using less toxic propellant combinations had also been studied.

The source:
A. Pukhov, Skif: An Air-Launched Space System Based on the Tu-22M3 Aircraft. Preliminary Design, Book 1. Moscow, 2003. (Пухов А.Л. "Скиф" Авиационно-космический комплекс на базе самолёта Ту-22М3 / Эскизный проект, книга 1, Москва, 2003)
 

Attachments

  • pic14.png
    pic14.png
    249 KB · Views: 197
  • pi11.png
    pi11.png
    253.4 KB · Views: 161
  • table.png
    table.png
    61.1 KB · Views: 83
  • pic81.png
    pic81.png
    216.4 KB · Views: 109
  • HO-gQotXcAE4YzD.jpg
    HO-gQotXcAE4YzD.jpg
    296.3 KB · Views: 101
  • pic12.png
    pic12.png
    107.1 KB · Views: 99
Last edited by a moderator:
Amazing,many thanks,

and by the way,Tu22-M3 was also called Tu-32.
 
Air-launch seems to be a solution in search of a problem. Pegasus wasn't notably in demand IIRC.
 
The answer is "supersonic air launch" - note pic. 1.4.

After all, Skif supposed to be way lighter than comparable launch vehicles. Its closest competitors are:

VehicleLaunch mass, tonnesPayload to LEO, kgPayload to 600 km SSO, kg
Ceres-133420285
Hyperbola-1 /long 24m/42520275
Skif 17300250
Kuaizhou-1A30300225
Shtil (R-29RM conversion)39280200
Electron13300190
Jielong-123250175
 
Moar:

Stage IIIIII
Propellants Kerosene + N₂O₄ Kerosene + N₂O₄ UDMH + N₂O₄
Thrust (vacuum), kgf25000125003500
Specific impulse (vacuum), s331331305

...

The basic equipment and systems of the Tu-22M3K are essentially the same as those of the standard Tu-22M3. Equipment used for special-purpose missions is removed from the Tu-22M3, while equipment and systems required for operation of the space booster and for the Tu-22M3K to function as part of the Skif air-launched space system are installed.

Compared with the standard operational Tu-22M3, the Tu-22M3K carrier aircraft:

- has the standard bomb-bay doors replaced by a bomb-bay fairing with a raised aft section to accommodate the space booster. The fairing incorporates access hatches for equipment and systems located in the bomb bay;
- is equipped with forward and aft attachment points for the space booster, devices for mounting the booster to the wing center section and fuselage near Frame 54, and electrical connectors for interfacing with the booster’s onboard radio-electronic equipment;
- has a reinforced fuselage to accommodate the revised attachment arrangement and the increased load compared with the standard Kh-22 missile;
- is fitted with a redesigned aft section of the vertical stabilizer in place of the removed tail gun installation and its sighting system.

To further improve aerodynamic performance, Tupolev, jointly with TsAGI, developed a series of measures aimed at improving local aerodynamics. These were validated using a scale model of the Tu-22M3 in TsAGI wind tunnels T-106, T-128, T-102, and T-109. Design documentation for the proposed modifications was subsequently prepared.

To increase the excess thrust available with a large external store and to increase flight range, the following modifications were considered advisable for the Tu-22M3K:

1. Modification of the wing contours:

- a new fairing over the wing pivot joint, without the aerodynamic fence;
- new wing leading-edge sections;
- new wingtips.

These modifications increase the maximum lift-to-drag ratio, Kmax, by 3.3–5.5%.

2. Modification of the contours of the aft fuselage in the area of the removed tail gun installation.

Experimental studies by TsAGI indicate that this increases Kmax by 2.1%.

3. Improvements to local aerodynamics and the quality of the aircraft’s external surfaces:

- trimming the ends of the spoiler sections in the direction of airflow at a wing sweep angle of χ = 30°, and closing the gaps between them;
- sealing the gaps around the rudder;
- reducing the gap between the rudder leading edge and the vertical-stabilizer skin.

These modifications provide a further increase in Kmax of approximately 3%.

Implementation of the complete package of aerodynamic improvements would increase the aircraft’s maximum lift-to-drag ratio in subsonic cruise by approximately 10%, corresponding to an increase in subsonic flight range of approximately 600 km.
 
Makes me wonder if the B-58 were still around would they be trying to stick a launcher under it. It was practically made for the mission.
 
Thanks for all this. Damn interesting stuff. Reminds me of Burlak using a Tu-160. Then again, both Russians and Ukrainians had a whole lot of projects like this, using either bombers or large fighters and of course cargo planes.
Il-76
An-22
An-124
An-225
Tu-160
Tu-22M
MiG-31
Su-27
 
Last edited:

About a decade ago I was at an AIAA conference and the guy who created Pegasus talked about that program and why it failed. He admitted that they had way over-estimated the market.

There were some other people talking about proposed air-launch vehicles and I believe that one presenter said that by his calculation, there was something like 200 (yes, TWO HUNDRED) then-current proposals. He said that only a handful had any money, and he expected only 1-2 to succeed. We know what happened with Virgin Orbit. We know what happened with Stratolaunch. And they both had a lot of money.
 
Antonio Elias ? A long time ago he was a member at NSF forum. Nice fellow, great humour - and yeah he admitted Pegasus wasn't a commercial success.

Yes. I saw him at AIAA SciTech in 2016 (I have worked with him since then). He said that their 1987 estimate was 10-20 satellites a year launched by Pegasus by 1989. That was way off. He shared this photo.
 

Attachments

  • 558670242_10231941089497344_9172299672302917260_n.jpg
    558670242_10231941089497344_9172299672302917260_n.jpg
    254.3 KB · Views: 63
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm writing a short article about the Skif rocket proposal. Here is something I came across about the Tu-22M3.
 

Attachments

  • Tu-22M3 Article.pdf
    1.3 MB · Views: 15

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom