Time for Space Force to ‘clearly say’ it needs ‘weapons in space’: SPACECOM head

SDA opens contest for 54 ‘Tranche 3’ missile tracking satellites​






 
Last edited:
Time for Space Force to ‘clearly say’ it needs ‘weapons in space’: SPACECOM head
I suspect that it would be a rather long period, when space-to-space missiles would be claimed to be "maneuverable sattelite inspectors" (and it would generally be the truth... because inspector vehicle capable of precisely closing with other satellite would also be able to ram it)
 
I suspect that it would be a rather long period, when space-to-space missiles would be claimed to be "maneuverable sattelite inspectors" (and it would generally be the truth... because inspector vehicle capable of precisely closing with other satellite would also be able to ram it)
If a spacecraft is capable of closely examining another, "ramming" wouldn't even be needed. A can of black spray paint will do the job.
 




The Space Force is ready to start government testing of a ground-based satellite jammer upgrade that it hopes will make the system more mobile, user friendly and effective as an electronic warfare platform.

L3Harris, which built the baseline Counter Communications System, or CCS, announced April 8 that the upgraded capability passed a recent verification review, which means it is ready to transition to the Space Force for developmental and operational testing.
 
Last edited:

 
Last edited:
"COCOMs reported after these tests that J-REN and SlimGIMS not only met the capability gap, but also reduced the time to create a collection request from an hour to 5 minutes," an NGA spokesperson told Breaking Defense.
 


 
Last edited:
It’s interesting that not only was Phase 3 used for the April 20th launch, that was the second NRO proliferated architecture launch for that month and the 9th dedicated launch overall since last May. By my tally, that is 178 satellites - dedicated launches of 21 (4), 22 (3), 17, and 11. Two more apparently went up with a batch of Starlink sats last November (possibly experimental) for a total of 180 known objects inside a one year period.

That is a rather stunning increase in recon density. We do not know payloads and exact orbits, but there must be a dramatic decrease in revisit times coming (not all sats are in final orbits) associated with that many platforms. And we have no idea when this launch cadence will pause either - this could be the new normal.
 


 
Do I read right?!

  • Standoff strike, or space- or terrestrial-based long-range fires that can attack without needing to get close to the target

Terrestrial being off-world based counter fire?!! :D

Source (as linked above by @Forest Green ):

I am surprised however to see that space beamed energy or rocket cargo supply is not one of their listed priority.
 
Last edited:
Do I read right?!



Terrestrial being off-world based counter fire?!! :D
Terrestrial is Earth-based, but the fact it is preceded with 'space- or' seems to indicate orbitally-based counter-fire.

The Space Force does not yet have the ability to perform all the operations it lists—the framework mentions hitting terrestrial targets with space-based fires
 
Just throw a couple of these on it. View attachment 768135
A load with one large tungsten ball and a bit of tungsten birdshot would seem to cover the bases. Alternating with high explosive bolter rounds, perhaps...

The satellite could include the upper torso of an evolved Optimus android to both aim and reload.
 
bg,f8f8f8-flat,750x,075,f-pad,750x1000,f8f8f8.jpg


Rubber chicken?!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom