• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Supermarine Type 327

Flitzer

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Messages
1,004
Reaction score
18
I'm only getting single images attaching to post..
No problem...

Cheers
Peter
 

Attachments

Flitzer

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Messages
1,004
Reaction score
18
Last one for now...

I have more if anyone would like to see.

Cheers and thanks
Peter
 

Attachments

Flitzer

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Messages
1,004
Reaction score
18
Hi and thanks Matej
yes I did...but only got singles....Saudi gravity or something?

Cheers
Peter
:)
 

Antonio

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Staff member
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
3,420
Reaction score
124
Wow Peter,

You're a first class artist!. These is the way I love to see unbuilt projects: alive.
Thanks for sharing your art with us :)

Cheers
Antonio


Orinblamblam your bombers book will look incredible which such gorgeous profiles
 

red admiral

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Messages
583
Reaction score
45
Probably a filesize limit on what you can attach. Or act of god.
 

Sundog

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
2,737
Reaction score
175
These look excellent Flitzer! Nice work. ;)
 

thewanderingmind

Werfless
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
First time I'd seen these two aircraft, but, Flitzer: Damn, you're good! That's really excellent!
 

lark

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
1,793
Reaction score
53
Excellent art work Flitzer.
You bring the designs to life...
 

Skybolt

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
2,297
Reaction score
99
And now, the question everyone was keen to ask, but didn't... What kind of software are you using? :D
And, naturally, the pictures are super.... But anyone in Luft46 melée already knew ;D
 

Flitzer

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Messages
1,004
Reaction score
18
Hi Skybolt...

The profiles are computer generated using Freehand 9 for keyline and basic drawing out and Photoshop for assembly and colour work on a Mac.
If you are interested I did a "How to do your own colour profiles" feature on Armorama, now in the Aeroscale section. I did it way back and since then my techniques and methods have developed somewhat.

Are you going to have a go?

Cheers
Peter
::) ;D ;)
 

Graham1973

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
1,436
Reaction score
181
Sorry to bump an old thread like this, but I spotted the pictures and wondered if anyone had more information on this 'twin-Spitfire', I mean it's obviously a competitor for the Westland Whirlwind, but what was the specification.
 

Apophenia

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
2,425
Reaction score
632
Graham1973 said:
... it's obviously a competitor for the Westland Whirlwind, but what was the specification.
Not really, Westland designed the Whirlwind to F.37/35. The Type 327 was a late submission (Aug 1938) to F.18/37. IIRC, the Type 327 was meant to replace Supermarine's earlier F.18/37 submission, the Type 325 (the pusher Type 324 having already been rejected).
 

Graham1973

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
1,436
Reaction score
181
Well she looks a fine bird, probably not a good dog-fighter (But then the Fighting Area Attacks didn't need one). That said she might have given the bombers a nasty surprise, provided of course, her 'little sisters' (Spitfires) could keep the BF-109's away.

Makes one wish Lucasarts had done a 'Secret Weapons of the RAF'.
 

Spark

CLEARANCE: Secret
Joined
Aug 29, 2008
Messages
361
Reaction score
8
Hi,
The Westland Whirlwind was reputed to be better than the 109 below about 15,000ft.
The Type 327 would have had about 50% more power, better at altitude and narrower wingspan.
Agreed she looks a fine bird.


Graham1973 said:
Well she looks a fine bird, probably not a good dog-fighter (But then the Fighting Area Attacks didn't need one). That said she might have given the bombers a nasty surprise, provided of course, her 'little sisters' (Spitfires) could keep the BF-109's away.

Makes one wish Lucasarts had done a 'Secret Weapons of the RAF'.
 

JFC Fuller

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
3,327
Reaction score
473
I found the below diagram whilst digging around online, does anybody know which book it is from?

Just a remark based on a cursory look but the radiator in the outer wing looks very small to me.
 

Attachments

JFC Fuller

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
3,327
Reaction score
473
From the UK National Archives today- in which the entire Supermarine 327 brochure survives along with Air Ministry notes on it.

Note that total internal fuel is 220 imp gallons.

The files are clear that the armament arrangement was regarded as impractical (hard to disagree with) the pilot view was questioned (though the gunsight view was preferred compared to the Spitfire/Hurricane) and mostly importantly a large part of the decision making group thought turret fighters were the future and thus wanted no additional types beyond the Whirlwind, Tempest/Typhoon and Boulton Paul P.92 in development- which is interesting. In addition there were concerns about the design capacity at Supermarine given the number of projects they were working on and likely to bid on. There was also an offer to replace the cannon with 12 x .303 machine guns mounted in the outer wings but this was frowned upon because of likely scattering in the fire caused by wing flexing, although this does make me wonder whether additional fuel tanks could have been installed in the out wings.
 

Attachments

Schneiderman

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
1,336
Reaction score
272
All three projects to highlight the differences, taken from Beyond the Spitfire
 

Attachments

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
6,909
Reaction score
1,897
I got "Beyond the Spitfire"!! Excellent and exciting book. :eek:
 

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
6,909
Reaction score
1,897
Hi!
http://modelplanes.de/royal-air-force/jaeger-royal-air-force/supermarine-327-spito-unicraft-resin/
 

Attachments

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
6,909
Reaction score
1,897
JFC Fuller said:
From the UK National Archives today- in which the entire Supermarine 327 brochure survives along with Air Ministry notes on it.

Note that total internal fuel is 220 imp gallons.

The files are clear that the armament arrangement was regarded as impractical (hard to disagree with) the pilot view was questioned (though the gunsight view was preferred compared to the Spitfire/Hurricane) and mostly importantly a large part of the decision making group thought turret fighters were the future and thus wanted no additional types beyond the Whirlwind, Tempest/Typhoon and Boulton Paul P.92 in development- which is interesting. In addition there were concerns about the design capacity at Supermarine given the number of projects they were working on and likely to bid on. There was also an offer to replace the cannon with 12 x .303 machine guns mounted in the outer wings but this was frowned upon because of likely scattering in the fire caused by wing flexing, although this does make me wonder whether additional fuel tanks could have been installed in the out wings.
Amazing!! :eek:
 

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
6,909
Reaction score
1,897
Hi!
https://elpoderdelasgalaxias.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/page/4/
 

Attachments

Top