• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Supermarine Type 327

Flitzer

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Messages
1,004
Reaction score
35
I'm only getting single images attaching to post..
No problem...

Cheers
Peter
 

Attachments

  • 14.jpg
    14.jpg
    135.7 KB · Views: 1,300

Flitzer

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Messages
1,004
Reaction score
35
Last one for now...

I have more if anyone would like to see.

Cheers and thanks
Peter
 

Attachments

  • 13.jpg
    13.jpg
    114.9 KB · Views: 1,210

Flitzer

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Messages
1,004
Reaction score
35
Hi and thanks Matej
yes I did...but only got singles....Saudi gravity or something?

Cheers
Peter
:)
 

Antonio

ACCESS: Top Secret
Staff member
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
3,539
Reaction score
320
Wow Peter,

You're a first class artist!. These is the way I love to see unbuilt projects: alive.
Thanks for sharing your art with us :)

Cheers
Antonio


Orinblamblam your bombers book will look incredible which such gorgeous profiles
 

Sundog

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
2,876
Reaction score
366
These look excellent Flitzer! Nice work. ;)
 

lark

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
1,810
Reaction score
96
Excellent art work Flitzer.
You bring the designs to life...
 

Skybolt

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
2,299
Reaction score
154
And now, the question everyone was keen to ask, but didn't... What kind of software are you using? :D
And, naturally, the pictures are super.... But anyone in Luft46 melée already knew ;D
 

Flitzer

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Messages
1,004
Reaction score
35
Hi Skybolt...

The profiles are computer generated using Freehand 9 for keyline and basic drawing out and Photoshop for assembly and colour work on a Mac.
If you are interested I did a "How to do your own colour profiles" feature on Armorama, now in the Aeroscale section. I did it way back and since then my techniques and methods have developed somewhat.

Are you going to have a go?

Cheers
Peter
::) ;D ;)
 

Graham1973

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
1,615
Reaction score
376
Sorry to bump an old thread like this, but I spotted the pictures and wondered if anyone had more information on this 'twin-Spitfire', I mean it's obviously a competitor for the Westland Whirlwind, but what was the specification.
 

Apophenia

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
2,725
Reaction score
1,173
Graham1973 said:
... it's obviously a competitor for the Westland Whirlwind, but what was the specification.

Not really, Westland designed the Whirlwind to F.37/35. The Type 327 was a late submission (Aug 1938) to F.18/37. IIRC, the Type 327 was meant to replace Supermarine's earlier F.18/37 submission, the Type 325 (the pusher Type 324 having already been rejected).
 

Graham1973

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
1,615
Reaction score
376
Well she looks a fine bird, probably not a good dog-fighter (But then the Fighting Area Attacks didn't need one). That said she might have given the bombers a nasty surprise, provided of course, her 'little sisters' (Spitfires) could keep the BF-109's away.

Makes one wish Lucasarts had done a 'Secret Weapons of the RAF'.
 

Flitzer

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Messages
1,004
Reaction score
35
325 Taurus engined pusher for comparison.


Many thanks
P
 

Attachments

  • 13SM325.jpg
    13SM325.jpg
    125.4 KB · Views: 997
  • 14SM325.jpg
    14SM325.jpg
    111.4 KB · Views: 990

Spark

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Aug 29, 2008
Messages
361
Reaction score
43
Hi,
The Westland Whirlwind was reputed to be better than the 109 below about 15,000ft.
The Type 327 would have had about 50% more power, better at altitude and narrower wingspan.
Agreed she looks a fine bird.


Graham1973 said:
Well she looks a fine bird, probably not a good dog-fighter (But then the Fighting Area Attacks didn't need one). That said she might have given the bombers a nasty surprise, provided of course, her 'little sisters' (Spitfires) could keep the BF-109's away.

Makes one wish Lucasarts had done a 'Secret Weapons of the RAF'.
 

JFC Fuller

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
2,593
Reaction score
1,015
From the UK National Archives - in which the entire Supermarine 327 brochure survives along with Air Ministry notes on it.

Note that total internal fuel is 220 imp gallons.

The files are clear that the armament arrangement was regarded as impractical (hard to disagree with) the pilot view was questioned (though the gunsight view was preferred compared to the Spitfire/Hurricane) and mostly importantly a large part of the decision making group thought turret fighters were the future and thus wanted no additional types beyond the Whirlwind, Tempest/Typhoon and Boulton Paul P.92 in development- which is interesting. In addition there were concerns about the design capacity at Supermarine given the number of projects they were working on and likely to bid on. There was also an offer to replace the cannon with 12 x .303 machine guns mounted in the outer wings but this was frowned upon because of likely scattering in the fire caused by wing flexing, although this does make me wonder whether additional fuel tanks could have been installed in the outer wings.
 

Attachments

  • SPM 327 GA.jpg
    SPM 327 GA.jpg
    82.9 KB · Views: 525
  • SPM 327 Forward.jpg
    SPM 327 Forward.jpg
    130.5 KB · Views: 507
  • SPM 327 Wing.jpg
    SPM 327 Wing.jpg
    126.2 KB · Views: 225
  • SPM 327 Cannon.jpg
    SPM 327 Cannon.jpg
    119.5 KB · Views: 223
Last edited:

Schneiderman

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
1,511
Reaction score
655
All three projects to highlight the differences, taken from Beyond the Spitfire
 

Attachments

  • 324etc.jpg
    324etc.jpg
    144.2 KB · Views: 219

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
7,740
Reaction score
3,325
I got "Beyond the Spitfire"!! Excellent and exciting book. :eek:
 

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
7,740
Reaction score
3,325
Hi!
http://modelplanes.de/royal-air-force/jaeger-royal-air-force/supermarine-327-spito-unicraft-resin/
 

Attachments

  • 1226.jpg
    1226.jpg
    403.5 KB · Views: 138

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
7,740
Reaction score
3,325
JFC Fuller said:
From the UK National Archives today- in which the entire Supermarine 327 brochure survives along with Air Ministry notes on it.

Note that total internal fuel is 220 imp gallons.

The files are clear that the armament arrangement was regarded as impractical (hard to disagree with) the pilot view was questioned (though the gunsight view was preferred compared to the Spitfire/Hurricane) and mostly importantly a large part of the decision making group thought turret fighters were the future and thus wanted no additional types beyond the Whirlwind, Tempest/Typhoon and Boulton Paul P.92 in development- which is interesting. In addition there were concerns about the design capacity at Supermarine given the number of projects they were working on and likely to bid on. There was also an offer to replace the cannon with 12 x .303 machine guns mounted in the outer wings but this was frowned upon because of likely scattering in the fire caused by wing flexing, although this does make me wonder whether additional fuel tanks could have been installed in the out wings.
Amazing!! :eek:
 

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
7,740
Reaction score
3,325
Hi!
https://elpoderdelasgalaxias.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/page/4/
 

Attachments

  • Supermarine_327-03.jpg
    Supermarine_327-03.jpg
    145.4 KB · Views: 156

Schneiderman

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
1,511
Reaction score
655
From, Secrets of the Spitfire.
Two captions in one, the lower one not relevant to the picture.
So, Coles caption to the image is wrong in four regards. The project has not remained unseen for decades, it has been shown many times before. The Types 234, 235 and 237 were not designed by Shenstone, as with other Supermarine projects he would have contributed aerodynamic knowledge but he was never the lead designer on any of them. The B.12/36 bomber was also not designed by him, neither was it delta winged. How do you get so much wrong in one caption?
 

Similar threads

Top