• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Sukhoi Shkval Tailsitter fighter

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
27,302
Reaction score
4,065
Hi,

Sukhoi SH kval 1A tailsitter fighter project of 1963.
 

Attachments

  • shk.jpg
    shk.jpg
    120.9 KB · Views: 1,808

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
27,302
Reaction score
4,065
Hi,

Anther drawing to Sukhoi SH Kval tailsitter fighter.
 

Attachments

  • Sukhoi tailsitter aircraft.jpg
    Sukhoi tailsitter aircraft.jpg
    198.3 KB · Views: 1,825

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
12,657
Reaction score
4,245
New Topic for this.

Some pictures from article here:

http://www.be-and-co.com/ako_pdf/ako020340.pdf
 

Attachments

  • shkval-1.jpg
    shkval-1.jpg
    37.9 KB · Views: 1,371
  • shkval-2.jpg
    shkval-2.jpg
    31.3 KB · Views: 1,338
  • shkval-3.jpg
    shkval-3.jpg
    43.5 KB · Views: 1,295

Rickshaw

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
2,042
Reaction score
126
Several questions spring to mind. How did it land? Vertically or horizontally? How was it erected, if it landed horizontally?
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,105
Reaction score
1,083
Vertically, both.
 

Jemiba

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
8,269
Reaction score
1,111
"How was it erected, if it landed horizontally?"

This was a problem, I think, that may have doomed the use of the tailsitter
concept. For this Sukhoi design, or for most other tailsitters like the Convair
XFY-1 Pogo, the Lockheed XFV-1 , or the SNECMA Coleopter, a "conventional"
landing would have meant, that there would have been no need for further thoughts
about erecting the aircraft to take-off attitude again .. :(
To bring home the aircraft with a faulty engine, developing much less thrust than normal,
would have been nearly impossible.
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
27,302
Reaction score
4,065
My dear Overscan;

the translation;
http://www.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vtol.boom.ru%2Frus%2Fshkval%2Findex.html&hl=ar&ie=UTF-8&sl=ru&tl=en
 

dreamstar

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
Oct 24, 2007
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
In doing a re-read of Soviet Secret Projects: Fighters since 1945, I read the segment on the Shkval tail-sitter and its origination came from a 'private organisation' within the Sukhoi OKB led by R G Martirosov to deal with "aircraft of an unorthodox and less conventional layout." I was wondering if there was any information on other creations from this Sukhoi 'Skunk Works?'
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
27,302
Reaction score
4,065
Hi Dreamstar,


please see;
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,5099.msg40496.html#msg40496
 

Stargazer2006

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
13,227
Reaction score
534
Two modern artist's views found on the web:
 

Attachments

  • Sukhoi SHK_sc2.jpg
    Sukhoi SHK_sc2.jpg
    62.6 KB · Views: 287
  • Sukhoi SHK_sc1.jpg
    Sukhoi SHK_sc1.jpg
    122.7 KB · Views: 277

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,105
Reaction score
1,083
dreamstar said:
In doing a re-read of Soviet Secret Projects: Fighters since 1945, I read the segment on the Shkval tail-sitter and its origination came from a 'private organisation'
within the Sukhoi OKB led by R G Martirosov to deal with "aircraft of an unorthodox and less conventional layout."
I was wondering if there was any information on other creations from this Sukhoi 'Skunk Works?'
You got it rather wrong. It was an initiative group of designers, that gathered as volunteer group, working at projects at free hours after work or weekends (like it was with Ivashechkin's&Co. SPB - a far predecessor of Su-25 - later).
There was never a special, 'elite' ADP department at Sukhoi.
 

airrocket

Dreams To Reality
Joined
Mar 3, 2008
Messages
290
Reaction score
7
Website
RetroFlight.com
. I have seen drawings of what appears to be a MIG-25 or 31 without wings having four fins launching vertically. Any additional information of this MIG variant?
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,105
Reaction score
1,083
www.p-ln.ru/rus/shkval/index.html
 

Attachments

  • ako020340.pdf
    99.6 KB · Views: 124

chuck4

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 17, 2011
Messages
803
Reaction score
6
I am kinda curious about the X wings. It seems to me an X-winged aircraft should be able to aerodynamically sustain more or less the same G force in any direction, pitch, yaw, or any combination.


Has anyone ever done any studies to see how pilots can handle 9G yaw?


It seems to me it to be a great advantage in a close dog fight if the fighter can instantly pull high G in any direction, and not have to roll the aircraft first to achieve the correct bank.
 

Sundog

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
2,861
Reaction score
320
chuck4 said:
I am kinda curious about the X wings. It seems to me an X-winged aircraft should be able to aerodynamically sustain more or less the same G force in any direction, pitch, yaw, or any combination.


Has anyone ever done any studies to see how pilots can handle 9G yaw?


It seems to me it to be a great advantage in a close dog fight if the fighter can instantly pull high G in any direction, and not have to roll the aircraft first to achieve the correct bank.

It would unnecessarily add weight and the only time you want to yaw is for quick nose pointing for a snap shot. If you need a 9G yaw snapshot you've designed a horrendously poor aircraft. 9G yawing is what missiles are for, not aircraft. Also, if you want to be able to maneuver at high loads in any direction, that will be handled in the future by A2A UCAV's.

Trying to design a cockpit and a seat that could handle sustained 9G side loads on a pilot would be very limiting to the pilot. How do you move your arms on the flight controls if you are being pressed sideways by 9G's on one arm or the other? And if the side load was carried by the human body under his arms, I wouldn't be surprised if the pilot ended up with some fractured ribs, as the pilots body load is going to be distributed over much less area than a conventional seating configuration during normal orthogonal loading wrt to the velocity vector. It's simply a non-starter from the get go.
 

famvburg

I really should change my personal text
Joined
Jul 24, 2011
Messages
342
Reaction score
12
Stumbled upon this thread looking for info on the Shkval. Sharkit offers a kit he calls Shkval 2, based on the MiG-25. http://sharkit.com/sharkit/Shkval2/Shkval2.htm
 

Stargazer2006

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
13,227
Reaction score
534
athpilot said:
Hm Shkval-2 ... seems to be a fake. :-\

My feeling exactly. I don't think it's good for the image of Sharkit to mix fake and real designs without a word of warning.
 

Vladimir

I really should change my personal text
Joined
Sep 22, 2015
Messages
321
Reaction score
15
Hi, more drowings
Shkval-2? -dont know but at least two modifications of Shkval was designed!
 

Attachments

  • 1348309394_12.jpg
    1348309394_12.jpg
    30.5 KB · Views: 513
  • 1348309377_11.jpg
    1348309377_11.jpg
    80.1 KB · Views: 505
  • shkval.jpg
    shkval.jpg
    75.8 KB · Views: 420
  • Screenshot_shkval.jpg
    Screenshot_shkval.jpg
    266.7 KB · Views: 321

Vladimir

I really should change my personal text
Joined
Sep 22, 2015
Messages
321
Reaction score
15
Good video by David Myhra here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PEHbWYNVxv8
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
27,302
Reaction score
4,065
From Air Pictorial 9/1957,

here is an Info about Russian vertical takeoff aircraft similar to X-13,had been tested and
that means it had tailsitter shape,so I excluded Rafaelyants Turbolyot,and for Sikhoi Shkval,
it was from 1963,what was it ?.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    98.8 KB · Views: 153

Similar threads

Top