Stout's post-Ford-era projects

Stargazer

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
25 June 2009
Messages
13,620
Reaction score
2,632
The name William Bushnell ("Bill") Stout is most often associated with Ford, but in fact the Stout Metal Airplane Co. was started in 1922, prior to Ford's involvement, producing the ST-1 Torpedo for the U. S. Navy (which already has a topic) and the Model 1-AS Air Sedan, with George Prudden as chief engineer/co-designer (earlier projects and prototypes are covered in yet another separate topic).

When the ST-1 contract folded, however, Stout, facing bankruptcy, solicited financial support. This came from a group of Detroit area businessmen including auto manufacturers Roy Chapin (Hudson), Walter Chrysler, Barney Everitt (Rickenbacker), Fred Fisher (Fisher Body), Henry Ford (via Edsel Ford), Charles F. Kettering (GMC), Alvin McCauley (Packard), and Ransom E. Olds (Reo). In 1924, Henry Ford became the major backer in Stout's operations, and within a year, the Stout Metal Airplane Co. had become a division of Ford Motor Co.

A fateful fire destroyed several Models 2-AT and the sole 3-AT. Ford sent Stout on a nationwide tour to promote the company's aviation activity (and presumably reassure financial backers); but with Stout away, Ford elected to assign Tom Towle and Otto Koppen to the design of a replacement airliner as quickly as possible. When Stout returned, the project was already well on its way, and became the Wright-powered Model 4-AT and Wasp-powered 5-AT Trimotors, in which Stout had no involvement (despite the fact it is often associated with him).

By 1929, Stout had virtually no involvement left in the company which he had created but that had gradually slipped from his hands. Even the Stout Air Lines name had been replaced, and all aircraft now sported the name Ford. As of 1929, Stout revived his Stout Engineering Laboratories and started looking for new outlets for his creative juices. He collaborated with the Wichita, Kansas-based Buckley Aircraft Co., designing two all-metal aircraft for them, the two-seat FC-1 in 1929, and the four-seat LC-4 Wichcraft (no "t") in 1930, the latter obtaning a contract with Yellow Air Cab Co. for 200 planes, though in the end only one was built (this was sold to Northrop and allegedly scrapped).
 

Attachments

  • Buckley FC-1.jpg
    Buckley FC-1.jpg
    7.9 KB · Views: 622
  • 2014051068.JPG
    2014051068.JPG
    79.6 KB · Views: 633
By 1931, Stout was left to his own devices again and started working in many directions: cars, trains, minivans (a concept he practically invented), all with various degrees of success. It seems that only the aircraft side of things didn't work out so well. In 1931 he explored two different types of concepts: one was the Skycar (or Sky Car, depending on source documents), which he meant as just that, the family car of the air. He studied several configurations for that: single tail boom, twin-boom tails on high or low-wing monoplanes. Eventually he produced a single prototype of his high-wing Model 11 Sky Car, initially with twin-booms, but this was quickly changed to a single tail connected to the pod-like cabin by an uncovered framework, in the manner of the primary glider types that had become so popular over the past two years. The Sky Car came at a wrong time and was not the resounding success Stout probably hoped it would be.
 

Attachments

  • Skycar art (Popular Aviation cover, June 1931).jpg
    Skycar art (Popular Aviation cover, June 1931).jpg
    66 KB · Views: 131
  • po1931_air_car_I_04.jpg
    po1931_air_car_I_04.jpg
    7.1 KB · Views: 106
  • po1931_air_car_I_03.jpg
    po1931_air_car_I_03.jpg
    10.9 KB · Views: 98
  • po1931_air_car_I_02.jpg
    po1931_air_car_I_02.jpg
    24.6 KB · Views: 97
  • po1931_air_car_I_01.jpg
    po1931_air_car_I_01.jpg
    36.8 KB · Views: 97
  • Skycar I.jpg
    Skycar I.jpg
    37.8 KB · Views: 94
  • Photo5 Stout Skycar I twin-boom (small).jpg
    Photo5 Stout Skycar I twin-boom (small).jpg
    368 KB · Views: 92
  • 19520110000a.JPG
    19520110000a.JPG
    164.7 KB · Views: 547
  • 1948149140.JPG
    1948149140.JPG
    38.9 KB · Views: 567
  • 2014051004.JPG
    2014051004.JPG
    43.2 KB · Views: 586
The other direction which Stout pursued was, unsurprisingly, the airliner. Ever since his 1920 "Batwing Limousine" he had strived to produce the ideal all-metal airliner, safe, sturdy and aerodynamic. In 1931, two designs emerged: the seven-passenger Safety Plane and the larger Air Transport, both with similar configurations as single tail twin-engine pushers. A patent was obtained in 1934 for this configuration. Of course none of these was built.

Much more ambitious were two large transport designs which Stout filed for patent in 1930 (both granted in 1932). Both were high wing all-metal double-deckers, the first an airliner with a set of four engines on top of each wing, aligned on pylons one behind the other; the second an airliner/cargo type with very thick wing and unspecified propulsion means (the patent applying more to the structure of the fuselage and its "beam-like keel structure for taking impact forces" rather than the general configuration).
 

Attachments

  • US1859807 (small).gif
    US1859807 (small).gif
    71.4 KB · Views: 129
  • US1842055 (small).gif
    US1842055 (small).gif
    41.2 KB · Views: 143
  • oo1931_stout_air_transport.jpg
    oo1931_stout_air_transport.jpg
    12.9 KB · Views: 136
  • US1980233 (small).pdf.gif
    US1980233 (small).pdf.gif
    76.3 KB · Views: 110
  • 1948149118.JPG
    1948149118.JPG
    40.5 KB · Views: 123
  • 1948149121.JPG
    1948149121.JPG
    39.3 KB · Views: 124
  • 1948149012a.JPG
    1948149012a.JPG
    39.2 KB · Views: 114
  • 1948149012.JPG
    1948149012.JPG
    42.9 KB · Views: 100
The Sky Car however remained at the heart of Stout's aviation concerns. Here is a series of Sky Car/Skycar designs, that weren't built:
  • a circa 1930 low-wing twin-boom pusher
  • a November 1931 high-wing twin-boom pusher
  • a 1939 high-wing twin-boom pusher
  • the 1942 Sky Car Model 3 (possibly the Skycar III that would have been the XC-107?)
  • the 1942 Model V twin-engine pusher (reminiscent of the Safety Plane, also called a "Skycar" in some documents)
  • a 1944 twin-boom pusher design patent
 

Attachments

  • USD139028 (part, small).gif
    USD139028 (part, small).gif
    68.2 KB · Views: 104
  • 1948149143.JPG
    1948149143.JPG
    35.3 KB · Views: 97
  • 1948149138.JPG
    1948149138.JPG
    34.4 KB · Views: 96
  • 1948149145.JPG
    1948149145.JPG
    37.6 KB · Views: 95
  • 1948149126.JPG
    1948149126.JPG
    50.7 KB · Views: 99
  • 1948149131.JPG
    1948149131.JPG
    35.8 KB · Views: 101
Eventually, only one prototype called the Sky Car II, looking like the design patent, was built. Registered [NX22446], it was a two-seat high-wing cabin monoplane with 90hp Franklin O-200 pusher engine. It was transfered to the U. S. Army Air Forces for testing as XC-65 [42-7772], in order to serve as prototype for a larger military transport, the XC-107; however, when the sole XC-65 was destroyed in a hangar fire, the contract was cancelled.
 

Attachments

  • william_b_stout.jpg
    william_b_stout.jpg
    15.9 KB · Views: 85
  • XC-65 from 1946 USAAF document.jpg
    XC-65 from 1946 USAAF document.jpg
    136.7 KB · Views: 82
  • stout-3vu.jpg
    stout-3vu.jpg
    74.7 KB · Views: 91
  • Skycar II (from 'Michigan Aircraft Manufacturers').jpg
    Skycar II (from 'Michigan Aircraft Manufacturers').jpg
    152.9 KB · Views: 84
  • Photo4 Stout Skycar II (XC-65) rear.jpg
    Photo4 Stout Skycar II (XC-65) rear.jpg
    32.7 KB · Views: 80
  • Photo2 Stout Skycar II (XC-65) front-left.jpg
    Photo2 Stout Skycar II (XC-65) front-left.jpg
    12.1 KB · Views: 85
  • IMG_7259_e2a (XC-65).jpg
    IMG_7259_e2a (XC-65).jpg
    96.2 KB · Views: 91
  • from The Rotarian, January 1945.jpg
    from The Rotarian, January 1945.jpg
    313.2 KB · Views: 93
There must be a lot of Stout designs that have never been identified and were lost to history. Fortunately, some neat stuff remains thanks to the Detroit Historical Society, which possesses many beautiful documents spanning all of Stout's aviation career.

Among these other projects, two more large transports for 1941:
  • a 1941 three-engine partly-trailerable airplane
  • the 1941 Stout Bimotor Transport, a clean twin-engine tractor design with twin tails and corrugated fuselage.

Other designs include two types meant for the post-war market:
  • the 1943 Aerocar, a Skycar-like twin-boom pusher whose wing and tail could be detached from the pod-like roadable fuselage for transport.
  • the Helicab, a 1943 cabin helicopter of very streamlined design

Interestingly, a similar helicopter was patented in 1944, and registration [NX1268] assigned that same year to a "CVAC Stout Research Division Model 6" helicopter, of which nothing is known. Most likely this must have been a prototype for this design, which presumably was never completed.
 

Attachments

  • USD139432 (small).gif
    USD139432 (small).gif
    61.6 KB · Views: 95
  • convair-stout-helicab.gif
    convair-stout-helicab.gif
    125 KB · Views: 88
  • AeroSPOT-a.JPG
    AeroSPOT-a.JPG
    68.3 KB · Views: 76
  • convair-stout-aerocar.gif
    convair-stout-aerocar.gif
    268.5 KB · Views: 107
  • 1948149133.JPG
    1948149133.JPG
    57.4 KB · Views: 122
  • 1948149134.JPG
    1948149134.JPG
    44.8 KB · Views: 104
  • oo1941_stout_cargoplane_1.jpg
    oo1941_stout_cargoplane_1.jpg
    12.6 KB · Views: 90
The Stout Skycraft Corp., which Stout had started in 1941 in the hope of producing the Skycar II and other designs, had become the Stout Research Division of Consolidated-Vultee Aircraft Corp. in 1943. Most sources state that the "CVAC Stout Research Division Model 8" or Sky Car IV was the same as the Convair 103. This is not substantiated by the civil register's entries (see last attachment below) or even photos.

The first picture below shows Bill Stout and George Spratt with the still incomplete Sky Car IV, obviously a different, much less refined machine with crude tail. According to civil registers, this machine got the registration [NX22447] in 1944, at the very same time as a separate aircraft designated the Consolidated-Vultee Model 103 [NX22448]. The fact that these two aircraft were registered together with sequential numbers is proof that the two machines were not the same one modified, but indeed two separate prototypes. The Model 103 Skycar was a more refined design, and I wouldn't be surprised if the former had never been completed and only the second one flown instead.

The last of the Sky Cars was a very different animal indeed. First of all, it was not a Stout design, but used the "Controlwing" floating wing (or living wing) principle developed by George A. Spratt and his son George G. Spratt since the 1910s. This was only one of the many Controlwing prototypes developed over the years, but certainly the best-known because of Consolidated-Vultee's involvement. The Controlwing and the Spratt designs deserve a topic of their own, and since I've done quite a bit of research into the matter, I will start one soon.

Final and little-known fact about the Model 103: it was completely rebuilt circa 1945 with new tail, as can be seen in the eighth attachment below. The reason for this reconstruction is not clear. Was the prototype damaged? Did its disappointing performance lead to a redesign? I promise I'll dig further into this subject for the Spratt topic...
 

Attachments

  • NX 22447 mention (American Aviation, 1944).jpg
    NX 22447 mention (American Aviation, 1944).jpg
    41.5 KB · Views: 92
  • after rebuilding.jpg
    after rebuilding.jpg
    140.5 KB · Views: 85
  • Flying, May 1946 p.112.jpg
    Flying, May 1946 p.112.jpg
    379.5 KB · Views: 74
  • Flying, May 1946 p.44.jpg
    Flying, May 1946 p.44.jpg
    275.3 KB · Views: 76
  • Flying, May 1946 p.43.jpg
    Flying, May 1946 p.43.jpg
    194.9 KB · Views: 87
  • Flying, May 1946 p.42.jpg
    Flying, May 1946 p.42.jpg
    210.6 KB · Views: 88
  • 4588637278_d637c1bd2c_o.jpg
    4588637278_d637c1bd2c_o.jpg
    93.9 KB · Views: 95
  • 4588015221_5fe40afb60_o.jpg
    4588015221_5fe40afb60_o.jpg
    78.2 KB · Views: 96
  • 4588015195_1eea7a2211_o.jpg
    4588015195_1eea7a2211_o.jpg
    129.2 KB · Views: 89
Thanks Steve Pace, lark and hesham. Glad you enjoyed these! I certainly did.
 
My dear Skyblazer,

here is a Stout Helicopter,in artist drawing form.

http://archive.aviationweek.com/image/spread/19430802/12/2
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    194.5 KB · Views: 105
Hi,

http://www.coachbuilt.com/des/s/stout/stout.htm
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    114.3 KB · Views: 107
Just realized I omitted a Stout type that was actually built, appearing only on registers as the Stout glider [490M], whose construction number — SX-9 — echoed Stout's earliest known prototype of 1918, the SX-6, perhaps indicating a personal sequence of Stout Engineering experimental types. I have never seen any picture of this machine and do not know what it might have looked like.
 
cluttonfred said:
Great stuff, that could easily make a publishable article.

I would love to do that; I just don't hang around the adequate circles to get started! :'(
 
Go to The Aviation Historian website and use the contact e-mail address there, give a precis of your idea and a link to this forum thread. I think this could be exactly the kind of material they are seeking.
 
Thanks a lot cluttonfred and Schneiderman for the vote of confidence and the tip! :)
 
Schneiderman said:
Go to The Aviation Historian website and use the contact e-mail address there, give a precis of your idea and a link to this forum thread. I think this could be exactly the kind of material they are seeking.

That's a great suggestion but you would need to secure the rights to photos to be used. You might reach out the the guys at 1000aircraftphotos.com to see if they have anything you could use.
 
Much of Skyblazer's posted material comes from the Detroit Historical Society, so his first contact should be to them.
 
Schneiderman said:
Much of Skyblazer's posted material comes from the Detroit Historical Society, so his first contact should be to them.

Exactly. ;)
 
The name William Bushnell ("Bill") Stout is most often associated with Ford, but in fact the Stout Metal Airplane Co. was started in 1922, prior to Ford's involvement, producing the ST-1 Torpedo for the U. S. Navy (which already has a topic) and the Model 1-AS Air Sedan, with George Prudden as chief engineer/co-designer (earlier projects and prototypes are covered in yet another separate topic).

When the ST-1 contract folded, however, Stout, facing bankruptcy, solicited financial support. This came from a group of Detroit area businessmen including auto manufacturers Roy Chapin (Hudson), Walter Chrysler, Barney Everitt (Rickenbacker), Fred Fisher (Fisher Body), Henry Ford (via Edsel Ford), Charles F. Kettering (GMC), Alvin McCauley (Packard), and Ransom E. Olds (Reo). In 1924, Henry Ford became the major backer in Stout's operations, and within a year, the Stout Metal Airplane Co. had become a division of Ford Motor Co.

A fateful fire destroyed several Models 2-AT and the sole 3-AT. Ford sent Stout on a nationwide tour to promote the company's aviation activity (and presumably reassure financial backers); but with Stout away, Ford elected to assign Tom Towle and Otto Koppen to the design of a replacement airliner as quickly as possible. When Stout returned, the project was already well on its way, and became the Wright-powered Model 4-AT and Wasp-powered 5-AT Trimotors, in which Stout had no involvement (despite the fact it is often associated with him).

By 1929, Stout had virtually no involvement left in the company which he had created but that had gradually slipped from his hands. Even the Stout Air Lines name had been replaced, and all aircraft now sported the name Ford. As of 1929, Stout revived his Stout Engineering Laboratories and started looking for new outlets for his creative juices. He collaborated with the Wichita, Kansas-based Buckley Aircraft Co., designing two all-metal aircraft for them, the two-seat FC-1 in 1929, and the four-seat LC-4 Wichcraft (no "t") in 1930, the latter obtaning a contract with Yellow Air Cab Co. for 200 planes, though in the end only one was built (this was sold to Northrop and allegedly scrapped).
It is incorrect to say that Stout had nothing to do with the 4AT. The 4AT borrowed heavily from the 3AT. It was built in Stout’s workshop by the men he had hired, with the machines and building methods that Stout had created. Bill was not gone long enough for a full redesign. There is no doubt that Tom Towel and the room full of bright Ford engineers made many calculations that contributed to the final designs. Stout was an old school engineer that relied heavily on trial and error. The problem was that Henry Ford had shot his mouth off to the press and it became urgent for him to produce a plane. The idea of an all metal trimotor was inarguably Stout’s. The money for the project was raised by Stout. Stout designed the first airport for Ford. Henry Ford was ruthless when it came to firing employees who he saw as underperforming, yet he never fired Bill. In fact, he gave Bill free rein to work on his own projects. Henry and Edsel and Bill remained friends for decades. Stout created the first regularly scheduled airline. It was his idea to put the pilots and stewards in uniforms. Most of what we now consider to be standard procedure for airlines was invented by Stout. I could go on and on. The bottom line is that aviation historians love drama and Tom Towel was able to give his version of history after Bill Stout had been long buried and could not defend himself.
 
Welcome aboard Stoutstuff,

do you have a more Projects for Stout ?.
 
From Aero Digest 1940.
 

Attachments

  • 32.png
    32.png
    338.9 KB · Views: 16
  • 33.png
    33.png
    816.2 KB · Views: 19
By 1931, Stout was left to his own devices again and started working in many directions: cars, trains, minivans (a concept he practically invented), all with various degrees of success. It seems that only the aircraft side of things didn't work out so well. In 1931 he explored two different types of concepts: one was the Skycar (or Sky Car, depending on source documents), which he meant as just that, the family car of the air. He studied several configurations for that: single tail boom, twin-boom tails on high or low-wing monoplanes. Eventually he produced a single prototype of his high-wing Model 11 Sky Car, initially with twin-booms, but this was quickly changed to a single tail connected to the pod-like cabin by an uncovered framework, in the manner of the primary glider types that had become so popular over the past two years. The Sky Car came at a wrong time and was not the resounding success Stout probably hoped it would be.
That forest of struts would discourage passengers from wandering into the spinning propeller.
 
That forest of struts would discourage passengers from wandering into the spinning propeller.
I shall refrain form making the obvious MIL jokes, but, I shall still think them. Muahahahahaha.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom