St. Louis Aircraft Prototypes and Projects

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
26 May 2006
Messages
32,505
Reaction score
11,590
Hi,

a well known company,the St. Louis Aircraft Division,it designed and built the
PT-35,a tandem two-seat trainer biplane of 1936,a rare picture to it in Flying
magazine,lost a competition for US Army Air Corps against Stearman Aircraft
Corporation.

A patent for unusual airplane was for dual wing surfaces were provided in this
construction,one forwardly and one rearwardly of the pilot seat.

I heard this company had anther project,but no more details are known.

https://books.google.com.eg/books?id=qca6PvHpQ34C&pg=PA324&lpg=PA324&dq=St.+Louis+PT-35+AIRPLANE&source=bl&ots=aYJijsdSFQ&sig=Df3nBvMr0bxCbPS-3L-MrMvVuN8&hl=ar&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjinODbzK7LAhWGORoKHQf6BjwQ6AEINTAE#v=onepage&q=St.%20Louis%20PT-35%20AIRPLANE&f=false

Page 123; https://books.google.com.eg/books?id=rFmpUR9iLmAC&printsec=frontcover&hl=ar&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
 

Attachments

  • PT-35.png
    PT-35.png
    542.6 KB · Views: 545
  • PT-35  II.png
    PT-35 II.png
    459.8 KB · Views: 482
More on the St. Louis trainer and the decidedly unfortunate company that produced it:

During World War I, the St. Louis Car Co. from St. Louis, Missouri, proposed to manufacture as many as 5,000 modified Benoist Type XV boats for the British, for use as antisubmarine patrol aircraft. However the British were already committed to the earlier, more thoroughly tested Curtiss flying boats, and the deal fell through.

A merger was attempted with Benoist in 1915 but was eventually unresolved.

The St. Louis Aircraft Division of the St Louis Car Company was founded in 1917 with the task of producing JN-4 trainers for the U.S. armed forces as a subcontractor to Curtiss.

After the war, the division remained dormant. It probably tried to obtain contracts, but apparently only produced the suspended engine-equipped crew car of the Army's C-6 motorized observation balloon.

With the late 1920s boom on commercial aircraft, it was reorganized as the St. Louis Aircraft Co. and produced the C2 Cardinal series of high-cabin monoplanes, a little over 20 of which were produced in 1929-1930 in seven different variants. It was a neat type that could have met with a lot more success, but the economic crisis fell hard on many aviation companies.

After a lapse of five years, the single XPT-35 (or PT-35, depending on sources) was produced in 1935 (hence its designation) with the hope of winning an Army contract for a biplane primary trainer to be produced in quantity (eventually this was achieved by the Stearman/Boeing Kaydet series).

Only one aircraft was built, receiving registration [11778] (c/n 35-101). Powered by a 225hp Wright R-760 engine, it crashed at Wright Field in 1936 during testing. The design, however, was promising enough to justify the order of a replacement prototype. Unfortunately, this machine, the PT-1W, temporarily registered [NX18068] and assigned Army serial 39-703 (c/n 101) came a little too late. By the time the aircraft, now designated as XPT-15, was flown in 1940, the Army Air Corps had been enthused over the Boeing 73 demonstrator (evaluated at Wright Field as the XPT-945), and orders of the type were already rolling.

The PT-1W design was sound, the prototype performed well, and so the Army ordered a batch of 13 pre-production aircraft under the designation YPT-15, with serials 40-1 to 40-13 (presumably c/n 1 to 13), delivered in 1941. Unfortunately for the St. Louis company, full production status was never achieved because the Stearmans were wholly satisfactory.

St. Louis didn't give up on its high hopes of becoming a major Army contractor, and came up in 1940 with a new trainer, this time a low-wing tandem-cockpit monoplane designated the PT-LM-4 [NX25500] (c/n 14), powered by a 180hp Ranger 6 engine. Although this was meant for military evaluation, once again it didn't attract any orders, this time because of another serious competitor, the Fairchild M-62, which won the contract and was produced as the PT-19/PT-23 Cornell series. Ironically, St. Louis DID receive a fairly large contract for Army trainers, but as a subcontractor on the very aircraft that had beaten their design, the Ranger-powered PT-19A and the Continental-powered PT-23 and -23A, producing a total of 350 of all three versions.

The company lost all hopes of ever making it in the aircraft business after the drastic failure of their cargo glider designs, the eight-seat, gull-wing XCG-5 and fifteen-seat XCG-6. Only an static test model was built of the former [41-29619]. All ground testing demonstrated the failure of the design, resulting in immediate cancellation of the larger model.
 

Attachments

  • AAHS 522100_St. Louis eight-seat XCG-5.jpg
    AAHS 522100_St. Louis eight-seat XCG-5.jpg
    18.9 KB · Views: 73
  • stlouis-PTLM4.jpg
    stlouis-PTLM4.jpg
    12.8 KB · Views: 69
  • Saint-Louis YPT_15.jpg
    Saint-Louis YPT_15.jpg
    22.9 KB · Views: 251
  • IMG_7247_e2a.jpg
    IMG_7247_e2a.jpg
    74.2 KB · Views: 324
  • [NC951B].jpg
    [NC951B].jpg
    601.7 KB · Views: 344
Here is an ad published in the April 6, 1929 issue of Aviation, announcing the launch of the Cardinal:
 

Attachments

  • AW 1929-04-06_p.1042 (St. Louis).jpg
    AW 1929-04-06_p.1042 (St. Louis).jpg
    188.1 KB · Views: 48
Here is a drawing of the XCG-6 taken from W. Norton's book American Military Gliders of WWII as well asa another two pics of the XCG-5 from the National Soaring Museum.
By the way, a minor correction to Starblazer's post of 24 May 2016: XPT-15 was serialled as 39-703. 39-702 was the Waco XT-14. Also, the XPT-15 was written off on 27 June 1939 at Springfield, OH.
 

Attachments

  • CG-06.jpg
    CG-06.jpg
    43.1 KB · Views: 49
  • CG-05.jpg
    CG-05.jpg
    620.5 KB · Views: 57
  • CG-05 (2).jpg
    CG-05 (2).jpg
    256.4 KB · Views: 67
Jos Heyman said:
Here is a drawing of the XCG-6 taken from W. Norton's book American Military Gliders of WWII as well asa another two pics of the XCG-5 from the National Soaring Museum.

Splendid photos, thanks!

Jos Heyman said:
By the way, a minor correction to Starblazer's post of 24 May 2016: XPT-15 was serialled as 39-703. 39-702 was the Waco XT-14. Also, the XPT-15 was written off on 27 June 1939 at Springfield, OH.

Oops. I'll correct this right away. And yes, you meant Waco XPT-14, not XT-14. (Un)fortunately we're all prone to typos! Doesn't make me feel quite so bad! ;D ;D ;D ;)
 
Very cool,thanks you my dears Skyblazer and Jos.
 
hesham said:
A patent for unusual airplane was for dual wing surfaces were provided in this
construction,one forwardly and one rearwardly of the pilot seat.

Page 123; https://books.google.com.eg/books?id=rFmpUR9iLmAC&printsec=frontcover&hl=ar&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

I forgot to send the drawing.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    31 KB · Views: 45
Hi,

here is a drawing for PT-LM-4 airplane.

http://www.avia-it.com/act/biblioteca/periodici/PDF%20Riviste/Ala%20d'Italia/L'ALA%20D'ITALIA%201942%2005.pdf
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    526.9 KB · Views: 47
hesham said:
A patent for unusual airplane was for dual wing surfaces were provided in this
construction,one forwardly and one rearwardly of the pilot seat.

Page 123; https://books.google.com.eg/books?i...ce=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

I forgot to send the drawing.
If you follow the thread, you'll find that this design had nothing to do with the St. Louis Aircraft Corp. The patent was issued to a C. St. Louis of Fresno, CA

Maybe move to Patent Pending section?

US Patent link: https://image-ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/1685888
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom