Specification O.27/34

smurf

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
549
Reaction score
50
This is the spec for the Blackburn Skua. In his book Skua!, Peter Smith says:
O.27/34 was restricted to three firms only. Hawker and Fairey were considered most suitable, with Armstrong [-Whitworth?], Blackburn, Bristol, Gloster, Vickers and Westland in the second group. Other commitments whittled these down to Blackburn, Hawker and Vickers, although Armstrong which had already submitted similar proposals for a fighter/dive-bomber with the Hyena power plant, were permitted to have their design evaluated in the same tests. In the event the short list included designs from just Avro and Vickers Development.
[as well as Blackburn, presumably]
Has anyone any information and ideally drawings of any of the proposals by Avro, Vickers and particularly Armstrong, please?
 

lark

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
1,812
Reaction score
115
Blackburn B-24 became Skua
Avro type 666 layout October 1934.A mock-up may have been built.
Vickers type 280 midwing monoplane.Mock up produced.It was comparable with the Ju-87.
Hawker and Boulton Paul tendered project designs but no details are available.

source : The British Aircraft Specification File :K J Meekcoms and E B Morgan-Air Britain Publication.
 

smurf

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
549
Reaction score
50
Thanks, Lark. Maybe with type numbers more details can be found.
The A-W design would not be in that ref, as it was not submitted to that spec.
 

PMN1

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
886
Reaction score
418
Has anyone been able to find anything on this?
 

Stargazer2006

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
13,225
Reaction score
807
My list of tenders for this specification, so far:

- Avro Type 666
- Blackburn B-24 Skua
- Boulton Paul design
- Fairey design
- Hawker design
- Vickers Type 280
 

royabulgaf

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
543
Reaction score
137
How closely were the design bureaus at Vickers and Supermarine tied together? You mentioned the Vickers 666 looked like a Stuka. I immediately thought of something along the lines of the Supermarine 224.
 

Schneiderman

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
1,592
Reaction score
909
Vickers and Supermarine design departments operated largely independently but there was a joint strategy committee in place to exchange ideas and coordinate activity; comprised of McLean, Bird, Mitchell, Pierson and Wallis

The Vickers Type 280 is shown in the Vickers Putnam volume. Fixed undercarriage and originally to be powered by either a Goshawk or Griffon (no not that one, the Buzzard MS), later a Merlin. The selection of an elliptical wing is interesting, and indeed more Vickers projects than Supermarine incorporated such a wing through the late 1930s, make of that what you will.
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
28,367
Reaction score
6,023
Hi,


here is a drawings to Vickers Type 280 and Avro Type 666.
 

Attachments

  • Vickers.png
    Vickers.png
    138.8 KB · Views: 391
  • 280.png
    280.png
    93.4 KB · Views: 395
  • 666.png
    666.png
    149.6 KB · Views: 375

avion ancien

The accidental peasant!
Joined
Mar 6, 2013
Messages
304
Reaction score
120
Just an aside, but it must have been very brave on the part of Avro's design bureau to utilise the type number 666!
 

VictorXL188

Former Aviation journalist/writer
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2013
Messages
387
Reaction score
713
Further to this, I have come across reference to serial numbers being allocated to both the Vickers Type 280 and also the Avro Type 666. The Type 666 was given K5117, whilst the Type 280, which was listed as merely the Vickers O.27/34 was K5177. The first two Skua prototypes were K5178 & K5179. Source was http://www.ukserials.com/serials-older-0k.htm
 

Similar threads

Top