- Joined
- 13 August 2007
- Messages
- 9,840
- Reaction score
- 16,327
Grow up. This isn't a gaming forum.I had no idea NASA had two Primarchs
Cooling will be no less a problem in space. If anything it's harder in a way because you don't have "free" air available to carry away the heat and you have to do everything radiatively. The radiation environment is tougher too. But, maybe there could still be advantages against fixed site datacenters and all the electrical, utility, and real estate stuff that goes along with them.Great idea to bypass the cooling
Not really. Just as solar arrays rotate to track the sun, radiators can be kept on edge to the sun or shaded.Cooling will be no less a problem in space. If anything it's harder in a way because you don't have "free" air available to carry away the heat and you have to do everything radiatively. The radiation environment is tougher too. But, maybe there could still be advantages against fixed site datacenters and all the electrical, utility, and real estate stuff that goes along with them.
The thumbnail for that video. . .just stumbled onto this from four years ago:
This is not directed to any individual poster, but going forward I would kindly request for *ANYONE* posting video on this forum to also submit a short, crisp, succinct, to the point, one paragraph text describing the information content of that video. At my age of 64, I simply don't have the patience to sit through droning videos of Cincinnati Time Waste watching paint dry just to wait for any non breathtaking minuscule reveal.Current state of Gigabay at Starbase
![]()
That is sad to see.Viewer discretion is advised
![]()
![]()
yes more insane is those falcon's have landed and were reused !A literal sea of falcon 9s,insane
That wouldn't get anywhere. Still need the Starship. and Musk would rather tear down all of Starbase before using SRBsThat is sad to see.
For storytelling’s sake, the last launch should have been the rock tornado—a one-off SuperHeavy 2.0 surrounded by remaining SRBs that just blasts the pad away to lob a one-piece reactor (minus fuel) into orbit.
Those plates at 7 o'clock got torched on the last flight.That is sad to see.
For storytelling’s sake, the last launch should have been the rock tornado—a one-off SuperHeavy 2.0 surrounded by remaining SRBs that just blasts the pad away to lob a one-piece reactor (minus fuel) into orbit.
It actually hurts me to see anything cut up like that in such an anti-climactic manner.
The closest thing to an Orion pusher-plate any of us will ever see.
Starship could deliver 100GW/year to high Earth orbit within 4 to 5 years if we can solve the other parts of the equation.
100TW/year is possible from a lunar base producing solar-powered AI satellites locally and
accelerating them to escape velocity with a mass driver.
Have you ever read SP-413?
SLS is there on page 58. Better than SLS actually. In a half-century old publication.No, I haven't. But certainly think similar that included the rail launcher.
Thank you for sharing. Looks to be an exquisite piece.