Ainen
I really should change my personal text
- Joined
- 25 August 2011
- Messages
- 2,823
- Reaction score
- 4,928
In this case the answer will be no. Chinese aircraft community tend to iterate chinese fighters upwards every cycle some voice thinks of something.I think the OP’s point is that the J-16 is simply much more thoroughly developed for modern A2A combat than Russian-/export-Flankers, which isn’t exactly a difficult point to agree with... It also ties into the visual evidence of the signature-reduction work done on the J-16...
Signature reduction work is far more prominent on 2010s iterations of Russian aircraft (su-35s, mig-29k) than on Chinese ones(flankers at least; j-10c is more controversial); the only Chinese 4th gen fighter aircraft where visual part of signature management really becomes apparent is J-15T.
Even there it's hard to tell if it's thorough hotspot control, or just outflow of already available tech process, applied "may as well" (like on Su-30sm2).
Serration on rear edge is nice, but with overall signature of flanker with weapons it's going to be as effective as a cargo cult.