• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Shape of the wings from 1950s

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
27,310
Reaction score
4,086
Hi,

please see;
http://www.flightglobal.com/PDFArchive/View/1952/1952%20-%202830.html
 

Attachments

  • Project 1.JPG
    Project 1.JPG
    20 KB · Views: 179
  • Project 2.JPG
    Project 2.JPG
    30.7 KB · Views: 183
  • Project 3.JPG
    Project 3.JPG
    26.7 KB · Views: 173
  • Project 4.JPG
    Project 4.JPG
    32.6 KB · Views: 164
  • Atomic-powered flying boat.JPG
    Atomic-powered flying boat.JPG
    31.1 KB · Views: 158
  • untitled.JPG
    untitled.JPG
    32.7 KB · Views: 37

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
27,310
Reaction score
4,086
Hi,

did that Atomic-powered flying boat design by Saunders-Roe ?.
 

Attachments

  • index.jpg
    index.jpg
    31.1 KB · Views: 39

lark

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
1,807
Reaction score
80
Illustration 2,3 and 4 are artists impressions for Proff. G.Hill's
Aero isoclinic wingtip (rotatable wingtips) concepts.
Short Sherpa was the proof of the idea.
 

steelpillow

So many projects, so little time...
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
1,013
Reaction score
452
Website
www.steelpillow.com
lark said:
Illustration 2,3 and 4 are artists impressions for Proff. G.Hill's
Aero isoclinic wingtip (rotatable wingtips) concepts.
Short Sherpa was the proof of the idea.

I'd suggest that only 2 is inspired by Hill's aero-isoclinic wing work, as the rotating tips were something he was fond of, it bears more than a passing resemblance to his Short Sherpa and the article says something about it. 3 is the crescent type as fitted to the Handley Page Victor and based originally on German research, as far as I know Hill was not involved and any resemblance is coincidental. 4 is a curious thing I have not seen before, I don't know who brewed it up and unlike the other two it was never built.
 

lark

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
1,807
Reaction score
80
Project 2 is the Short PD.8 of May 1952.
The others could be artist impressions of the swept forward or cresent wing shape indeed.
I have no idea about the strange "split" at the wingstip of these

Source for the PD.8 : Air Enthusiast No. 81 page 54.
 

robunos

You're Mad, You Are.....
Senior Member
Joined
May 1, 2007
Messages
1,955
Reaction score
325
3. is indeed a crescent-wing aircraft, very similar to the Handley-Page HP.88 testbed aircraft.
4. is described in the linked article as a 'reverse crescent wing', and IMHO is shown purely to illustrate some of the more exotic configurations being studied at the time. The M-Wing is briefly mentioned in the article.
1. is extremely interesting. The article states :-

"A typical aerofoil section for a suction wing is illustrated and also a proposal for a suction wing airliner made by Mr. T. S. Keeble at the Third Anglo-American Aeronautical Conference. On the basis of results obtained from test with the experimental glider flown by the Australian Aeronautical Research Laboratories, such an airliner would carry forty percent more load and would be forty percent faster than one designed on conventional lines while still consuming no more fuel for the same range."

There is a thread on the suction wing test programme here :

http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,10444.msg98181.html#msg98181

including a drawing of the proposed scale test model of the Suction Wing Airliner, the GAD-4.
I will update the above thread with the images posted here.

cheers,
Robin.
 

Attachments

  • suction wing aerofoil.jpg
    suction wing aerofoil.jpg
    52.7 KB · Views: 11
Top