Rockwell/MBB X-31 design evolution

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
28,455
Reaction score
6,108
My dears,

do you know Rockwell SNAKE project?

[Removed picture - better copy below - Admin]
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,274
Reaction score
1,790
Later Rockwell artist's concept of SNAKE - almost X-31 configuration already
 

Attachments

  • snake.jpg
    snake.jpg
    26.5 KB · Views: 1,375

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
13,603
Reaction score
7,619
The initial SNAKE configuration bore a superficial resemblance to the earlier HiMAT design (canard and wing-mounted twin vertical tails); however, the new configuration was designed analytically with computers and a minimum amount of wind-tunnel tests. Unfortunately, Croom’s aerodynamic tests of the initial SNAKE configuration in the Langley 30- by 60-Foot (Full-Scale) Tunnel indicated unacceptable stability and control characteristics. The configuration was unstable in pitch, roll, and yaw for all angles of attack.

Based on their extensive experience with stability and control characteristics of advanced fighters, Croom and Johnson provided the Rockwell team with several recommendations to cure the problems exhibited by the SNAKE configuration. The configuration modifications resulted in satisfactory characteristics, and the aerodynamic deficiencies of the initial SNAKE design had been eliminated. Rockwell was grateful for the guidance and innovation contributed by Langley in the evolution of the SNAKE configuration.

http://oea.larc.nasa.gov/PAIS/Partners/X_31.html

[Removed picture - better copy below - Admin]
 

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
13,603
Reaction score
7,619
Here we see how the Rockwell SNAKE studies and MBB J-90/P-30 studies merged into the X-31.

Source:

Hannes Ross, EADS-Military Aircraft & Mike Robinson, The Boeing Company, X-31: 20 Years of Successful International Cooperation
AIAA 2003-2572
 

Attachments

  • X-31-evolution.jpg
    X-31-evolution.jpg
    62.9 KB · Views: 1,307

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,274
Reaction score
1,790
Oh, it was real mutato potato then...
 

richard

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
May 1, 2006
Messages
571
Reaction score
55
It seems that VFW was involved too ,and that the X-31 and TFK were closely related .
- Two VFW studies for the TFK shown at the Hannover Salon in 1980 (Air et Cosmos 1980)
- VFW-FSW (1982) shown by Overscan in the TFK topic
- X-31 4 views as tried at Langley (Luftfahrtfoschung in Deutschland ; Hirschel,Prem,Madelung; Bernard&Graefe Verlag 2001)
 

Attachments

  • X-31.jpg
    X-31.jpg
    98.3 KB · Views: 348
  • VFW-FSW.jpg
    VFW-FSW.jpg
    119.2 KB · Views: 977
  • VFW:TFK.jpg
    VFW:TFK.jpg
    95.4 KB · Views: 1,000
  • VFW-TFK.jpg
    VFW-TFK.jpg
    42.9 KB · Views: 986

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
13,603
Reaction score
7,619
In 1981, VFW was taken over by MBB, having been merged with Fokker to form VFW-Fokker in 1969, but then de-merged to form an independent company again in 1980.

This should help. From 1981 VFW was part of MBB.
 
Last edited:

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
13,603
Reaction score
7,619

Attachments

  • SNAKE.jpg
    SNAKE.jpg
    89 KB · Views: 153

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
13,603
Reaction score
7,619
Thanks to Dan Raymer's autobiography "Living in the Future" we can understand the design progression now.

The original SNAKE design was developed by Rockwell Columbus division as the LA division were too busy with B-1 work. Later on, the project was returned to LA division, but it was too different to the MBB (TKF-90) configurations to use any of the MBB work. The Germans were putting in money and wanted it to look like the Eurofighter they were developing while the US fighter effort at that time was all stealthy and hence classified. Rockwell's LA division essentially started the design again with something that looked more like the Eurofighter. Result - happy Germans :)

There's a lot more about it and other projects in the book, so buy it for the full story :)
 

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
13,603
Reaction score
7,619

Attachments

  • L-85-6555.jpg
    L-85-6555.jpg
    472.9 KB · Views: 139
  • L-85-6554.jpg
    L-85-6554.jpg
    459.2 KB · Views: 129
  • L-85-6553.jpg
    L-85-6553.jpg
    495.2 KB · Views: 135
  • L-85-3093.jpg
    L-85-3093.jpg
    472.9 KB · Views: 135
  • L-85-3092.jpg
    L-85-3092.jpg
    489.8 KB · Views: 134
  • L-85-3091.jpg
    L-85-3091.jpg
    529.6 KB · Views: 133
  • L-85-3090.jpg
    L-85-3090.jpg
    480.5 KB · Views: 136
  • L-85-3089.jpg
    L-85-3089.jpg
    510.8 KB · Views: 164

Stargazer2006

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
13,221
Reaction score
822
Machdiamond said:
No it never flew without its vertical tail but the flight control system laws were modified to simulate tailless handling qualities for a study that was illustrated by a photo montage.

Here is photographic evidence of this: the same picture published with and without the tail fin. Please note that the caption says "Photo concept".
 

Attachments

  • X-31_comparison.jpg
    X-31_comparison.jpg
    601 KB · Views: 291

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
13,603
Reaction score
7,619
Here's some interesting stuff on the SNAKE / early X-31.

As richard suggested earlier in the topic, it turns out the initial SNAKE configuration was developed at VFW (later, MBB) in 1980 as an alternate TKF study. It was sent to Rockwell to work on and give to NASA to test, as both companies were interested in post-stall manouvering.

This wasn't the only configuration tested - there was also this scaled-down single engine MBB TKF-90 design.

Source: Stephen Ransom Configuration Development of a Research Aircraft with Post-Stall Maneuverability in AIAA Journal of Aircraft, 1983

http://crgis.ndc.nasa.gov/historic/...els_and_Tests_N-Z#X-31_and_Rockwell-MBB_Snake
 

Attachments

  • L-86-5776.jpg
    L-86-5776.jpg
    541.9 KB · Views: 155
  • L-86-5773.jpg
    L-86-5773.jpg
    489.7 KB · Views: 122
  • L-86-5772.jpg
    L-86-5772.jpg
    587.7 KB · Views: 1,093
  • L-86-5769.jpg
    L-86-5769.jpg
    606.3 KB · Views: 1,186
  • L-86-5768.jpg
    L-86-5768.jpg
    538.5 KB · Views: 1,277
  • L-86-5767.jpg
    L-86-5767.jpg
    532.7 KB · Views: 1,418
  • VFW 1980 Post-stall alternate TKF configuration.jpg
    VFW 1980 Post-stall alternate TKF configuration.jpg
    76.6 KB · Views: 1,442

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
28,455
Reaction score
6,108

Attachments

  • MBB-VFW  5.png
    MBB-VFW 5.png
    22 KB · Views: 164
  • MBB-VFW  4.png
    MBB-VFW 4.png
    19.4 KB · Views: 165
  • MBB-VFW  3.png
    MBB-VFW 3.png
    25.9 KB · Views: 174
  • MBB-VFW  2.png
    MBB-VFW 2.png
    25.6 KB · Views: 226
  • MBB-VFW  1.png
    MBB-VFW 1.png
    22.8 KB · Views: 220

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
28,455
Reaction score
6,108
A good report about Rockwell/MBB X-31;

http://www.fzt.haw-hamburg.de/pers/Scholz/ewade/2007/EWADE2007_Ross.pdf
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    519.5 KB · Views: 191
  • 2.png
    2.png
    36.9 KB · Views: 286

Winston

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
127
Reaction score
23
X-31 art from ebay.
 

Attachments

  • X-31 art1.jpg
    X-31 art1.jpg
    590.1 KB · Views: 215

Motocar

I really should change my personal text
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
688
Reaction score
241
Cutaway drawing Rockwell/MBB X-31, author Mike Badrocke and published in the magazine Combat Aircarft
 

Attachments

  • X-31-cutaway.jpg
    X-31-cutaway.jpg
    507.6 KB · Views: 297

ScrutorAudax

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
Jun 5, 2015
Messages
48
Reaction score
14
Hesham, are the nodes on each side of the aircraft depicted in Fig. 17 (MBB-VFW 3.png) for translational thrust in post-stall maneuvers?
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
28,455
Reaction score
6,108
ScrutorAudax said:
Hesham, are the nodes on each side of the aircraft depicted in Fig. 17 (MBB-VFW 3.png) for translational thrust in post-stall maneuvers?

Hi Scrutor,

to be honest,I don't know,maybe someone can help.
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
28,455
Reaction score
6,108
Later Rockwell artist's concept of SNAKE - almost X-31 configuration already

From L+K 3/1988,it's first time for me to know it was called EFM,Enhaced Fighter Maneuverability.

.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    121.6 KB · Views: 164

Apophenia

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
2,885
Reaction score
1,554
From L+K 3/1988,it's first time for me to know it was called EFM,Enhaced Fighter Maneuverability.

The joint US-German research project was called the Enhanced Fighter Maneuverability program so the X-31 prototypes became the 'EFM demonstrators'.
 

RAP

ACCESS: Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2008
Messages
701
Reaction score
501
Not design evolution but hopefully still interesting.
 

Attachments

  • X31.jpg
    X31.jpg
    857.1 KB · Views: 110
  • X31s.jpg
    X31s.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 117
  • X31 windtunnel.jpg
    X31 windtunnel.jpg
    2.6 MB · Views: 132
  • X31 cutaway.jpg
    X31 cutaway.jpg
    1,019 KB · Views: 151
  • X31 b.jpg
    X31 b.jpg
    3.1 MB · Views: 144
  • X31 18.jpg
    X31 18.jpg
    2.8 MB · Views: 143
  • 3 view_edited-1.jpg
    3 view_edited-1.jpg
    2.1 MB · Views: 181

fightingirish

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2006
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
1,234
Herbst-Manöver... o_O

Ah, ok, not Autumn-Maneuver, but named after Dr. Wolfgang Herbst, a remarkable pioneer of extreme maneuverability who tragically died before his concept realized its fullest potential. :(

Source:
PDF: https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/files/Flying_Beyond_the_Stall.pdf
Book(Epub/mobi): https://www.nasa.gov/connect/ebooks/flying_beyond_the_stall_detail.html (Free download!)



Edit:
I highly recommend the chapter "Origins, Design, and Development of the X-31"! :cool:
[...]Of all these, the Sabre—the most elegant and evocative of all early jet-age airplanes—had the greatest appeal. Old ex–Air National Guard F-86H aircraft were available from the Navy at Naval Air Station (NAS) China Lake, where they were being converted into target drones. The figure to the right shows how an F-86H might have been converted into the Enhanced Fighter Maneuverability program [EFM].
Making this an attractive proposition was that the entire tail of the F-86 comes off for engine removal, meaning that a new tail section could easily be fabricated to use the same attachment points.
The portions of the F-86 that the EFM would use are indicated in the figure as the shaded areas of the forward fuselage and the wing box.
The cockpit is moved forward from the midsection and the “hole” behind the cockpit is filled in with a “flat-wrapped” skin over a new internal structure.
A chin inlet, nose cone, and canard are added, and then the F-86 wing leading and trailing edges are removed and replaced with a delta wing around the old F-86 structural wing box.
Further increasing the idea’s attractiveness is that many parts and components from the original F-86H could be reused, including the wing box and carry-through structure,
tricycle landing gear, cockpit and canopy, large portions of the fuselage, engine mounts, fuel system, and many subsystems.
Rockwell’s Dan Raymer built a foam-board model to show how it would be done. Though the F-86 was an understandable choice for the EFM project, concerns over the likely fatigue
life of an elderly airframe that was at least 30 years old, as well as its relatively heavy fuselage weight, led to dropping the Sabre from contention.[...]
 

Attachments

  • 20200424_Douglas_A_Joyce_Flying beyond the stall_From F-86H to EFM X-31.jpg
    20200424_Douglas_A_Joyce_Flying beyond the stall_From F-86H to EFM X-31.jpg
    33.9 KB · Views: 158
Last edited:

Motocar

I really should change my personal text
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
688
Reaction score
241
Herbst-Manöver... o_O

Ah, ok, not Autumn-Maneuver, but named after Dr. Wolfgang Herbst, a remarkable pioneer of extreme maneuverability who tragically died before his concept realized its fullest potential. :(

Source:
PDF: https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/files/Flying_Beyond_the_Stall.pdf
Book(Epub/mobi): https://www.nasa.gov/connect/ebooks/flying_beyond_the_stall_detail.html (Free download!)



Edit:
I highly recommend the chapter "Origins, Design, and Development of the X-31"! :cool:
[...]Of all these, the Sabre—the most elegant and evocative of all early jet-age airplanes—had the greatest appeal. Old ex–Air National Guard F-86H aircraft were available from the Navy at Naval Air Station (NAS) China Lake, where they were being converted into target drones. The figure to the right shows how an F-86H might have been converted into the Enhanced Fighter Maneuverability program [EFM].
Making this an attractive proposition was that the entire tail of the F-86 comes off for engine removal, meaning that a new tail section could easily be fabricated to use the same attachment points.
The portions of the F-86 that the EFM would use are indicated in the figure as the shaded areas of the forward fuselage and the wing box.
La cabina se mueve hacia adelante desde la sección media y el "agujero" detrás de la cabina se rellena con una piel "envuelta plana" sobre una nueva estructura interna.
Se agregan una entrada de mentón, un cono de nariz y un canard, y luego se eliminan los bordes de ataque y de salida del ala del F-86 y se reemplazan con un ala delta alrededor de la antigua caja de ala estructural del F-86.
Lo que aumenta aún más el atractivo de la idea es que muchas piezas y componentes del F-86H original podrían reutilizarse, incluida la caja del ala y la estructura de transporte.
tren de aterrizaje triciclo, cabina y toldo, grandes porciones del fuselaje, soportes del motor, sistema de combustible y muchos subsistemas.
Dan Raymer de Rockwell construyó un modelo de tablero de espuma para mostrar cómo se haría. Aunque el F-86 fue una elección comprensible para el proyecto EFM, las preocupaciones sobre la probable fatiga
life of an elderly airframe that was at least 30 years old, as well as its relatively heavy fuselage weight, led to dropping the Sabre from contention.[...]
Good for speculative cutaway drawing...!
 

Similar threads

Top