martinbayer
ACCESS: Top Secret
- Joined
- 6 January 2009
- Messages
- 4,739
- Reaction score
- 6,496
Let's make it a VTOL and have some popcorn...
You're better informed than me. My suggestion is more as a fall back.That wasn't the CONOPS I read, they clearly talked about landing more or less at the site of the turbine generators.
If they're still talking about unimproved runways near the wind turbine areas, the design would be much better served with turboprops than fans. So that wing with 4x A400 engines per side, maybe even 6x per side.Windrunner: Why there won’t be a scale prototype for the world’s biggest aircraft
The company developing what is set to be by far the biggest aircraft the world has ever seen - the Windrunner - will not fly a scale prototype. Radia CEO, Mark Lundstrom, explains why in a wide-ranging interview with AGN on the sidelines of the Paris Air Show.
Read article here: Aerospace Global News
View attachment 775977
A model of the Windrunner was displayed at Paris Air Show. Photo: Joanna Bailey
View attachment 775979
View attachment 775980
Might go against the ethos of using only 'off the shelf' proven components.If they're still talking about unimproved runways near the wind turbine areas, the design would be much better served with turboprops than fans. So that wing with 4x A400 engines per side, maybe even 6x per side.
A400 engines are proven. You just need more of them.Might go against the ethos of using only 'off the shelf' proven components.
Even though the engines are all proven and certified, using more than 4 will mean changes to the cockpit controls etc that call for more risk assessment and certifion. Then the fuel system with more permutations of 'tank to engine' feeds.A400 engines are proven. You just need more of them.
Or are you/they meaning "parts we pulled out of the Boneyard"?
So talk to whoever is doing the B-52 8-engine FADEC cockpit interface design and "acquire" a set, then install the prop controls.Even though the engines are all proven and certified, using more than 4 will mean changes to the cockpit controls etc that call for more risk assessment and certifion. Then the fuel system with more permutations of 'tank to engine' feeds.
It's just that the turbofans are so bad for dirt strips and anything approximating STOL performance...I'm not disagreeing with your logic, just suggesting Radia will go with a sub-optimal solution as being easier to get flying. I've worked on enough projects where obviously good proposals were squashed by the cost of getting approval.