- Joined
- 21 January 2015
- Messages
- 14,997
- Reaction score
- 24,216
So a RC model then?I'm starting to take a closer look at the footage and thought I could share a couple of things I might have noticed.
Last edited by a moderator:
So a RC model then?I'm starting to take a closer look at the footage and thought I could share a couple of things I might have noticed.
From an aero perspective i would image stability and wing vortex elimination are two big perks of this, I bet they almost "cup" the air underneath like a parachute which could give some pretty wild agility I suppose. I think there would be a roll instability but the initial dihedral to the tip anhedral may alleviate that.X-36 was developed to test a tailless platform in regards to very high maneuverability plus you can see the planform alignment features even though it's subscale. Bird of Prey was an LO demonstrator for the Boeing X-45A UCAV vehicles.
I am not an aero guy but if Boeing did combine the two configurations I am curious of the balance they are trying to achieve in regards to potential high maneuverability, LO and BVR missions. If the aircraft videoed is real (probably is), they could still be flying the demonstrator and/or flying an EMD version built out at 51, 51 has grown quite a bit and I am sure has developed and built manufacturing facility capability as well.
If it does in fact have the drooped wing tips, the high maneuverability aspect would be interesting, to my knowledge, was there any other operational true fighter aircraft with a similar configuration?
This is not "fan made' design, but Sukhoi's placeholder design for 6G fighter.The (fan made) Russian design fail here.
Nope, not that small.So a RC model then?
But what's "full scale"?Worth recalling that when Will Roper first disclosed AII-X demonstrator flight, he explicitly described what had fown as a 'full-scale flight demonstrator.'
Communication , and it work F-47 shadow is every where on the Web, Area51 people are Genius to use a You Tube Chanel to communicate , and it enjoy every of US , Thank you Shadow people of Groom LakeBut what's "full scale"?
Every photo, image and comment released is carefully checked and crafted,
Iran doing deep strike against Area 51 /ssry but.../sView attachment 814864
You are correct, the gull wings BoP were specific due to no FBW control system and I think the BoP control system was purely mechanical with no hydraulic boost capability. It was a little bit of a handful to fly but OK for a demonstrator.In one of the many F-47 threads it was discussed that the BOP's gull wings were in lieu of complex fbw or associated software.
Maybe in this case the gull wings will be a feature of the demonstrator, but not the final plane?
Full scale here meaning manned aircraft size, not a subscale UAV I think. I don't think you can conclude the AII-X was the same size as the F-47.Worth recalling that when Will Roper first disclosed AII-X demonstrator flight, he explicitly described what had fown as a 'full-scale flight demonstrator.'
Iran got a steal on the 6th Gen design, and we all mocked them.sry but.../sView attachment 814864
Where have we seen this shape before?If you don't use the full-size demo version, you can only change other directions, such as the CCA drone."dog head"
the true reason for the current conflict. nuclear weapons and straigh of Temu were all distractionsIran got a steal on the 6th Gen design, and we all mocked them.
This shape is beautiful it remind me my favorite toy when I was a child![]()
![]()
Nope the MB Starbird a precursor design (laugh)Is that a Y-wing knock off?![]()
In the uploader's personal opinion, he stated that the object flying could range anywhere from 22 meters to 28 meters in size, depending on the altitude it was flying at the moment the Project FEAR team caught and filmed it. If true, even the lower end of that scale is already slightly almost as long as the F-111 Aardvark.