• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Possible McDonnell Douglas QRI-related configuration

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,043
Reaction score
863
I may be wrong, and it can be just generic configuration. Surely this thing would be *fast* one. It goes from MDC 1970s paper presented at 1970 AIAA Fighter Conference in St.Louis. Anyone have seen it before?
 

Attachments

  • MacAir_1970.jpg
    MacAir_1970.jpg
    49.4 KB · Views: 307

shockonlip

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 29, 2008
Messages
605
Reaction score
4
Yes. I may have a similar concept drawing.
If I recall, the drawing is from the same time.
I will post this evening.

Do you have a referdnce to the paper?

If I recall correctly, my drawing has a caption that indicates
turbofan-ramjets were to power it.

The cockpit area and nose looks very similar. The inlets on the
underside are 2-D however and not 3-D.

You'll note, that the front view doesn't really match the side view.
My drawing could match the side view fiarly closely, but my view
is a left front quarter view of the airplane climbing out.

I'll post tonight.
 

elider

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Messages
122
Reaction score
2
This may be helpful: The first pic I got off the net years ago, the second is from AW&ST.
 

Attachments

  • hsi-mc.jpg
    hsi-mc.jpg
    23 KB · Views: 244
  • Hypersonic Model.jpg
    Hypersonic Model.jpg
    42 KB · Views: 224

Orionblamblam

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
7,901
Reaction score
1,134
Website
www.aerospaceprojectsreview.com
Probably related design shown in a bit of Keith Ferris artwork. Note the dorsal inlets... which you can see faired-over on the wind tunnel model.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4062.jpg
    IMG_4062.jpg
    98 KB · Views: 256
  • IMG_4065.jpg
    IMG_4065.jpg
    171.6 KB · Views: 249

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
7,370
Reaction score
2,533
Hi overscan! My opinion is same as yours!
Turbofan ramjet engine! Very impressive. Some kind of variable cycle engine?
Is it fail to develop?
 

shockonlip

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 29, 2008
Messages
605
Reaction score
4
Yes Elider, your top concept photo, that's it!
The photo in the book is larger.

That is Photo 168 in "US Jet Fighters Since 1945" by Robert F. Dorr
copyright 1988
Blandford War Photo-Files

Caption:
"One of the fighter designs which never got off the drawing board
was this McDonnell proposal, dating to August 1968 and studied
in the 1970s, for a hypersonic interceptor to be powered by very
powerful fan jet engines. MDC"
 

shockonlip

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 29, 2008
Messages
605
Reaction score
4
blackkite said:
Hi overscan! My opinion is same as yours!
Turbofan ramjet engine! Very impressive. Some kind of variable cycle engine?
Is it fail to develop?

The technology for these kinds of engines are still being developed.
For example, the recent GE57 studied under the Revolutionary Turbine
Accelerator (RTA) program, which was for a ground demonstration engine
to demonstrate mode transition from an augmented turbofan to a ramjet
to demonstrate the thrust level required to accelerate a future hypersonic
vehicle to scramjet take over speed.
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,043
Reaction score
863
shockonlip said:
The photo in the book is larger.

Can you scan it in higher resolution and post then?
 

Antonio

ACCESS: Top Secret
Staff member
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
3,452
Reaction score
183
"US Jet Fighters Since 1945" by Robert F. Dorr

Shockonlip, If my memory is right I remember in the book there was also a drawing of McDD VFX and also an ATF concepts. Could you post if too?.

Many thanks in advance,

Antonio
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,043
Reaction score
863
My thanks in advance go too!
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,043
Reaction score
863
quick reaction interceptor
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,043
Reaction score
863
shockonlip said:
Do you have a referdnce to the paper?

AIAA No. 70-364
APPLICATION OF COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN PROGRAMS FOR THE TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT OF COMPLEX FIGHTER DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
Dr. W. B. Herbst and H. G. ROSS
Engineering Technology Division
McDonnell Douglas Corporation
St. Louis, Missouri

All said is that "...figure is showing a computer-generated drawing of a high speed aircraft."
 

shockonlip

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 29, 2008
Messages
605
Reaction score
4
Evidently, I don't have a high resolution scanner. The result
doesn't look anything like the quality of the original.

While trying to scan, I also realized that to properly scan these,
I'd have to remove the pages from the book as well.

So, sorry.

Just for my information, what do people use for a high quality scanner?
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,043
Reaction score
863
For example, any start-level Epson scanner in USD $100 range will feet. Scan higher than 300 dpi resolution is just no need.
Epson Perfection V300 Photo $99.99
http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/consumer/consDetail.jsp?BV_UseBVCookie=yes&oid=63077159
Epson Perfection 4490 Photo $119.99 with $30.00 Mail-In Rebate (one that I use)
http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/consumer/consDetail.jsp?BV_UseBVCookie=yes&oid=53540925

Both are free ground shipping directly from Epson USA site. I think that you even can find them much cheaper now.

Don't buy these attractive, thin scanners using CIS-technology - they are looking cool, but scans are awful, buy those 'thick' using CCD image sensor.
 

Attachments

  • 4490.jpg
    4490.jpg
    34.8 KB · Views: 467
  • Genius ColorPage-Slim 1200.jpg
    Genius ColorPage-Slim 1200.jpg
    13.4 KB · Views: 78

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
12,351
Reaction score
3,372
Having said that, any scanner can produce OK results if you know how to use it correctly. Scanning a photo is easy but scanning from a book is tricky as the image in the book is made of lots of dots in a pattern. When you scan, this dot pattern can cause nasty patterns to appear in the scan. Many scanners will have an option to reduce this effect usually called "descreen". Sometimes changing the scan dpi up or down can reduce visible artifacts too.

Another way to get a decent image is to scan at a very high resolution (600dpi or more) and then use a "gaussian blur" operation in a photo editing package. Alter the blur size until dots blend together and the pattern just disappears. Then size the picture down to a web-friendly size.
 

Just call me Ray

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Messages
676
Reaction score
10
Haha, I'm not in a hurry to buy another Epson product, but flateric's scanner advice is what you want to follow.
 

robunos

You're Mad, You Are.....
Senior Member
Joined
May 1, 2007
Messages
1,895
Reaction score
232
i use one of these, but then i always did go in for a bit of overkill... ;D ::)

cheers,
Robin.
 

Attachments

  • big_scanner.JPG
    big_scanner.JPG
    72.9 KB · Views: 80

XP67_Moonbat

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
2,160
Reaction score
55
I'll bet Airrocket has something to add to these procedings. He's cool about the old McD projects of this nature.
 

XP67_Moonbat

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
2,160
Reaction score
55
I'd say from the same family tree. Our friends in the know on this forum, feel free to contribute. If you can, of course.
 

Similar threads

Top