News: SCRAMJET prepped for launch - HiFIRE-2

DSE

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
12 April 2010
Messages
461
Reaction score
41
WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE, N.M. - Members from Air Force Research Laboratory, NASA and the Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme division, White Sands Detachment, are working together to ready the Hypersonic International Flight Research Experimentation (HIFiRE) Flight 2 research vehicle for launch later this year.
http://www.dvidshub.net/video/139353/scramjet-prepped-launch

http://www.dvidshub.net/video/139352/hifire-flight-2-weight-disribution-testing-b-roll

Technicians mount the Hypersonic International Flight Research Experimentation (HIFiRE) Flight 2 research vehicle on a turntable for weight distribution evaluations at White Sands Missile Range's 300k test facility.
538770_q75.jpg


538769_q75.jpg


538768_q75.jpg
 
Another success for HIFiRE !

HIFiRE Scramjet Research Flight Will Advance Hypersonic Technology
May 9, 2012
The U.S. Air Force Aeronautical Systems Center issued the following news release:
An international team that includes NASA and the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) is celebrating the successful launch of an experimental hypersonic scramjet research flight from the Pacific Missile Range Facility in Hawaii.
NASA, AFRL and Australia's Defence Science and Technology Organisation (DSTO) are working with a number of partners on the HIFiRE (Hypersonic International Flight Research Experimentation Program) program to advance hypersonic flight - normally defined as beginning at Mach 5 - five times the speed of sound. The research program is aimed at exploring the fundamental technologies needed to achieve practical hypersonic flight. Being able to fly at hypersonic speeds would revolutionize high speed to long distance flight and provide more cost-effective access to space.

During the experiment the scramjet climbed to approximately 100K feet in altitude, accelerated from Mach 6 to Mach 8 and operated about 12 seconds - a huge accomplishment for flight at hypersonic speeds. It was the fourth of a planned series of up to 10 flights under HIFiRE and the second focused on scramjet engine research.
The HIFiRE 2 scramjet research payload included a hypersonic inward turning inlet, followed by a scramjet combustor and dual-exhaust nozzle. In other words it looked sort of like a giant mechanical alligator with its jaws open or an old-fashioned clothespin - the kind without the metal clip. Over 700 instruments on board recorded and transmitted data to researchers on the ground. The payload was developed under a partnership between the AFRL and NASA, with contributions from the Navy's detachment at White Sands Missile Range, N.M. and ATK GASL located in Ronkonkoma, N.Y.
"This is the first time we have flight tested a hydrocarbon-fueled scramjet accelerating from Mach 6.5 to Mach 8," said NASA Hypersonics Project Scientist Ken Rock, based at NASA'S Langley Research Center in Hampton, Va. "The test will give us unique scientific data about scramjets transitioning from subsonic to supersonic combustion - something we can't simulate in wind tunnels."
The data collected during the execution of the HIFiRE experiments is expected to make a significant contribution to the development of future high-speed air-breathing engine concepts and help improve design, modeling, and simulation tools.
The success of the three-stage launch system, consisting of two Terrier boost motors and an Oriole sustainer motor, is another significant achievement of the HIFiRE 2 mission. The HIFiRE 2 mission, the first flight of this sounding rocket configuration, opens the door for a new high-performance flight configuration to support future Air Force, Navy, and NASA flight research.
The HIFiRE team has already achieved some significant milestones such as the design, assembly and extensive pre-flight testing of the hypersonic vehicles and the design of complex avionics and flight systems. This successful flight test of a hydrocarbon-fueled scramjet research combustor represents yet another significant achievement for the HIFiRE program, with additional test flights scheduled in the coming months and years.

http://www.avionics-intelligence.com/news/2012/05/09/hifire-scramjet-research-flight-will-advance-hypersonic-technology.html
 
Same text story as above, but http://www.wpafb.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123301289 also had a launch photo:


The Hypersonic International Flight Research Experimentation Program (HIFiRE) launches an experimental hypersonic scramjet vehicle from the Pacific Missile Range Facility in Hawaii during a recent research flight. The program is a joint effort between Air Force Research Laboratory, NASA and Australia’s Defence Science and Technology Organisation aimed at exploring the fundamental technologies needed to achieve practical hypersonic flight. (courtesy image)
 

Attachments

  • 120508-F-ZU869-002.jpg
    120508-F-ZU869-002.jpg
    78.4 KB · Views: 459
They should move these guys to the X-51 project.
 
DSE said:
sferrin said:
They should move these guys to the X-51 project.

Be careful what you ask for.

Why would it be a bad thing? (I don't mean just switch teams. That'd be a disaster. I'd think it might not be a bad idea if they at least TALKED though.)
 
sferrin said:
DSE said:
sferrin said:
They should move these guys to the X-51 project.

Be careful what you ask for.

Why would it be a bad thing? (I don't mean just switch teams. That'd be a disaster. I'd think it might not be a bad idea if they at least TALKED though.)

Because my guess is you'd be somewhat disappointed with the answer. The community isn't THAT large. Not only have they talked, there is cross-pollination among the groups at various levels. Remember, despite the the large number of accomplishments of the HF-2 team, flying a captive gaseous-fueled heavyweight "engined" experiment is a considerably simpler endeavor than the free-flying liquid-fueled flightweight engined X-51.
 
DSE said:
sferrin said:
DSE said:
sferrin said:
They should move these guys to the X-51 project.

Be careful what you ask for.

Why would it be a bad thing? (I don't mean just switch teams. That'd be a disaster. I'd think it might not be a bad idea if they at least TALKED though.)

Because my guess is you'd be somewhat disappointed with the answer. The community isn't THAT large. Not only have they talked, there is cross-pollination among the groups at various levels. Remember, despite the the large number of accomplishments of the HF-2 team, flying a captive gaseous-fueled heavyweight "engined" experiment is a considerably simpler endeavor than the free-flying liquid-fueled flightweight engined X-51.

That is disappointing. As much potential as hypersonic flight has and it's so neglected in the US.
 
DSE said:
sferrin said:
That is disappointing. As much potential as hypersonic flight has and it's so neglected in the US.


You found what you wanted all ready exists and you find that disappoint. Some others feel differently.
American Hypersonic Weapons 'Threat to Russia' - Rogozin, http://www.spacewar.com/reports/American_Hypersonic_Weapons_Are_Threat_To_Russia_Says_Rogozin_999.html

Glad they communicate with each other. Disappointed that the effort is so small everybody knows each other.
 
sferrin said:
Glad they communicate with each other. Disappointed that the effort is so small everybody knows each other.

Think of an intersecting Venn diagram of the programs with maybe 5-15%9(WAG) overlap. It's mainly driven by the funding fits and starts. Hard to develop and keep any real sort of standing army given the ups and downs.
 
DSE said:
It's mainly driven by the funding fits and starts. Hard to develop and keep any real sort of standing army given the ups and downs.

Oh I know. It's amazing they accomplish anything at all the way they're starved for funding and get cancelled before the challenge coins are even made.
 
Another launch was done 28 September, from Andøya (Norway). Reached mach 8 and height of 35 km.
 
flanker said:
Another launch was done 28 September, from Andøya (Norway). Reached mach 8 and height of 35 km.

Apples and oranges, imo. HF-2 flew a depressed trajectory, while this was and up and over trajectory.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom