• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

NAVAL SHORADS

RP1

I see the truth in it.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
440
Reaction score
19
Website
rp-one.net
A number of naval SHOrt Range Air Defence Systems have been proposed over the years.

Firstly, the Bofors RBS-70:



Featured in the "World Naval Developments" section of the December 1986 USNI Proceedings:

• 4 round launcher
• Laser guidance using a Signaal LIOD optronic director
• LIOD can acquire and track a target at 10km
• Missile range of 5km
• Systems integration by Signaal

The article notes the threat from light aircraft being used in a Kamikaze attack, which might fly too slow to be engaged by more advanced systems and which where authorisation to fire would only be given at the last moment.

IIRC a navalised RBS-70 has been proposed in a couple of different forms, but the only use of the weapon has been in the conventional tripod-mounted form.

RP1
 

vajt

CLEARANCE: Confidential
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
74
Reaction score
1
Wasn't there also a proposal a few years back for a naval turret/platform that would launch the Starstreak?

-----JT-----
 

PMN1

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
716
Reaction score
51
vajt said:
Wasn't there also a proposal a few years back for a naval turret/platform that would launch the Starstreak?

-----JT-----
From what i've read, the argument against that kind of mounting is that the turret doesn't rotate fast enough for a quick reaction SAM.
 

RP1

I see the truth in it.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
440
Reaction score
19
Website
rp-one.net
Re: NAVAL SHORADS: Starstreak

Short Brothers (Belfast, NI) Starstreak and Starburst missiles:

The Seastreak (Navalised Starstreak):



• Designed to counter future anti-ship missiles
• Fully autonomous
• 24 missiles
• Rotating sensors on mount with below-decks fire control processing
• Detection is by radar, high diving missiles are tracked by radar and sea-skimmers by electro-optics
• Missiles are fired in salvos
• Battery back-up power supply

The Naval Multiple Launcher (NML)





• For Starburst and Starstreak missiles
• Data for Starburst version:
- Range of 4Km
- Turret is 1980mm high with a swept radius of 1270mm
- Power assisted azimuth and elevation drives
- Fire control includes thermal imaging and tracking sensor
- On alert the aimer slews the mounting to the indicated bearing and finds the targets with the IR system
- Automatic tracking then used with laser command link to missile

Both these were presented at RNEE 1991, and were reported in the October 1991 edition of "Warship Technology", a publication of RINA (the Royal Institution of Naval Architects).

- RP1
 

JFC Fuller

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
3,358
Reaction score
589
Picture of the Seastreak mock-up from the flight global archive attached:

Short's received a "prefeasibility" contract from the Royal Navy in 1986 to study the application of Starstreak to point defence; Seastreak seems to have been the product of this but it was essentially a private venture. The Admiralty Research Establishment (ARE) continued looking at a Very Short-Range Air Defence (VSRAD) solution to replace Phalanx and Goalkeeper. Additionally Short's Defence Systems executive director, Charles Rain-Brown, stressed that Seastreak would not be a solution for the very short-range air defence needs of the 21st century which suggests the outcome of the prefeasibility study was not what the RN was looking for.

However, ARE still favoured a small hyper-velocity missile as the ultimate solution and Shorts were apparently talking to Thomson-CSF about a potential joint programme for a future HVM for the 2000s for that role.

Edit: Thorn EMI were apparently working on new millimeter waveband fuzes for which the VSRAD programme was a potential application.

Edit 2: The UK programme was also referred to as VSRAD 2000.

Sources: Pieced together from various magazines; Interavia, Flight Global, Janes
 

Attachments

zen

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2007
Messages
1,677
Reaction score
461
Hmmm. ....presumably had things progressed this could have found common cause with German efforts along the same lines.
 

timmymagic

I really should change my personal text
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
19
Reaction score
18
Aselsan of Turkey have exhibited and tested a mount with LMM. Can't see any reason why this wouldn't be compatible with Starstreak (probably no mods required).

https://thaimilitaryandasianregion.wordpress.com/2016/07/12/successful-thales-lightweight-multirole-missile-lmm-firing-from-aselsan-milas-turret/

MSI have proposed the eminently sensible Seahawk Sigma. Again there is no reason why this couldn't carry Starstreak.

https://www.msi-dsl.com/our_products/weapons/sigma.php
 

JFC Fuller

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
3,358
Reaction score
589
I grabbed the attached photo from ThinkDefence. It's interesting and potentially relevant to this thread as the CIWS system mounted between the VLS and the main gun and also on the hangar roof, looks to be the Seastreak system.

I have seen this picture online several times before but I have no idea where its from or the extent to which it reflects any official design concept, there appears to be a date under the artists signature but I can only make out the first two digits (19 obviously); does anybody know any more about this?
 

Attachments

Hood

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
1,677
Reaction score
858
I think the date might be 1986, but its not clear.
That would seem roughly the right date for the Seastreak and note that the EH101 Merlin does not look quite like the final version. This would seem to date it to the late 1980s.
It's an attractive looking design, I wonder if the aft search radar is meant to represent Type 1030 STIR and the foremast radar an early MESAR concept, though that was intended as a fixed four-array system rather than a rotating system which seems to be represented here.
 

JFC Fuller

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
3,358
Reaction score
589
Highly unlikely thats meant to be Type 1030 STIR, too late for that. This feels more like its meant to be representative of the LAMS/FAMS configuration from the very late 1980s/very early 1990s. The two-faced MFR on the foremast would be the original back-to-back EMPAR and the large array aft would be the Thomson-CSF ASTRAL.
 

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
11,189
Reaction score
1,458
If I'm not mistaken, that's official art of the planned Sampson class destroyer from 1996. I remember seeing it (and linking to it in another topic here) on the now sadly defunct Naval Matters website.
 

TomS

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
3,777
Reaction score
676
I've never heard of a Sampson class for the RN. I think this was associated with the pre-Horizon Common Next Generation Frigate (CNGF). The forward radar looks like MESAR, the aft one like Smart-L.
 

RLBH

CLEARANCE: Secret
Joined
May 5, 2007
Messages
259
Reaction score
79
My guess for the date would be 1996 - actually looks like 1946, but that's clearly out of the question! It could well be 1986, or even 1988.

In terms of design, I'd definitely be thinking pre-CNGF based on the exposed mooring deck and proto-Merlin. The radar is clearly MESAR, which began in 1982. Interestingly, the gun looks like the Oto-Melara 127mm - the RN has wanted to get rid of 4.5" for a long time! The rest of the electronics fit is definitely British.

That the Merlin hasn't been nailed down suggests pre-1987 when the prototype flew. That lends credibility to the design being from 1986, presumably making it not just pre-CNGF but also pre-NFR90. If that's the case, though, it raises a question about armament - there are no illuminators, ruling out Standard and any form of Sea Dart. PAAMS doesn't use illuminators, but that project didn't formally start until 1989 or thereabouts. Given the detail given to the electronics fit, I find it hard to believe they've just been missed.

Alternatively, the Merlin has just been painted a bit 'off'; if you look at it from the right angle it isn't too bad. Given the funny-looking gun, a funny-looking Merlin is perfectly plausible. That puts post-NFR90, but pre-CNGF back into the picture. It's definitely relatively early, though, given the lack of extremes in signature reduction. That, too, fits with the timescale for Seastreak.

Based on all the evidence, I'd guess 1988 as the design date. Given the CIWS, reports that the UK wasn't keen on NFR90's lack of one, and reports that the UK was considering withdrawing from NFR90 from 1988, I suspect that this was the UK's domestic alternative that was superceded by NFR90. There's still a question over precisely what main armament was projected - this may have been a notional system at this stage.
 

JFC Fuller

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
3,358
Reaction score
589
PAAMS may have come later but it was "just" a development of the FAMS concept originally conceived as part of NFR90 circa 1986/87. FAMS was essentially ASTER with a multi-function radar (MFR) and long-range radar (LRR). These very quickly became the Selenia/Marconi EMPAR (which was originally a two-faced back-to-back configuration like that in the image) and the Thomson CSF ASTRAL.

I don't think there is any doubt that the weapons/radar fit broadly matches LAMS/FAMS/PAAMS and that in itself is hardly surprising as the basic concept was a constant in RN thinking from about 1986 all the way through to the T45 acquisition.

I concur with Hood, the date under the signature looks most like 1986 (but it could be anything). 1986 would just about work for both Seastreak and FAMS, 1996 feels too late for Seastreak. The general aesthetic looks early which again points to the mid-late 1980s.
 

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
11,189
Reaction score
1,458
TomS said:
I've never heard of a Sampson class for the RN. I think this was associated with the pre-Horizon Common Next Generation Frigate (CNGF). The forward radar looks like MESAR, the aft one like Smart-L.
Sorry, I misremembered slightly. It was actually the Sampson AAW variant of the Horizon class destroyer for the Royal Navy, of which 12 were planned to be procured. I believe that there were also plans for a lower cost General Purpose variant for the Royal Navy without the full Sampson/PAAMS system, but they still hadn't been finalised by the time the UK pulled out of the program and shortly afterwards started work on the Type 45.
 
Top