• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Modern, low-cost, light fighter concepts?

cluttonfred

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2008
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
99
Website
cluttonfred.info
If you are familiar with my posts you know that I am a big fan of designs that seek to do more with less by seeking the smallest, simplest, lightest possible solution to an aviation need. Historically, there have been a few designs like the Folland Gnat, Douglas Skyhawk and Northrop Freedom Fighter that attempted to take a step back to that smaller, simpler, lighter solution. Burt Rutan's ARES "mudfighter" was another attempt to get back to basics.

Does anyone know of any modern designs, say 1990 to the present, for small, low-cost light fighter aircraft? I am particulary thinking of designs that might have been aimed at developing countries looking to phase out some of the capable but aging and maintenance-intensive aircraft that they bought or were given, probably second-hand, during the Cold War. The same advances in engine design and composite airframes that have given birth to modern civilian very light jet designs could be just as easily applied to light combat aircraft.

Cheers,

Matthew
 

martinbayer

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 6, 2009
Messages
700
Reaction score
165
India's LCA/Tejas, allegedly "the smallest light weight multirole combat aircraft in the world": http://www.ada.gov.in/Activities/lca/lca.html

Martin
 

Just call me Ray

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Messages
676
Reaction score
10
As far as technologically developed nations are concerned, this is the lightweight, low-cost fighter of the future.
 

Attachments

  • DVD-883-1.jpg
    DVD-883-1.jpg
    129.6 KB · Views: 583

Matej

Multiuniversal creator
Joined
Feb 13, 2006
Messages
2,616
Reaction score
116
Website
www.hitechweb.genezis.eu
Distant future to say. UCAS are very good basis for the autonomous bomb launcher, but currently they are far away from the air-to-air combat, especially on a short distances. But I agree, its a long term trend.
 

Jemiba

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
8,225
Reaction score
932
"...they are far away from the air-to-air..."

I'm not quite convinced about that, IMHO. It should be easier to identify friend
from foe in the air, than on the ground. No bushes,trees or walls to hide behind,
and disguising is much more difficult. The UAV need not care about black out and
with modern sensors "the hun in the sun" isn't a them any more, as a camera won't
blink, just close the aperture. If the targets are marked from a distant AEW aircraft,
UAVs should be able to attack autonomously in the very near future ... if there's
the political will, of course, but UAVs are mostly just seen as air-to-ground weapons,
I think.
Honi soit qui mal y pense, most airforces are said to be still led or at least heavily influ-
enced by members of their most prominent branch: Fighter pilots !
 

Just call me Ray

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Messages
676
Reaction score
10
Matej said:
Distant future to say. UCAS are very good basis for the autonomous bomb launcher, but currently they are far away from the air-to-air combat, especially on a short distances.

I don't think that's much of a concern, since it seems like in most cases "multi-role" means "bomber first".
 

Abraham Gubler

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
3,555
Reaction score
162
Matej said:
Distant future to say. UCAS are very good basis for the autonomous bomb launcher, but currently they are far away from the air-to-air combat, especially on a short distances. But I agree, its a long term trend.

A UCAV with existing sensors like the F-35's distributed aperture system (DAS) is potentially far more lethal than any piloted aircraft in a within visual range engagement. The DAS ticks the last box in the replacement of the human pilot by providing far more capability than a head with two eyeballs in tracking rapidly maneuvering close targets.
 

TomS

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
4,290
Reaction score
1,246
ATG's Homeland Defense Interceptor, perhaps. Notionally based on the Javelin personal jet with a minimal armament suited for point defense interceptor duties.

http://www.defensereview.com/atg-introduces-the-homeland-defense-interceptor-hdi/
 

TinWing

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
888
Reaction score
49
TomS said:
ATG's Homeland Defense Interceptor, perhaps. Notionally based on the Javelin personal jet with a minimal armament suited for point defense interceptor duties.

http://www.defensereview.com/atg-introduces-the-homeland-defense-interceptor-hdi/

ATG has apparently been defunct since 2007.

The HDI concept dates from 2004, and unsurprisingly, the website has long since gone offline.

Has anyone retained any information?
 

Wembley

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
56
Reaction score
1
What's the advantage of a manned fighter?
In particular for BVR the person pushing the firing button hardly needs to be in the cockpit. And for dogfighting, isn't the computer always going to have the edge?

And for a low-cost, lightweight solution, surely it has to be a UCAS which can be made smaller and cheaper than manned?
 

TomS

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
4,290
Reaction score
1,246
TinWing said:
ATG has apparently been defunct since 2007.

The HDI concept dates from 2004, and unsurprisingly, the website has long since gone offline.

Has anyone retained any information?

Recovered from Archive.org, this is the information on the HDI that was on the avtechgroup.org website as of May 2002:

Homeland Defense Interceptor

Javelin-HDI Specifications
Cruise Speed: Mach 0.92
Top Speed: Mach 1.6
Loiter Time: 3+ hours, air refueling capable
Range: 1,500 nm
Rate of Climb: 36,000+ fpm
Combat Ceiling: above 51,000 ft
Armament: 2 Air-to-air missiles & minigun (with tracers)

Proposed Technical Approach: The Javelin Interceptor, or Homeland Defense Interceptor (HDI), is a derivative of the Javelin aircraft. The Javelin aircraft is currently undergoing development for FAR 23 certification. The Javelin would modified to meet the requirements of the Interceptor mission. The Javelin has already undergone extensive wind tunnel and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) development for low speed and transonic regimes. The second round of wind tunnel tests are being scheduled and construction of a full-scale mock-up has begun. In 2003, the first Javelin prototype will be assembled and flown.

Operational Capability: The Javelin HDI will provide an inexpensive, low cost surveillance and interceptor aircraft to provide for homeland security against airborne terrorist threats. The HDI has a long loiter time, long range, high speed cruise, high altitude operations, and sophisticated data link capabilities for coordination with both airborne and ground based targeting assets. The HDI will relieve other more expensive to operate fighter/interceptor aircraft (such as F-16 & F-15) to be used to defend against more comparable military adversaries. The HDI can provide combat air patrol (CAP), airborne interdiction, and surveillance against airborne assets that do not require the expensive and advanced tactical aircraft listed above.

Rough Order of Magnitude Cost and Schedule: The HDI prototype could be available for evaluation as soon as 18-24 months from funding. The base unit cost of the HDI is estimated at $4.5M (US 2002 dollars) depending on engine and military equipment requirements.

Airspace Sovereignty & Threat Background


The threat to US airspace sovereignty consists primarily of unconventional and asymmetric air attack methods by terrorists willing to commit suicide to achieve their objective.

The US is well-equipped to defend against conventional military air threats. Conventional military attacks typically include warning through intelligence or other means. In contrast, terrorist cells are difficult to detect and infiltrate, are less predictable and therefore their attacks are difficult to prevent.

Terrorist targets tend to be visible symbols of Western power or civilization. Target selection criteria include maximum number of casualties, symbolic impact as well as disruptive effectiveness. Examples include the White House, US Capitol, Pentagon, major sports event, theme park (Disney World), Empire State Building, Sears Tower, Washington Monument, any major airport terminal, port, nuclear plants, large hydroelectric dam, Wall Street or other similar location.

Timing of an attack may coincide with Islamic religious holiday or other terrorist day of historic significance. Western holidays including New Years or July 4th may also have heightened risk.

Means of attack include non-military aircraft resources that are either bought, stolen, hijacked or commandeered. Military components of the attack are furnished by supporting nations or groups and include training, equipment, firearms, agents and explosives. The primary delivery method is by airliners, business jets, certain larger turboprop or recip twins.

These may be used with or without an additional bomb or agent to ‘enhance’ the attack on a target. Ag planes could also be used for an attack disbursing chemical or biological agent.

Air threats may, but need not originate within US airspace. While the terrorist will delay or conceal themselves as long as possible, they will eventually exhibit unusual or threat behavior that is detectable. Depending on how the target is situated relative to the attack, there is a period of time to detect and analyze the threat behavior. The type of defensive resources appropriate to specific targets or general target areas can then be deployed against the potential threat(s).

A highly visible, integrated air defense acts as a deterrent and aids in aspects of assuring the public of air travel safety. Persistent surveillance through space-based systems or advanced ground-based radar systems can increase the time to react and therefore the probability of defeating an attack. Detection and reaction time is also reduced with forward interceptor deployment and airborne patrols. Depending on how the potential target is situated, most areas of interest can be satisfactorily protected by alert or airborne interceptor assets capable of quick alert, high intercept speeds and lethal force to confront or eliminate the threat within a very few minutes. Certain high value, highly vulnerable targets of national interest will also require ground-based, point defense. Therefore, key interceptor requirements include low cost, surveillance assisted, high speed intercept. Armor plating, EMP protection, counter-countermeasures, high-rate 9G agility and survivability factors such as self-sealing tanks are not needed.

Javelin Interceptor Description


The Javelin Interceptor, or “Homeland Defense Interceptor,” (HDI) will provide a high performance economic interceptor, CAP and surveillance platform for homeland security against airborne threats of various types, including airliners, business jets, turboprop, recip twins or other general aviation aircraft, helicopters and Ag planes.

The HDI is an all metal, single-seat, high-speed light military jet, capable of all weather, day, night, VFR or IFR intercepts. A two-seat version of the HDI is available for training, SAR and utility requirements.

The Mach 1.6 HDI will be equipped with air-to-air radar and FLIR or IRST, secure military radios, including JTIDS datalink, IFF, NVG, night spotlight, laser, 7.62 mm minigun with tracer rounds, and two short-range heat seeking missiles.

Interceptor MTGW is 6,500 lbs.

Two GE J-85 variants or upgraded Williams International FJ44 engines with afterburning will power the HDI providing 8,000 lbs thrust total. Static intercept mission MTGW thrust to weight ratio is greater than 1.0 to 1.0, providing exceptional performance.

Base GE-J85 or FJ44 test engines can be available for the HDI within 18-24 months of funding. Full capability FJ44 test engines with afterburning could be available 24 months from funding.

Base cost of the HDI is $4.5 million per ship depending on specified equipment. The F-16 base unit cost is $26.9 million. HDI fuel and related cost is approximately $700 per flight hour, in contrast to $3,600 per flight hour for the F-16. Further the HDI is highly supportable, utilizing commercial-off-the-shelf equipment, allowing minimal deployment expense when compared to an F-16.

Phase 1 is concept study and prototype, approximately $20 million (ATG funding only-engine & military systems are separate line items) and 20 months in duration.

The HDI is a derivative of the civilian Javelin executive jet which will be certified to FAR Part 23, aerobatic category, and single pilot operations. The aircraft will be certified for day, night, VFR, IFR and flight into known icing conditions.



Javelin HDI Technical Specifications

Overall Length 35.5 ft. (10.82 m.)
Overall Height 10.5 ft. (3.20 m.)
Overall Width 20.0 ft. (6.10 m.)

Wing
Span 20.0 ft. (6.10 m.)
Sweep (@ ¼ chord) 33.2 degrees
Area 100.0 sq. ft. (9.29 sq. m.)
Aspect Ratio 4
Mean Aerodynamic Chord (MAC) 5.91 ft. (0.49 m.)
Taper 0.15

Horizontal Tail
Span 14.0 ft. (4.27 m.)
Sweep (@ ¼ chord) 37.0 degrees
Area 35.0 sq. f.t. (3.25 sq. m.)
Aspect Ratio 5.80
Mean Aerodynamic Chord (MAC) 2.72 ft (0.83 m)

Vertical Tail
Span 5.3 ft. (1.62 m)
Sweep (@ ¼ chord) 41.0 degrees
Area 42.6 sq. ft. (5.11 sq. m.)
Cant 25.0 degrees

Weights
Maximum Ramp weight 6,500 lbs.
Empty Weight 2,950 lbs.
Maximum Fuel 3,300 lbs. (490 gal.)
Pilot 200 lbs.
Missiles & System (2 @ 12.5 lbs ea) 50 lbs.

Options
Centerline hard-point weight limit 500 lbs.
7.62 mm Minigun & Ammunition 50 lbs.

The performance data provided below assume maximum take off weight (MTOW) and a standard day (ISA), sea level dry runway.

Parameter FAR Part 23
Take Off Distance 1,500 ft
Typical V2 Speeds (at MTOW) 125 kts
Landing Distance (at MTOW) less than 5,000 ft
Typical Approach/Landing Speeds (at MTOW) 143 kts/110 kts (231 km/hr/194 km/hr)
Stall Speed (landing config. at MTOW) 110 KCAS (176 km/hr)
Rate of Climb, Two Engine 36,000+ fpm (10,976+ mpm)
Combat Ceiling above 51,000 ft (15,545 m)
Cruising Speeds
Normal Speed 0.92M / 528 kts / 608 mph / 976 kph
Supersonic Dash 1.6 Mach
Ferry Range 1,500 nm/1,700 sm/2,778 km
Endurance
High Altitude Loiter 3+ hours (air refueling capable)


This strikes me as a fairly naive design. Based on their weight, the two air-to-air missiles have to be Stingers, but an actual Air-to-Air Stinger Launcher with two missiles weighs 100 pounds, not the 50 pounds cited here. And two Stingers would probably fail to reliably down an airliner. Likewise, the actual weight of a 7.62mm minigun installation would be several times the weight given -- a bare M134 weighs about 42 pounds, leaving only eight for mounting, ammunition, feed systems, etc.
 

cluttonfred

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2008
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
99
Website
cluttonfred.info
Setting aside the ATG HDI for a minute, the basic idea that you need, at a minimum, a MG and a pair of air-to-air missiles seems valid. The basic FN Herstal HMP 250 LCC weighs about 250 lbs fully loaded, and the latest AIM-9X (which does not require external cooling system for the IR seeker) weighs about 200 lbs. So about 750 lbs seems reasonable, including the fire control system for the Sidewinders and an intervalometer for a pair of 7-round 70mm rocket pods in place of the sidewinders for ground attack. For comparison, even the early de Havilland Vampires carried 4 x 20mm guns and ammo (which must have weighed quite a bit) and pair of 500 lb bombs at over 500 mph on less that 4000 lbf thrust.
 

Abraham Gubler

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
3,555
Reaction score
162
I'm surprised no one has yet mentioned the EADS Mako or the T-50 Golden Eagle and the Hawk 200. Actual light weight fighter projects and in the case of the later pair quite a few sales. While designed as trainers they are quite respectable light fighters especially in the fully customised versions. Just like the T-38, F-5. Be interesting to see how the F/A-50 performs on the export market in a few years. Lots of air forces with old Soviet era fighters that need replacing and its likely to be the cheapest non-Chinese fighter on the market.
 
Top