- Joined
- 26 May 2006
- Messages
- 38,285
- Reaction score
- 20,422
It's Moukhamedov Integral-2010. Designation I-2000 and attribution to OKB MiG is wrong.
OK my dear.
Last edited by a moderator:
It's Moukhamedov Integral-2010. Designation I-2000 and attribution to OKB MiG is wrong.
Hi,
does anyone hear about MiG I-255 ?.
Hi,
does anyone hear about MiG I-255 ?.
for Ye series,
Ye 1,2,3 ?,4,5,6,7,8,9,33,50,66,76,133,150,151,152,153,155,158,166 & 266
Brand Recognition. I'm sure inside Russia they call the jets "Mikoyan", but for selling anywhere else MiG has a much better recognition. As @Sferrin said back in '15: ""MiG" is practically synonymous with "Russian Fighter"" (emphasis mine)What I said was: I wonder why Mikoyan continues to call their aircraft "MiG" considering Gurevich is no longer part of their company's name.
there were not any "MiG - I - 2000"
MiG-121 ? was a 19 passenger transport project,it was mentioned in
old magazine,may Aeroplane monthly or Fly Past
Actually, it's just plain MIG (all caps) of late. This is an attempt to separate the founders of the firm (Mikoyan and Guerivich, both of whom have long-since passed on) from the modern, very successful company it is today. Back in the day, firms were named for their founders in the Soviet Union. Today, not so much. The all-caps version of the name is an attempt to adhere to newer policies without sacrificing name familiarity.I've noticed that some of you still write Mig when it should be MiG. Just saying... -SP