Lockheed Sabre Warrior UCAV concept

This concept known as Sabre Warrior
 
Two Lockheed Martin UAV/UCAV designs taken from a 2002 PowerPoint presentation entitled "Design of UAV Systems". The former has been seen earlier in this thread in lesser quality, while the second one doesn't ring a bell...

Mod edit: image removed/replaced with the higher-res
 

Attachments

  • LockheedUCAV04.jpg
    LockheedUCAV04.jpg
    58.4 KB · Views: 111
The former looks like a varient of Sabre Warrior (the tail section is different). I've always liked that one.
 
I'm really liking Sabre Warrior. Are any high resolution images of this project yet available?

I guess a lot of people might think the "double-nose" configuration is ugly, but I'm quite fond of it (perhaps in part because I've thought up similar design concepts in the past). Would be very interesting to see how that develops.
 
Kryptid said:
I'm really liking Sabre Warrior. Are any high resolution images of this project yet available?

I guess a lot of people might think the "double-nose" configuration is ugly, but I'm quite fond of it (perhaps in part because I've thought up similar design concepts in the past). Would be very interesting to see how that develops.

Saber Warrior has been dead for years.
 
...
 

Attachments

  • 1656118133316.png
    1656118133316.png
    650.8 KB · Views: 207
  • 0901wings_3_0001.jpg
    0901wings_3_0001.jpg
    209.3 KB · Views: 163
  • UCAV_3[1].jpg
    UCAV_3[1].jpg
    60.8 KB · Views: 155
  • ucav-lockheed_001.jpg
    ucav-lockheed_001.jpg
    101.1 KB · Views: 173
  • ucav-lockheed_002.jpg
    ucav-lockheed_002.jpg
    65.8 KB · Views: 154
...
 

Attachments

  • gt3.jpg
    gt3.jpg
    41.4 KB · Views: 163
  • gt2.jpg
    gt2.jpg
    14.5 KB · Views: 154
  • gt1.jpg
    gt1.jpg
    16.5 KB · Views: 146
  • gt.jpg
    gt.jpg
    17.9 KB · Views: 155
  • gt4.jpg
    gt4.jpg
    16.3 KB · Views: 115
  • gt5.jpg
    gt5.jpg
    17.9 KB · Views: 107
  • gt6.jpg
    gt6.jpg
    14.6 KB · Views: 124
  • gt8.jpg
    gt8.jpg
    29.2 KB · Views: 131
  • gt9.jpg
    gt9.jpg
    21.3 KB · Views: 134
  • gt98.jpg
    gt98.jpg
    24.7 KB · Views: 103
  • gt100.jpg
    gt100.jpg
    16.9 KB · Views: 116
  • gt88.jpg
    gt88.jpg
    23.3 KB · Views: 100
  • gt77.jpg
    gt77.jpg
    14.8 KB · Views: 98
  • gt89.jpg
    gt89.jpg
    28.2 KB · Views: 94
  • gt99.jpg
    gt99.jpg
    16.6 KB · Views: 108
  • gt101.jpg
    gt101.jpg
    56.4 KB · Views: 192
...
 

Attachments

  • Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_03.12_[2012.01.26_02.28.25].jpg
    Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_03.12_[2012.01.26_02.28.25].jpg
    160.5 KB · Views: 105
  • Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_03.12_[2012.01.26_02.28.16].jpg
    Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_03.12_[2012.01.26_02.28.16].jpg
    161 KB · Views: 100
  • Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_03.12_[2012.01.26_02.28.09].jpg
    Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_03.12_[2012.01.26_02.28.09].jpg
    160.4 KB · Views: 96
  • Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_03.12_[2012.01.26_02.28.01].jpg
    Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_03.12_[2012.01.26_02.28.01].jpg
    168.2 KB · Views: 93
  • Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_03.12_[2012.01.26_02.27.52].jpg
    Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_03.12_[2012.01.26_02.27.52].jpg
    173.7 KB · Views: 86
  • Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_03.12_[2012.01.26_02.27.30].jpg
    Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_03.12_[2012.01.26_02.27.30].jpg
    187.5 KB · Views: 86
  • Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_03.12_[2012.01.26_02.27.42].jpg
    Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_03.12_[2012.01.26_02.27.42].jpg
    182 KB · Views: 83
  • Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_03.12_[2012.01.26_02.27.16].jpg
    Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_03.12_[2012.01.26_02.27.16].jpg
    171.8 KB · Views: 78
  • Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_03.12_[2012.01.26_02.27.07].jpg
    Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_03.12_[2012.01.26_02.27.07].jpg
    173.2 KB · Views: 81
  • Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_03.12_[2012.01.26_02.26.51].jpg
    Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_03.12_[2012.01.26_02.26.51].jpg
    165.5 KB · Views: 85
  • Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_02.23_[2012.01.26_02.24.12].jpg
    Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_02.23_[2012.01.26_02.24.12].jpg
    157 KB · Views: 95
  • Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_02.22_[2012.01.26_02.23.45].jpg
    Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_02.22_[2012.01.26_02.23.45].jpg
    151.7 KB · Views: 96
  • Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_02.22_[2012.01.26_02.23.33].jpg
    Engineering Design Takes Flight.mp4_snapshot_02.22_[2012.01.26_02.23.33].jpg
    147.1 KB · Views: 122
Anyone can identify the model at 00:06 Looks like an f-35 with more stealth
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2025-08-20 154354.png
    Screenshot 2025-08-20 154354.png
    239.3 KB · Views: 112
Last edited by a moderator:
I personally appreciate Lockheed Martin considering the Buck Rogers Starfighter from the 25th Century seen at 20 seconds.
 
Last edited:
Greeting everyone! Would anyone please explain me what benefits could've come in this unmanned, and probably single-engined plane from using two distinct radome noses to the sides of what looks like a radomeless over-intake middle nose, instead of just having a singular pointy end with an integrated radome in the front?
 
Greeting everyone! Would anyone please explain me what benefits could've come in this unmanned, and probably single-engined plane from using two distinct radome noses to the sides of what looks like a radomeless over-intake middle nose, instead of just having a singular pointy end with an integrated radome in the front?
No "probably". It was definitely single engined.
 
Twin antenna allows for FMCW operation, one transmitting, the other receiving.

Generally it allows more flexibility in radar systems.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom