Lockheed MQM-105A « Aquila » (RPV-STD program)

Stargazer

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
25 June 2009
Messages
13,620
Reaction score
2,632
I really thought we already had a topic on this one, but after several unfruitful search attempts I guess I must have been wrong.

Development of the U. S. Army Aquila (XMQM-105) began as a program to provide a UAV technology demonstrator. The air vehicle was developed under Lockheed's proposal, Remotely Piloted Vehicle System Technology Demonstrator Program (RPV-STD) for the U. S. Army, LMSC-D056091, 30 August 1974. The Aquila was developed for a principal mission of surveillance, target acquisition, fire adjustment, and damage assessment in support of Army artillery and ground forces. The vehicle is configured as a flying-wing aircraft with a wing span of 12 feet, 3 inches.

Before final production ended, the Aquila had seen many modifications to its structural and aerodynamic design. The Aquila airframe obtained by the Naval Postgraduate School is from the manufacture period between December 1974 to December 1977.

The significant features of the vehicle are:
• Swept wing.
• Shrouded pusher propeller.
• Removable wings for storage.
• Lightweight Kevlar® construction.
• Pneumatic rail launch.
• Vertical barrier net recovery.

The airframe is constructed of advanced composite materials. Structural strength and stiffness are provided through the use of composite sandwich construction. This construction technique reduces the need and extra weight associated with the conventional method of rib, bulkhead, and stringer structural design. The fuselage is designed of varying elliptical cross section which is faired very smoothly into the 280 swept wing to provide a very low radar cross section. Power is provided with an aft-mounted ducted propeller. The propeller shroud provides increased safety to operating personnel during ground launch procedures and protection to the propeller during net capture, while also providing directional and longitudinal stability. Flight control was accomplished through movable elevons on the wing. A major downfall was that the vehicle required a large crew of ground personal and a considerable inventory of equipment for launch, control, and recovery.


Useful sources:
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a263514.pdf
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a068345.pdf
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a068346.pdf
 

Attachments

  • Lockheed MQM-105A Aquila.jpg
    Lockheed MQM-105A Aquila.jpg
    79.8 KB · Views: 461
  • Lockheed XMQ-105 Aquila RPV.gif
    Lockheed XMQ-105 Aquila RPV.gif
    20.5 KB · Views: 432
  • Lockheed MQM-105A Aquila Air Vehicle.gif
    Lockheed MQM-105A Aquila Air Vehicle.gif
    38.3 KB · Views: 414
  • Lockheed MQM-105A Aquila Recovery System Installation.gif
    Lockheed MQM-105A Aquila Recovery System Installation.gif
    14.3 KB · Views: 388
  • description.gif
    description.gif
    231.5 KB · Views: 394
  • aquila_01.jpg
    aquila_01.jpg
    33.8 KB · Views: 91
MQM-105 Aquila was one of those state-of-the-art projects which had me intrigued as a teen! It's a pity, but almost a give-me in the U.S. military for the past couple of decades (if not more) for the want of a viable platform and kill it with attempting to seek or fit way to much into a single platform; which inevitably leads massive cost overruns and eventual cancellation of the program! Sad, very sad!It has always made me wonder what the Aquila could have (and should have) been if managed realistically :eek: Thanks for bringing the project up Stephen!!

Regards
Pioneer
 
Last edited:
From the International Defense Review, June 1975:
Army has ordered 30 XMQM-105 Aquila RPVs and 4 ground support systems from Lockheed,
to evaluate overall mini-RPV capabilities under its Little-R program.
Payload sensor packages for test include real-time surveillance, photo reconnaissance,
target acquisition, target location and artillery adjustment, and laser target designation.
Aquilas are being built for Lockheed by Developmental Sciences, Inc (DSI).
 
Aquila had a bad habit of breaking link and flying off to wherever. Had one fly across the front of my helicopter at Ft. Hood when it was supposed to be operating on the other side of the fort's training area. This did not make aviators excited to see it operating around them.
 
Back
Top Bottom