• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Interstate Assault Drones (TDR-1, XBDR)

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
5,787
Reaction score
278
Oh!
(1) XBDR 1/17 scale gust tunnel test model with slit shape air intake.
And
(2) XBDR 1/17 scale gust tunnel test model with slit shape air intake and wind shield.
Perfect. Thanks for sharing. :D
So Interstate planned to develop manned XBDR version in parallel with drone?

Interesting site.
http://www.digplanet.com/wiki/Category:Tailless_aircraft
 

windswords

CLEARANCE: Secret
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
298
Reaction score
10
I didn't realize there was an entry for the XBDR under Missile Projects. I should have used the search feature. :-[

However the manned version is a "whole 'nother kettle of fish". Was this a serious consideration or just the fantasy musings of a designer? It would seem just a fantasy to me because by putting a man in the machine you reduce it's range, payload, and general performance.
 

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
5,787
Reaction score
278
windswords said:
I didn't realize there was an entry for the XBDR under Missile Projects. I should have used the search feature. :-[

However the manned version is a "whole 'nother kettle of fish". Was this a serious consideration or just the fantasy musings of a designer? It would seem just a fantasy to me because by putting a man in the machine you reduce it's range, payload, and general performance.
Ummm....But how do you think about NACA report, 1/17 gust tunnel test model?
 

windswords

CLEARANCE: Secret
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
298
Reaction score
10
You are correct, Backkite-san. The second wind tunnel model pictured above has a cockpit canopy. More than a fantasy!
 

robunos

You're Mad, You Are.....
Senior Member
Joined
May 1, 2007
Messages
1,729
Reaction score
7
Perhaps the manned version was purely for development?
After all, this programme was going to be integrating three advanced technologies into one system, jet engines, tailless aerodynamics, and remote TV guidance. Having a manned version would allow you to perfect the first two, without relying on the third, which could be developed separately in a test-bed aircraft...

cheers,
Robin.
 

windswords

CLEARANCE: Secret
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
298
Reaction score
10
Excellent point Robin. The manned version would be a stepping stone to the final version.
 

Silencer1

That now I am the Ruler of the Queen's Navee!
Joined
Aug 3, 2009
Messages
539
Reaction score
30
Hi!

There is a thread in this forum, covering "precursor" of this aircraft/missile - Interstate TDR assault glider.
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,2114.0.html

It was also have manned/unmanned versions.

I wonder, how the relatively small company has been daring enough to develop and put in combat operations (of course, very limited) such sophisticate piece of weaponry.

Have a nice reading!
 

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
5,787
Reaction score
278
robunos said:
Perhaps the manned version was purely for development?
After all, this programme was going to be integrating three advanced technologies into one system, jet engines, tailless aerodynamics, and remote TV guidance. Having a manned version would allow you to perfect the first two, without relying on the third, which could be developed separately in a test-bed aircraft...

cheers,
Robin.
Excellent Robin!! ;) Of course final goal may be a drone.
 

sienar

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
566
Reaction score
78
Found this presentation of the Interstate drone program


At 42:55 it has some details on the XBDR

He says it was based on a Northrop design, he thinks the I-90n (?). It was tested as a glider, and he makes it sound like it was a manned test.
 

Bill S

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
May 17, 2008
Messages
507
Reaction score
58
Clioman said:
These might be of interest. The source is "XBDR-1 Mock Up," Interstate Aircraft & Engineering Corp. Rpt No. W 272. The document is not dated, but the photos are dated "11-19-43." Sorry for the poor quality -- it's a photocopy from an original located at NARA, file 72-AC-1B.
Further to Clioman's earlier post from the same source and location are some scans of the XBDR-1 Mock Up.
 

Attachments

Bill S

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
May 17, 2008
Messages
507
Reaction score
58

hesham

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
23,863
Reaction score
919
Nice photos my dear Bill.
 

Mark Nankivil

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
1,527
Reaction score
128
Most excellent Bill - thanks! Mark
 

edwest

CLEARANCE: Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2007
Messages
486
Reaction score
42
This is far too sophisticated for the time period. And the bigger mystery: Why wasn't this used in Vietnam?
 

Sherman Tank

I don't want to change my personal text
Joined
Oct 15, 2016
Messages
88
Reaction score
5
It's based on the letter-codes used for US Navy aviation designations. In this case:

V = Fixed-Wing
TD = Target Drone (the original USN term for what we now call guided missiles)
 
Top