Energia - Buran Space Transportation System

Did the main rocket use foam insulation like the American main tank? Tha's what I always wondered.
Yes, it was covered in spray-on foam insulation similar to the one used on the space shuttle (Ripor 2N, PPU-17) with some sections covered in ablative material (PPU-306, PPU-306N, PPU-306NP, applied mostly around the aft orbiter attachment points)
 
Oh so the Buran would had had the same issues as the space shuttle!
Yes, but since Buran was never meant to become the only Soviet crewed spacecraft, Rescue with one or two Soyuz (or eventually, Zarya capsule) would be more manageable if the heatshield would be thought to be compromised, there were proposals to carry emergency return capsules in the payload bay too.
 
Oh so the Buran would had had the same issues as the space shuttle!
Well, the oxygen ramp on STS faced the orbiter on the exterior. Energiya could have had the line in the middle of opposite from the orbiter.
No SRBs--no Challenger.
 
Oh so the Buran would had had the same issues as the space shuttle!
Falling ice was definitely a serious issue that was considered by the designers and was probably what caused most of the tile loss during the 1988 orbital flight. The core stage did not have any foam ramps like the ones on the Space Shuttle ET, so a Columbia-type foam impact was unlikely, same with Challenger-type SRB burn-through, but "standard" ceramic tile spaceplane risks were still present: falling ice, tile erosion, gap filler protrusion, airframe overheating etc.
 
Well, the oxygen ramp on STS faced the orbiter on the exterior. Energiya could have had the line in the middle of opposite from the orbiter.
Doesn't matter. Debris came off of other areas than foam ramps
 
Well it's a pity that those charts are not online (at least I haven't seen them...). I have tried several times to communicate with Vadim, but without any answer from him! The Energia-Buran system is a technological marvel, but it is very difficult to find detailed info about their systems, even in Russian language. There is information, but it is distributed, so you have to do some detective work to put the puzzle together. But hey, it keeps us entertained.
I was able to contact him and buy DVDs and his book. Can share his WhatsApp number
 
What a dreadful waste it should`ve been in a museum,ideally side by side with its american counterpart........well dreams are free I suppose.
If Roscosmos had maintained the building in which the Buran and its' Energia launch-rocket were in it could've turned it into a tourist attraction making money from interested western tourists wanting to see the Soviet space Shuttle.
 
If Roscosmos...
Buran burried under the fallen roof was a property of Kazakhstan. As well as the building and all the area where that examplar was stored. The other two exemplars still existing and located in Baikonur belong to Kazakhstan as well.
 
Buran burried under the fallen roof was a property of Kazakhstan. As well as the building and all the area where that examplar was stored. The other two exemplars still existing and located in Baikonur belong to Kazakhstan as well.

Well in that case Kazakstan missed out on a big money-making tourist trap.
 
Was that the soviet equivalent of the Enterprise?
No, the Enterprise was built by NASA to perform atmospheric test flights after being launched from a modified Boeing 747. The OK-MT was built for static testing (*), the only time it flew was when it was transported by the Myasishchev VM-T "Atlant" from Moscow to Baikonur.

(*) OK-MT was built in Moscow in 1983 for technological developments, the transport documentation development and loading of the gas tanks, the hermetic systems of safety, the entry and the exit of the crew, the development of the military operations, the maintenance and the flight manuals. Source: www.buran-energia.com

5aa14292 (Копировать)_833570-enhance-2x.jpg
 
Last edited:
The Analog could take off and land on its own...Not space rated --but without the burden of SSMEs, a Buran type craft could have turbojets...like OK-92.

The potential of an orbiter actually being a full airplane is worth chunking heavy engines--especially if they can be cheaply 3D printed.

Wet workshop out of the core...maybe put engines in the payload bay for return once the paying payload is out?

Or refill the core like Mars Starship.
 
The Soviet Enterprise was OK-GLI, which is in the Speyer museum these days.

So, OK-GLI:

640px-OK-GLI_Technik_Museum_Speyer_2008_12.JPG
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom