• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

F-23 NATF (not real....)

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
12,453
Reaction score
3,476
First go - comments please :)

wing is scaled up 10%, tailplanes removed, engine intake moved forward and canards added. Probably too similar to F-23.
 

Attachments

  • NATF.jpg
    NATF.jpg
    36.1 KB · Views: 547

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,048
Reaction score
877
Looks pretty much as I was imagining it - very X-36-style with trapezoid canards (preferred one). At least, what else you can squeeze off from the YF-23 as we know it?
 

Rafael

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Oct 23, 2006
Messages
128
Reaction score
4
Plausible. or at the very least, beautiful.
I believe it deserves further development, like a 3-view stage or more cgi art.

Rafa
 

Deino

ACCESS: Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2006
Messages
2,736
Reaction score
511
overscan said:
I think it probably retains too much F-23.

I think that shouldn't be the problem, but in my opinion I would have expected something more like the JAST-proposal shown here:

http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,2392.45.html

Deino
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,048
Reaction score
877
Hmm, Deino, where's significant difference between Overscan's effort and this JAST concept?:)
BTW, always was wondering how effective vertical tails would be at high AoA with such a placement.
 

Deino

ACCESS: Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2006
Messages
2,736
Reaction score
511
flateric said:
Hmm, Deino, where's significant difference between Overscan's effort and this JAST concept?:)
BTW, always was wondering how effective vertical tails would be at high AoA with such a placement.

The biggest different surely would be the tail and the wing with a different leading-edge and trailling-edge angle ! ... or did I misinterpret something !?
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,048
Reaction score
877
OK, we just got the main idea. In 10 years or so we will se how it was for real)
 

Deino

ACCESS: Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2006
Messages
2,736
Reaction score
511
flateric said:
OK, we just got the main idea. In 10 years or so we will se how it was for real)

Just two crude proposals ...
 

Attachments

  • NATF-Deino.jpg
    NATF-Deino.jpg
    32.3 KB · Views: 373

CFE

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Sep 1, 2007
Messages
259
Reaction score
3
I would definitely expect the F-23N to have vertical stabilizers. While tailless is fine for subsonic jets like X-36 and the B-2, a supersonic aircraft is probably going to need some help in the back for stability.
 

Sundog

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
2,821
Reaction score
270
Although the X-36 demonstrator was subsonic, it was representative of a supersonic tail-less design. Also, if you check the thread I posted here a while back on tail-less fighter designs, you'll see many supersonic tail-less fighter proposals.
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,048
Reaction score
877
NATF-23 has vertical tails
 

Sundog

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
2,821
Reaction score
270
I wasn't referring to the NATF-23, I was referring to that statement about the X-36.

But I doubt the NATF-23 looked like any of the proposals above, because they look too good and everyone I've heard from about it (Anyone seen Evan lately? I hope he is well.) said the NATF-23 was butt ugly.
 

Similar threads

Top